I solved that by playing around with the oplocks
[global]
kernel oplocks = no
oplocks = no
level2 oplocks = no
Shares:
veto oplock files = /*.doc/*.docx/*.xls/*.xlsx/*.pptx/*.ppsx/*.ppt/*.pps
Then it was working again with 7 and samba 3.6.0
- but yes it was no problem with 3.5.11
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/11/2011 01:13 PM, James Moe wrote:
Hello,
samba Version 3.5.4-5.3.1-2489-SUSE-SL11.3
I do not understand why the file permissions of mounted shares are
different when the share is viewed locally and when viewed remotely.
[...]
Is
From: James Moe ji...@sohnen-moe.com
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:21:04 -0700
samba Version 3.5.4-5.3.1-2489-SUSE-SL11.3
I do not understand why the file permissions of mounted shares are
different when the share is viewed locally and when viewed remotely.
[...]
Is there a way
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/20/2011 09:42 AM, TAKAHASHI Motonobu wrote:
Is there a way to have the actual, real, local permissions shown to
remote hosts?
No, CIFS essentially do not have the semantics of permission.
Because it is natively used to share Windows file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/11/2011 01:13 PM, James Moe wrote:
samba Version 3.5.4-5.3.1-2489-SUSE-SL11.3
I do not understand why the file permissions of mounted shares are
different when the share is viewed locally and when viewed remotely.
[...]
Is there a
Fred Legace wrote:
I am running Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Server.
snip
My problem is if I use create mode = 770, WinXP users can only manage a
760 permission setting. That will not allow someone else in the group to
set the file to readonly
Well, I just checked a couple of recently created files
Hi,
Thanks for your input.
B.t.w., I use security = ADS
I tried hundreds of combinations of configurations and options, but it just
won't work.
It works rather ok if you limit it to the Unix permissions ( plain user and
group permissions ) , but as soon as you try to put an ace referring to an
Please ignore previous message. I messed up some testing results
I'm trying to clear out things straight first.
--
View this message in context:
http://samba.2283325.n4.nabble.com/File-permissions-getting-destroyed-with-M-software-on-ZFS-tp2915766p2954213.html
Sent from the Samba -
Hi,
I see you use samba with zfs. But how on earth do you prevent the 'deny'
aces from being the first in the ACL, and thus denying all access to the
resource ?
I'm able to add permissions via the MS UI ( I added an AD group
'regio-users' )
When I then create a file or folder via Samba, I get
I had a lot of problems with this as well.I found it hard to find
much documentation on the zfs module in samba from either samba or sun.
(PS- A big thumbs down to Sun and the OpenSolaris crowd for apparently
abandoning samba.)
I am running Samba 3.0.x from Sun on two servers and samba
Well,
I think I got it fixed, but not sure if it is the correct way.
This is what my share ens looks like now:
[ens]
comment = ENS Groups
path = /XKA2/admin/ENS
valid users = +admin
force group = admin
read only = No
create mask = 0770
force create mode = 0770
On Donnerstag, 3. Juni 2010 wrote Steve Wolfe:
Samba 3.4.7-58.fc12, windows 7 client.
I have a share where, if I right-click and chose properties,
everything shows up as read only. I can un-check that, hit apply,
and if I view the properties again, they are read only.
Interestingly enough,
Hi Steve,
Do you have installed the acl ? also check if filesystem below have the
option acl enabled.
Saludos!
2010/6/3 Steve Wolfe bafena...@gmail.com
Samba 3.4.7-58.fc12, windows 7 client.
I have a share where, if I right-click and chose properties, everything
shows up as read
It's not installed.
I logged on as a domain administrator and unchecked the read only, now it
still appears on directories, but NOT on individual files. The software now
succeeds.
I'd still like to fix the issue if possible, but if not... employees are
able to work. :-D
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Sunday 18 January 2009 18:38:25 Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Is it possible to define file rights, such that -
The file is owned by root, with full privleges on the Linux server.
The file is shared by a group users.
The shared file should be available for read and write
On Monday 19 January 2009 14:29:16 Daniel L. Miller wrote:
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Sunday 18 January 2009 18:38:25 Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Is it possible to define file rights, such that -
The file is owned by root, with full privleges on the Linux server.
The file is shared by a
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Daniel L. Miller dmil...@amfes.com wrote:
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Sunday 18 January 2009 18:38:25 Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Is it possible to define file rights, such that -
The file is owned by root, with full privleges on the Linux server.
The file is
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Daniel L. Miller dmil...@amfes.com wrote:
Is it possible to define file rights, such that -
The file is owned by root, with full privleges on the Linux server.
The file is shared by a group users.
The shared file should be available for read and write access.
On Sunday 18 January 2009 18:38:25 Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Is it possible to define file rights, such that -
The file is owned by root, with full privleges on the Linux server.
The file is shared by a group users.
The shared file should be available for read and write access.
That part's
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
I'm running into a file permission issue.
I have a share called data configured simply as:
[data]
read only = no
path = /mnt/data
For test purposes, I have a file called t.jpg.
-rwx-- 1 bek bek
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
samba@lists.samba.org
Subject
Re: [Samba] File permissions
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
I'm running into a file permission issue.
I have a share called data configured simply as:
[data]
read only = no
path
There are Acls Posix on the file or folder that the file is in?
Regards,
-
iarly Selbir ( Ski0s )
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:49 PM, John Drescher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
@lists.samba.org
Subject
Re: [Samba] File permissions
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
755 root.matt
I changed that to 755 root.root and changed the file permissions to 770
bek.trusted (matt is part of the 'trusted' group). Now I can open the
file,
but can't delete it.. I
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:06 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So then explicit file permissions mean nothing? After changing the parent
directory to 770 and root.trusted, I was able to delete the file regardless
of what the actual file permissions are..
See here about *nix file permissions:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:56:26AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
755 root.matt
I changed that to 755 root.root and changed the file permissions to 770
bek.trusted (matt is part of the 'trusted' group). Now I can open the
file, but can't delete it.. I expected to be able to open it and
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
755 root.matt
I changed that to 755 root.root and changed the file permissions to 770
bek.trusted (matt is part of the 'trusted' group). Now I can open the file,
but can't delete it.. I expected to be able to open it and delete it..
/03/2008 11:49 AM
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
samba@lists.samba.org
Subject
Re: [Samba] File permissions
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
I'm running into a file permission issue.
I have a share called data configured simply as:
[data
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 12:58:41AM +1100, Gerry Marthe wrote:
The relevant section from smb.conf on the samba server is:
[common]
comment = Common Area
path = /common
read only = no
valid users = @users
create mask = 0660
force create
Hi Jeremy,
Thanks - that does make sense.
Can you tell me then why /bin/touch appears immune to the Samba
settings?
Gerry.
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 11:48 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 12:58:41AM +1100, Gerry Marthe wrote:
The relevant section from smb.conf on the
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 11:18:49AM +1100, Gerry Marthe wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
Thanks - that does make sense.
Can you tell me then why /bin/touch appears immune to the Samba
settings?
If you can make the CIFS client violate the
forced settings on the Samba server that's
a server bug and I'll fix
Yes Jeremy, it seems that I can make the CIFS client violate the
forced settings on the Samba server.
Specific example:
/* As root, issue the following mount command from client. */
mount.cifs //10.0.1.5/common /mnt/smb -o
rw,uid=500,user=abdv29,password=***
/* Switch user to abdv29 */
su
Carlos Rivera-Jones schrieb:
drwxrws---+ 2 ralfgro ve6 2007-04-18 17:28 testdir
2770 [drwxrws--] permissions will force inherit at the file level
system, ignoring Samba. Set the directory to 0770 permissions, and new
items would be created with 660 as per smb.conf
I removed the gid
drwxrws---+ 2 ralfgro ve6 2007-04-18 17:28 testdir
2770 [drwxrws--] permissions will force inherit at the file level
system, ignoring Samba. Set the directory to 0770 permissions, and new
items would be created with 660 as per smb.conf
Other thing is to insure that the main group for the
Hi,
You must use ACL's.
Your Kernel+FileSystem must suport it and samba must have been compiled with
acl support.
But just one personnal remark, the path you're trying to walk (many
different permissions at different directory levels) is a dangerous one.
Trust me.
I've been there, done that, and
On 10/19/05, Jack Malone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am wondering if there is a way I can setup permission on
directories in the directory that I have setup for samba shares so
that no one can move or delete them. The problem I am having of late
is that someone from within windows will move the
At 09:05 AM 10/19/2005, Josh Kelley wrote:
On 10/19/05, Jack Malone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am wondering if there is a way I can setup permission on
directories in the directory that I have setup for samba shares so
that no one can move or delete them. The problem I am having of late
is
Hi Paul,
You probably want to ensure you have EXT3 ACL support on your server, if
it isn't already.. not sure if Redhate Enterprise supports this out of
the box.
I've found that editing permissions from a Windows NT 4.0 box leads to
acls being set incorrectly on Samba - use win2k or higher.
You
2003. november 13. 19.40 dtummal Christian Nabski ezt rta:
We want to copy files with the group in the admin list of the [homes]
share. The problem is that the copied files then are owned by root.
I know this is normal unix behavior. However we want the copied files to
be owned by the user of
Hi Aaron,
Thanks for your answer.
I already set the create mask for files and directories :
for files 0600 -- user can only write and read
for directories 0700 -- directories can be read and entered (executed) by
the user
This however only sets the rights and not the ownership.
The problem
I don't think you really can change that, because the default nature of
Unix is who ever creates a file owns it, no matter what directory it's
in(As long as they have write access to that dir). Samba just does a
remote-local mapping that grant the remote user whatever access they
are mapped to,
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Christian Nabski wrote:
Hi Aaron,
Thanks for your answer.
I already set the create mask for files and directories :
for files 0600 -- user can only write and read
for directories 0700 -- directories can be read and entered (executed) by
the user
This however only
So the only way to do this would be like in my initial mail ?
in [homes] :
root preexec = chown -R %S %P
John H Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 14/11/2003 02:34:06:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Christian Nabski wrote:
Hi Aaron,
Thanks for your answer.
I already set the create mask
hi, see example but chmod -R 0777 /files/pub on linux before
note this maybe a security problem
## Section - [files]
[files]
readonly = No
cscpolicy = disable
comment = public files
browseable = yes
writeable = yes
path = /files/pub
guestok = yes
- Original Message -
From:
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 07:17, rob wrote:
Hi
i'm using samba as a file print server on suse 7.3, clients are windoze
95,2K,XP.
basic problem is that sometimes the files created from a windows client have
a ownership of root, this causes problems mainly with backup programs (as it
What I've done to try to address this (and it seems to be working) is to:
1. add all of the users to a common group
2. chown the directory above the file to the group
3. chmod -R g+s the directory above the file
4. addinherit permissions = yes to smb.conf
-Original Message-
From:
I know I've seen the answer to this problem, even this week.
Have you searched the mail archives? It had something to do with
setting the sticky bit on the directory.
Search and you will find.
Josh
-Original Message-
From: kumar annamalai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
-Original Message-
From: Bradley W. Langhorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 5:12 PM
To: David McBride
Cc: Samba email list (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [Samba] file permissions
On Thu, 2002-04-25 at 17:41, David McBride wrote:
I have got my Samba file shareing
you need to join admin and joe to the smbusers group
and set the permissions on user1 and user2 to at least 775
for that to happen.
Does this mean add them to the admins group? I have already done that, if
it means something different can you please give more detailed explanation.
nope i
48 matches
Mail list logo
