On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 07:12:57PM -0700, Shirish Kalele wrote:
Hi,
Is there a specific need to roundup the reported allocation size of a file
using SMB_ROUNDUP or SMB_ROUNDUP_ALLOCATION?
Samba seems to report the allocation size inconsistently: it uses a roundup
in some places and
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 08:00:26AM -0700, Shirish Kalele wrote:
But the values we send don't even match up with NTFS allocation values. So
what does getting it right mean?
Doing what NT does :-). Also, it changes the behaviour of how NT
will write into new space. This can be *very* efficient.
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 01:24:36PM -0400, David Collier-Brown wrote:
David Collier-Brown wrote:
I haven't looked at the code, but if it uses F_SETLKW
you might want to do a trylock first, implemented via
F_GETLK or F_SETLK, as this would allow subsequent
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 11:47:42AM -0400, William Jojo wrote:
I'm posting this again. Jeremy, this seems very bad.
We are running AIX 4.3.3 with 2.2.4-pre AND 5.1.0 with 2.2.4-pre.
The problem is when you reopen a table you just created, MS-Access hurls
and indicates the Visual
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 02:27:36PM +0200, Andreas Moroder wrote:
Hello,
I installed the cvs version from last friday. If a user on a win2k workstation
tries to rename a directory in a samba share, he gets a error message. He can
delete this directory or even create new ones. On a win98
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 07:11:41PM +0200, Beschorner Daniel wrote:
Hi,
if 2.2.4 is really at horizon, this bug in current CVS should be fixed.
[2002/04/23 17:01:13, 0] smbd/open.c:open_file(179)
Error doing fstat on open file kuhnert/NTUSER.DAT.tmp (No such file or
directory)
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 02:02:05PM -0400, William Jojo wrote:
It would be from [homes]
h:\db#.mdb
where # is the attempt number that we did at that time...are you checking
the 222 and 223a versions of the logs?
Yes, I'm looking at both these logs. The only difference
I can see is
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 07:47:29PM -0700, Shirish Kalele wrote:
Jerry,
csc policy is for client-side offline caching. I think Damir is looking
for Samba to support files offlined by storage managers like HSM. Both are
called offline files. One of the reasons the csc policy parameter was so
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 09:54:21AM +0930, Tristan Ball wrote:
Guys, I'm getting the following in some of my logs:
[2002/05/14 08:36:21, 0] lib/debug.c:reopen_logs(349)
Unable to open new log file /var/log/samba/log.dancer: Too many open
files
[2002/05/14 08:36:21, 0]
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 01:25:52PM -0300, Ariel Mella wrote:
i know that is part of the samba distribution but is away of the samba team
but, could you include the recycle bin vfs module?
Yes, we should add that to the rpms I think.
Jeremy.
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 01:19:31AM -0700, Anjaneya Sastry wrote:
Hello Everybody,
Can you help ?
Our application is in RMCOBOL. We use Rmcobol Index
files. These are located in Solaris 2.8. Using Samba
2.2 we created a share and accessing the directory
from windows.
From windows
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 01:01:05AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
(I was going to commit this, but decided that I should get some comment
first)
More code cleanup - this lot a bit more dodgy than the last:
The aim is to trim pwd_cache down to size. Its overly complex, and a
pain to
Well you won't find them shouting about it, but if you dig down
in their web pages on Solaris 9 you'll find this :
Common Linux applications, such as Samba, Apache, Linux (GNU) commands,
etc., are included in the Solaris 9 Operating Environment. The Solaris
Software Companion CD has an even more
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 02:56:05PM -0400, Richard Bollinger wrote:
Much thanks and praises to whomever diagnosed and fixed the timing problems with
linux 2.0 and
oplocks. On one busy 2.0.38 server, I had seen consistent oplock timeouts...
especially when
running an executable DOS program
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 03:18:04PM -0400, Richard Bollinger wrote:
I only ran a quick functionality test ... a very old version of Netbench (2.10). It
always hung for
30 seconds when starting netbench.exe... until the oplock timed out. Seems fine now.
Great ! Thanks - good news. This will
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 10:39:45PM +0400, Michail Vidiassov wrote:
Dear Guru,
I am running samba 2.2.4 on FreeBSD 4.5
The size of mapped drives with quota enabled is always shown as 0 by W2k.
There was no such problem with samba 2.2.3a.
As far as I undestand, th esource of the problem
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 10:00:43AM -0400, Richard Bollinger wrote:
How embarassing... still apparently broken / inconsistent :-(
Client is win98 4.10.1998.
[2002/05/24 08:36:40, 0] smbd/server.c:main(707)
smbd version 2.2.5-pre started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 02:05:12PM -0400, Richard Bollinger wrote:
OK... time for a brain flush and refill...
I went back and verified my test conditions and determined that the same failure can
be demonstrated
with every server platform we own running Samba 2.X with oplocks enabled and
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 07:16:07PM -0400, Richard Bollinger wrote:
Same exact failure with
Linux 2.0.38
Linux 2.2.20
Linux 2.4.18
SunOS 5.6
I'll have to let you know Tuesday if it fails with just any old executable... but
I'd expect it
would.
Well can you send me the
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 02:05:12PM -0400, Richard Bollinger wrote:
OK... time for a brain flush and refill...
I went back and verified my test conditions and determined that the same failure can
be demonstrated
with every server platform we own running Samba 2.X with oplocks enabled and
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 10:26:00PM -0400, Richard Bollinger wrote:
Right... or if it times out because of the dead time setting... so it's shouldn't be
that rare
in the wild. I have a feeling that a lot of folks just disable oplocks to avoid the
troubles.
My test at work showed that the
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 10:26:00PM -0400, Richard Bollinger wrote:
Right... or if it times out because of the dead time setting... so it's shouldn't be
that rare
in the wild. I have a feeling that a lot of folks just disable oplocks to avoid the
troubles.
My test at work showed that the
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 06:06:52AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Has it been checked on FreeBSD? If not, if you give me the source, I will
check it for you.
It is GPL code. I don't think it can be used in the FreeBSD kernel
(correct me if I'm wrong Steve).
Jeremy.
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 02:05:19PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
Well, I've managed to get this to happen to a W2K server too,
took me a while though.
It's definately a client bug with the Win9x client, but we seem
to trigger it all the time whereas Win2k seems to trigger it sometimes
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:09:00PM -0400, Richard Bollinger wrote:
Stoping the server service is a very unusual step. Disconnecting an individual
connection,
possibly via idle timeout, is not so unusual and I don't see the same behaviour
with W2K server
vs Samba. Something else must be
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 08:10:22AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Isn't there a way we can 'idle' the connection by tearing down the
protocol? Actually issuing a 'you are idle, shutting down' to the
client?
Nope - would require a client change I'm afraid. There's nothing
in the protocol
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:48:27PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And are you saying that Win2k will never 'idle' a client connection? I'm
sure I've seen smbfs being 'idled' by NT before...
I don't think it ever drops the TCP connection on purpose.
Jeremy.
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 09:35:38AM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:55:20PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:48:27PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And are you saying that Win2k will never 'idle' a client connection? I'm
sure I've seen
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 06:47:00PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The attached set of patches cleans up samba-3.0-alpha17 for
systems such as Stratus VOS that implement POSIX-1996 but do not
provide full Unix compatibility. I would be most grateful if
this patch could be applied against
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 05:50:58PM -0700, Matt Seitz wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
The only thing would be to completely disallow
connection timeouts for Win9x clients - I'm not sure
this is what we want.
Perhaps timeouts could be prevented for a 9x client
On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 02:52:00PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Jeremy's request, here is a version of the POSIX-96 cleanup
patches for the Samba 2.2 branch.
Applied, thanks !
Jeremy.
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 07:51:53PM +0200, Kai Krueger wrote:
This is the first version of the patch to implement access control to SAM.
It implements checks of the desired access in all open functions (those that create
handles)
against the appropriate default SDs of the previous patch and
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 07:44:02PM +0200, Juergen Hasch wrote:
Hi Jerry,
Am Sonntag, 2. Juni 2002 03:15 schrieb Gerald Carter:
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Juergen Hasch wrote:
Now I never would have brought this up because I don't care to much for
2.2 and I was just curious when I made the
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 12:12:45AM +0200, Juergen Hasch wrote:
the patch works fine for except for one thing. In the acl security selection
list (showing a list of all available users and groups) the german umlaut
characters are wrong. This is because the unix charset is sent to the
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:03:05PM +0200, Juergen Hasch wrote:
The conversion in srv_samr_nt.c is needed to show the correct group list in
the ACL-add dialogue. The conversion in lsa_srv_nt.c is needed to set a new
ACL entry in unix codepage after selecting it from the list.
The change in
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 03:39:59PM -0400, Richard Bollinger wrote:
Test scenerio:
Server: Samba 2_2 CVS as of morning of 6/4/2002. Linux 2.4.18 ext2 file system.
AMD Athlon
processor.
On PC...
net use f: \\server\share
type hi.txt
On Server...
smbstatusshows
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 12:40:46PM -0400, Dan Barrett wrote:
The problem I reported would occur with Samba 2.2.4, but not 2.2.2. set_sd() in
2.2.4 returns False if the sd_len passed by the client is 0. This would be okay,
except Novell clients apparently set sd_len=0.
To fix the novell
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Dan Barrett wrote:
Jeremy,
I only observed sd_len==0 from our Novell clietn for NT_TRANSACT_CREATE. My first
attempt at a fix was in call_nt_transact_create(), and it worked for my problem. So
NT_TRANSACT_CREATE was the sd_len==0 for our
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 08:28:08PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
I can't remember just now, but can you rename it while open?
Under POSIX, yes.
If you can, then you may rename the file on unlink to a very rare name
and then delete oin close().
This is what NFS does.
I have no idea what
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 05:02:58PM +0300, Toomas Soome wrote:
I cave an question regarding to pdb_ interface.
in 2.2 pdb_nisplus code I translated some strings from dos to unix and
vice-versa. this translation helped to manage information correctly from
windows side and from unix side.
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 12:25:42AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Otherwise, all strings are 'unix strings'.
But what character set is a unix string ? What if
we get an incoming UCS2 string that doesn't map ?
We need to use utf8 in all the backends.
This is a good chance to fix this mess
to be
expected I guess :-) :-).
I'd appreciate any data points from people actually running with this
turned on.
Thanks,
Jeremy Allison,
Samba Team.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 12:28:18PM -0500, Esh, Andrew wrote:
Suggest the following fix:
Index: winbindd_rpc.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/nsswitch/winbindd_rpc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.22.2.7
diff -u -c
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 02:25:41AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
To what extent do people feel that these are relevant to a CIFS benchmark,
and what other areas have I missed.
Well in defense of NetBench (I can't believe I'm saying this :-)
it doesn't attempt to give full coverage of SMB,
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 01:47:04PM -0700, Ben Johnson wrote:
As far as I know we do publish the open source code we use. I don't
know where or how it is published, but there is so much open source code
in it that I can't imagine we'd make that kind of mistake. It's build
around a Linux
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 11:53:59AM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
Some users are reported as getting these errors in the logs when
using samba 2.2.5 and the recycle bin on FreeBSD, any ideas?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=39850
smbd must be compiled so that it is exporting
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 01:43:54PM -0400, Johnston, Christopher (DCSA) wrote:
Quote from Redhat:
Hi, I have an update on your issue!
A direct quote from engineering on your issue:
As I understand it, smbsh can not work on the recent glibc versions as they no
longer support the
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 02:06:39PM -0400, Johnston, Christopher (DCSA) wrote:
Jeremy,
Thanks.. is there a fix for this sometime in the future? or is this something that
has to do with GLIBC not allowing these symbols or functions to be used anymore?
It is a GLIBC issue as far as I'm aware.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 02:25:56PM -0400, Johnston, Christopher (DCSA) wrote:
That stinks.. so smbsh is pretty much usueless at this point unless those symbols
get put back into glibc..
On Linux, yes. It still works on Solaris I think.
Jeremy.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 01:30:03PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
Dave C-B has previously posted here details of an smbsh redesign that
would allow preloading of libsmbwrapper.so to work under Linux in spite
of the glibc changes. In fact, it would work better, as his design
doesn't require
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 02:30:44PM -0400, Johnston, Christopher (DCSA) wrote:
Yea we have it working on Solaris 2.8 with no problems at all.. just need it on
Linux.. since that is the big push from management..
Since I got you hot on this email.. winbindd.. has there been any plans in to
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 05:57:24PM -0500, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
Jeremy Allison wrote:
:
Oh don't tell me we've run into the *BSD of the month club :-).
Thank goodness Slackware and Debian and Mandrake and SuSE and RedHat and
Caldera and Redmond and Trinux and Yellowdog are all
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 09:39:46PM +0900, Yasuma Takeda wrote:
In Samba-JP, buffer overflow problem was reported.
If samba is configured with --with-tdbsam, init_sam_from_buffer function
contains a buffer overflow vulnerability.
In a certain case, user can use this vulnerability by
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 02:08:03PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
Can you send more details please to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and CC:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't immediately see the problem this patch is fixing and need to
understand it before I can apply it.
Never mind - I see the problem now
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 04:26:26PM +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
[please keep me in the CC line for replies, as I am not subscribed to
this list]
Since upgrading one of our servers that handles a number of print queues
to Red Hat 7.3, I started getting complaints about jobs not getting
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 05:07:30PM +0100, Daniel Niasoff wrote:
When auditing with VFS the pathname recorded is only the relative path for
the share not the the full path all the way from root.
Are there any plans to change this as I want to use auditing as a method of
backing up (i:e:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 03:32:50PM -0400, Michael Sweet wrote:
In addition, no matter what Unicode representation is used, you
still have to deal with different representations of the same
character (is it a single character a with an umlat, or a
plus a combining umlat character?, etc.)
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 03:41:36PM -0400, ZINKEVICIUS,MATT (HP-Loveland,ex1) wrote:
Yep, that's my code. I had been working with Jeremy to get this integrated
but we hit a legal issue. It was recently overcome though he probably
doesn't know it yet :-)
No I didn't ! Tell me more please ! :-).
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 02:48:48PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As we know, in linux, there's no the concept of DENY MODE.
In M$ windows, when open a file, you use the API
CreateFile (LPCTSTR lpFileName,
DWORD dwDesiredAccess,
DWORD dwShareMode,
LPSECURITY_ATTRIBUTES
59 matches
Mail list logo
