Hi,
most file access rights sync between ACLs of linux and the security tab
of windows file properties, but not all. Where are the other infos stored?
I tried in linux 'getfattr -d' and 'samba-tool ntacl get', but neither
output changed when using windows to add individual right for a user
On 30.09.2013 21:58, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 16:12 +0200, Klaus Hartnegg wrote:
I tried in linux 'getfattr -d' and 'samba-tool ntacl get', but neither
output changed when using windows to add individual right for a user
Meanwhile I found that 'cp -a' does transfer all
Am 01.10.2013 10:18, schrieb Partha Sarathi:
I hope you shoud use the below parameter under all share sections to get
the NTACL working.
vfs objects = acl_xattr,
Doesn't make a difference. Seems to be on by default, even if not in
smb.conf. When I run testparam it shows it in global section:
On 03.10.2013 16:17, Kevin Field wrote:
Have an ancient (1995!) piece of software that uses 8.3 filename format.
After the switch, long filenames became useless in the context of the
File-Open dialog box. Instead of the first few characters, we get maybe
1 character the same if we're lucky,
On 03.10.2013 17:20, Doug Tucker wrote:
client attempts to access a resource on a
shared drive either by saving, or just simply clicking on a folder on
the shared drive can takes minutes to complete.
Is it reproducable by clicking the same folder again after rebooting the
client?
Do you
On 04.10.2013 01:14, Kevin Field wrote:
The minimum value is 1 and the maximum value is 6.
mangle prefix is effective only when mangling method is hash2.
This does exactly what we want!
Be warned that this will produce duplicate filenames.
Windows prevents duplicates, Samba does not.
--
To
On 05.10.2013 06:12, Bernd Glueckert wrote:
A scanner puts his output on the samba server, but it's not visible for
the W7-Clients. A couple of minutes later it's visible. Refreshing
Explorer by pressing F5 doesnt help.
Sounds like Windows clients cache the contents of network drives and
On 01.10.2013 20:32, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
vfs objects = acl_xattr,
we put that in to the smb.conf 'by magic' whenever we see
'server role = active directory domain controller'. Frankly I think it
should be the default, except for the fact that we didn't want to change
it for upgrading
Hi,
For me the main challenge in updating to samba 4 are docs. This was also
the case with samba 3, but 4 is a lot more challenging. I end up
spending hours testing different variants, because by reading docs I
cannot find answers, even after hours of searching.
The results of google-search
Hi,
The page
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Release_Planning
doesn't really tell the date until samba 3 will receive security
updates. It seems that it could end already in 9 months. I find it
unlikely that most users will have switched by that time. The 9 month
rule is fine for a
Hi,
when I don't want to switch to Active Directory, but don't want to be
stuck on version 3.6 either, can I simply give samba 4 a copy of the old
smb.conf file?
Will it be able to store all windows acl's in extended attributes, or is
this improvement only available in combination with
11 matches
Mail list logo
