Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?

2004-10-21 Thread Holger Krull
When you didn't , try unplug the network cable from the switch. After 
them this delaying problem will not occur. It sounds like a  madness, 
butit works. Of course you can't print, but the dialog box opens 
immediately.  Where is then the problem?
You always have the posibility to setup your printer like a it would 
print to lpt1 and later change the print port to your samba server queue.
You will loose the posibility to see who is in the queue before you, but 
the delays are gone. Choose your poison.

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?

2004-06-11 Thread Brian Merrell
 We use AutoCAD 2000, 2002,  2004 with RH E3.0 and Samba 3.0.2-6.3E with
no
 delays in saving or printing and have achieved better performance than the
 previous W2k server.  With a little more information we might be able to
 assist in finding the bottleneck.

 Terry


AutoCad 2002 seems to work very very fast, but only one workstation in the
office has 2002 installed.  Can you tell me what kernel you are using and
which filesystems you have on your shares?  Are you using ReiserFS?

Thanks,
Brian.

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?

2004-06-09 Thread Rashkae
Hi.

Does your new system use ReiserFS?

When these ~20 second delays happen, can you see if there's a spike of
System CPU time useage on the server?

I've not heard of it happening over a network share, but some poorly
behaved applications can trigger a 'feature', (actually, a
performance optimization) with ReiserFS on Newer (2.6) kernels that
will make the kernel spin it's wheels for a number of seconds.  If
this might be the case for you, you can disable it by mounting a
ReiserFS volume with a nolargeio=1 option.  (If you want to test this,
it appears to to be safe to remount.  That is, mount /home -o
remount,nolargeio=1 As an example.)

On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 12:26:25PM -0600, Brian Merrell wrote:
 I just came across some very interesting information.
 
 We samba running on an old HP PIII 900.  I just plugged it back in and we
 opened some backup files we
 had on it.  It works just fine with AutoCad.
 
 Linux gatekeeper 2.4.26 #5 Mon Apr 19 07:15:24 MDT 2004 i686 Pentium III
 (Coppermine) GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
 
 Samba Version 2.2.8a
 
 Our new machine is a Dual Opteron machine.
 
 Linux fileserv 2.6.5-gentoo-r1 #3 Sat May 29 13:32:03 MDT 2004 x86_64 5
 GNU/Linux
 
 Samba Version Version 3.0.2a
 
 The difference is that I need the hard drive space on our new server versus
 the 40 gigs we have on the older machine.
 
 The smb.conf file on the old machine is very very basic:
 
 [global]
 
 workgroup = TRISTATE
 security = SHARE
 
 [backup]
 
 path = /usr/backup
 writeable = Yes
 guest ok = Yes
 
 
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Brian Merrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 12:07 PM
 Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?
 
 
  Terry, Thanks a lot for your reply.  We're really trying to solve this
  problem.
 
 
   Brian,
  
  
   1.   Which release of AutoCAD are you using?
 
  Autodesk Land Desktop 2004
  2004.0.0
  Service Pack 1
 
  
   2.   Are the support files for AutoCAD on the client or the server?
  
 
  On the clients.
 
   3.   Are you using cups?
  
 
  No.
 
   4.   Is it true that your plotter settings are not being saved with the
   drawing?  Was this true when you were using a windows server?
  
 
  They are being saved with the drawings.  They were also being saved with
  the drawings on the windows server.  (the windows server was actually just
  another client that shared it's HD).
 
   5.   Normally when AutoCAD is opening the print dialog box in an
 existing
   drawing, it is trying to find the printer that was used by the last
  session
   of Autocad. If it can't find that printer, it produces the printer
 none.
   Are you loading your printers from the server such that each client has
  the
   identical printer name?
  
 
  First of all, you're right.  The print dialog only produces the printer
  none when it's a new drawing.
  Otherwise, it saves the print settings.  But we still experience a delay
  independant of whether we
  are printing from a new drawing or an existing one.  The printers aren't
 on
  the server, and we do
  not have identical printer name.
 
   6.   Are the network directories being used by AutoCAD the same as being
   used by the other programs that don't exhibit the long save times?
  
 
  No.  AutoCad drawings are stored on a seperate harddrive and a different
  directory.  However,
  after reading this e-mail I moved a TIF image to the autocad directory and
  opened them from
  Adobe Photoshop.  I then modified and saved the drawing and there was no
  delay.  There was also no
  delay for opening a print dialog.  The problem continues to be only with
  AutoCad.
 
 
   We use AutoCAD 2000, 2002,  2004 with RH E3.0 and Samba 3.0.2-6.3E with
  no
   delays in saving or printing and have achieved better performance than
 the
   previous W2k server.  With a little more information we might be able to
   assist in finding the bottleneck.
  
   Terry
  
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
  Behalf
   Of Bob Turner
   Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 10:45 AM
   To: 'Brian Merrell'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: RE: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?
  
   Brian
  
   I might suggest a couple of setting changes on your XP machines:
  
   1) Open services and stop/disable Web Client
   2) Open windows explorer, go to toolsfolder options, click the View
 tab,
   and uncheck the Automatically search for network folders and printers
  
   (I'm assuming Windows XP Professional on these settings)
  
   Restart and try your printers again.
  
   Bob
  
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Brian Merrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 9:50 AM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?
  
   Thanks for your response Jerry.
  
   Yes.  These are all windows XP machines.  We have about four printers
 here
   in the office (all HP hehe).  Only two computers have McAfee Firewalls
   installed

Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?

2004-06-09 Thread Brian Merrell
Yes I am user reiserFS on the AutoCad Shares (Jerry, are you?)
The older machine is running ext3.

The CPU usage goes up, but I definately wouldn't call it a spike.
It goes to about 1% which is probably normal.

I did use the nolargeio=1 option and it did increase performance.. but..

I tried timing the time it takes to save.  It takes the older machine about
1.25 seconds
to save a 606KB drawing and it takes ~3 seconds for the new fancy machine.

Could this be due to ReiserFS?


- Original Message - 
From: Rashkae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brian Merrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 7:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?


 Hi.

 Does your new system use ReiserFS?

 When these ~20 second delays happen, can you see if there's a spike of
 System CPU time useage on the server?

 I've not heard of it happening over a network share, but some poorly
 behaved applications can trigger a 'feature', (actually, a
 performance optimization) with ReiserFS on Newer (2.6) kernels that
 will make the kernel spin it's wheels for a number of seconds.  If
 this might be the case for you, you can disable it by mounting a
 ReiserFS volume with a nolargeio=1 option.  (If you want to test this,
 it appears to to be safe to remount.  That is, mount /home -o
 remount,nolargeio=1 As an example.)

 On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 12:26:25PM -0600, Brian Merrell wrote:
  I just came across some very interesting information.
 
  We samba running on an old HP PIII 900.  I just plugged it back in and
we
  opened some backup files we
  had on it.  It works just fine with AutoCad.
 
  Linux gatekeeper 2.4.26 #5 Mon Apr 19 07:15:24 MDT 2004 i686 Pentium III
  (Coppermine) GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
 
  Samba Version 2.2.8a
 
  Our new machine is a Dual Opteron machine.
 
  Linux fileserv 2.6.5-gentoo-r1 #3 Sat May 29 13:32:03 MDT 2004 x86_64 5
  GNU/Linux
 
  Samba Version Version 3.0.2a
 
  The difference is that I need the hard drive space on our new server
versus
  the 40 gigs we have on the older machine.
 
  The smb.conf file on the old machine is very very basic:
 
  [global]
 
  workgroup = TRISTATE
  security = SHARE
 
  [backup]
 
  path = /usr/backup
  writeable = Yes
  guest ok = Yes
 
 
 
 
  - Original Message - 
  From: Brian Merrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 12:07 PM
  Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?
 
 
   Terry, Thanks a lot for your reply.  We're really trying to solve this
   problem.
  
  
Brian,
   
   
1.   Which release of AutoCAD are you using?
  
   Autodesk Land Desktop 2004
   2004.0.0
   Service Pack 1
  
   
2.   Are the support files for AutoCAD on the client or the server?
   
  
   On the clients.
  
3.   Are you using cups?
   
  
   No.
  
4.   Is it true that your plotter settings are not being saved with
the
drawing?  Was this true when you were using a windows server?
   
  
   They are being saved with the drawings.  They were also being saved
with
   the drawings on the windows server.  (the windows server was actually
just
   another client that shared it's HD).
  
5.   Normally when AutoCAD is opening the print dialog box in an
  existing
drawing, it is trying to find the printer that was used by the last
   session
of Autocad. If it can't find that printer, it produces the printer
  none.
Are you loading your printers from the server such that each client
has
   the
identical printer name?
   
  
   First of all, you're right.  The print dialog only produces the
printer
   none when it's a new drawing.
   Otherwise, it saves the print settings.  But we still experience a
delay
   independant of whether we
   are printing from a new drawing or an existing one.  The printers
aren't
  on
   the server, and we do
   not have identical printer name.
  
6.   Are the network directories being used by AutoCAD the same as
being
used by the other programs that don't exhibit the long save times?
   
  
   No.  AutoCad drawings are stored on a seperate harddrive and a
different
   directory.  However,
   after reading this e-mail I moved a TIF image to the autocad directory
and
   opened them from
   Adobe Photoshop.  I then modified and saved the drawing and there was
no
   delay.  There was also no
   delay for opening a print dialog.  The problem continues to be only
with
   AutoCad.
  
  
We use AutoCAD 2000, 2002,  2004 with RH E3.0 and Samba 3.0.2-6.3E
with
   no
delays in saving or printing and have achieved better performance
than
  the
previous W2k server.  With a little more information we might be
able to
assist in finding the bottleneck.
   
Terry
   
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
   Behalf
Of Bob Turner
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 10:45 AM
To: 'Brian Merrell'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] Samba just Slow

Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?

2004-06-09 Thread Brian Merrell
The time it takes to save seems to get worse the longer drawing is open and
being used.  We're already back to seeing 10 second saves this morning.

I will probably try using ext3 instead of reiserFS this weekend, unless
someone out there has AutoCad working fine with reiserFS this is
my best guess as to what the problem is.


- Original Message - 
From: Brian Merrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?


 Yes I am user reiserFS on the AutoCad Shares (Jerry, are you?)
 The older machine is running ext3.

 The CPU usage goes up, but I definately wouldn't call it a spike.
 It goes to about 1% which is probably normal.

 I did use the nolargeio=1 option and it did increase performance.. but..

 I tried timing the time it takes to save.  It takes the older machine
about
 1.25 seconds
 to save a 606KB drawing and it takes ~3 seconds for the new fancy
machine.

 Could this be due to ReiserFS?


 - Original Message - 
 From: Rashkae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Brian Merrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 7:56 AM
 Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?


  Hi.
 
  Does your new system use ReiserFS?
 
  When these ~20 second delays happen, can you see if there's a spike of
  System CPU time useage on the server?
 
  I've not heard of it happening over a network share, but some poorly
  behaved applications can trigger a 'feature', (actually, a
  performance optimization) with ReiserFS on Newer (2.6) kernels that
  will make the kernel spin it's wheels for a number of seconds.  If
  this might be the case for you, you can disable it by mounting a
  ReiserFS volume with a nolargeio=1 option.  (If you want to test this,
  it appears to to be safe to remount.  That is, mount /home -o
  remount,nolargeio=1 As an example.)
 
  On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 12:26:25PM -0600, Brian Merrell wrote:
   I just came across some very interesting information.
  
   We samba running on an old HP PIII 900.  I just plugged it back in and
 we
   opened some backup files we
   had on it.  It works just fine with AutoCad.
  
   Linux gatekeeper 2.4.26 #5 Mon Apr 19 07:15:24 MDT 2004 i686 Pentium
III
   (Coppermine) GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
  
   Samba Version 2.2.8a
  
   Our new machine is a Dual Opteron machine.
  
   Linux fileserv 2.6.5-gentoo-r1 #3 Sat May 29 13:32:03 MDT 2004 x86_64
5
   GNU/Linux
  
   Samba Version Version 3.0.2a
  
   The difference is that I need the hard drive space on our new server
 versus
   the 40 gigs we have on the older machine.
  
   The smb.conf file on the old machine is very very basic:
  
   [global]
  
   workgroup = TRISTATE
   security = SHARE
  
   [backup]
  
   path = /usr/backup
   writeable = Yes
   guest ok = Yes
  
  
  
  
   - Original Message - 
   From: Brian Merrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 12:07 PM
   Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?
  
  
Terry, Thanks a lot for your reply.  We're really trying to solve
this
problem.
   
   
 Brian,


 1.   Which release of AutoCAD are you using?
   
Autodesk Land Desktop 2004
2004.0.0
Service Pack 1
   

 2.   Are the support files for AutoCAD on the client or the
server?

   
On the clients.
   
 3.   Are you using cups?

   
No.
   
 4.   Is it true that your plotter settings are not being saved
with
 the
 drawing?  Was this true when you were using a windows server?

   
They are being saved with the drawings.  They were also being saved
 with
the drawings on the windows server.  (the windows server was
actually
 just
another client that shared it's HD).
   
 5.   Normally when AutoCAD is opening the print dialog box in an
   existing
 drawing, it is trying to find the printer that was used by the
last
session
 of Autocad. If it can't find that printer, it produces the printer
   none.
 Are you loading your printers from the server such that each
client
 has
the
 identical printer name?

   
First of all, you're right.  The print dialog only produces the
 printer
none when it's a new drawing.
Otherwise, it saves the print settings.  But we still experience a
 delay
independant of whether we
are printing from a new drawing or an existing one.  The printers
 aren't
   on
the server, and we do
not have identical printer name.
   
 6.   Are the network directories being used by AutoCAD the same as
 being
 used by the other programs that don't exhibit the long save times?

   
No.  AutoCad drawings are stored on a seperate harddrive and a
 different
directory.  However,
after reading this e-mail I moved a TIF image to the autocad
directory
 and
opened them from
Adobe Photoshop.  I then modified and saved the drawing and there
was
 no
delay

Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?

2004-06-09 Thread Rashkae
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 10:18:22AM -0600, Brian Merrell wrote:

 
  I tried timing the time it takes to save.  It takes the older machine
 about
  1.25 seconds
  to save a 606KB drawing and it takes ~3 seconds for the new fancy
 machine.
 
  Could this be due to ReiserFS?
 

In my experience, and by every benchmark measure I've seen so far,
ReiserFS performance is far superior to ext3.  The problem I mentioned
that gets fixed with nolargeio option is a bizare abnomally.
Reportedly, it affects older versions of Kmail and the Linux version
of NeverWinter Nights.  I thought it would be worth trying.

Since that was obviously not the problem, I'll let the real Samba
experts take back the floor :)

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?

2004-06-08 Thread Brian Merrell
No good.  It's still amazingly slow.  It seems to perform just fine until
the user tries to print.  There is a huge delay before the print dialog
comes up, and when the user tries to save there is another huge delay.  The
problem seems to be only with AutoCad.

- Original Message - 
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brian Merrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?


 On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 08:59:34AM -0600, Brian Merrell wrote:
 
  Here are some smb.conf's I have tried:
  (I have tried SO_SNDBUF=8192, and 4096)

 Remove these two parameters.

  read prediction = true
  strict sync = yes

 Hope this helps,

 Jeremy.


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?

2004-06-08 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Merrell wrote:
| No good.  It's still amazingly slow.  It seems to perform
| just fine until the user tries to print.  There is a huge
| delay before the print dialog comes up, and when the user
| tries to save there is another huge delay.  The
| problem seems to be only with AutoCad.
Sorry I'm late on this thread.
Are these XP clients?  Do the clients have a
active firewall installed.  If the delay is only
when printing, it is probabl either
(a) a very chatty printer driver, or
(b) timeouts when the client tries to
~open a print change notify handle.

cheers, jerry
- --
Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com
SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org
GnuPG Key   http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home. --- Sting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFAxcznIR7qMdg1EfYRAicSAKDPzwf0vrIpsTgrln1hFnUlZ/VVOgCfXjs8
XYq6cwr7pC7oqkM0DHab0eU=
=I89Z
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?

2004-06-08 Thread Brian Merrell
Thanks for your response Jerry.

Yes.  These are all windows XP machines.  We have about four printers here
in the office (all HP hehe).  Only two computers have McAfee Firewalls
installed, the rest do not have firewalls.  We are on a 100 mbps ethernet
with a 16 port hub.  Nothing too fancy.

AutoCad is a strange beast.  No matter what printer you have set up as your
default printer, when you click the print icon or give the print command,
AutoCad comes up with no printer selected in the print dialog, and the user
selects the plotter each time (although you can save your print selections
for each drawing).  I have even tried setting the default printer to the
PDF distiller and it still takes the same ammount of time for the print
dialog to come up.

However, I was just tinkering with the print settings and noticed that the
print dialog comes up normally some times.  i.e. If you click cancel on the
print dialog and then hit the print icon again quickly, it seems to come up
normally.

The other mysterious problem is the time it takes to save.  I just saw a guy
behind me try to save a drawing and it took about 20 seconds.  Something
that never happened before when the files were hosted on an older windows XP
machine with a heavier load.

I'm all out of ideas and really don't want to go back to windows.

brian.





- Original Message - 
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brian Merrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 8:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?


 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Brian Merrell wrote:
 | No good.  It's still amazingly slow.  It seems to perform
 | just fine until the user tries to print.  There is a huge
 | delay before the print dialog comes up, and when the user
 | tries to save there is another huge delay.  The
 | problem seems to be only with AutoCad.

 Sorry I'm late on this thread.

 Are these XP clients?  Do the clients have a
 active firewall installed.  If the delay is only
 when printing, it is probabl either

 (a) a very chatty printer driver, or
 (b) timeouts when the client tries to
 ~open a print change notify handle.




 cheers, jerry
 - --
 Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key   http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 ...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home. --- Sting
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

 iD8DBQFAxcznIR7qMdg1EfYRAicSAKDPzwf0vrIpsTgrln1hFnUlZ/VVOgCfXjs8
 XYq6cwr7pC7oqkM0DHab0eU=
 =I89Z
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?

2004-06-08 Thread Paul Gienger
Do you have any dns service running?  Even if you're running some files 
based stuff (/etc/hosts) make sure that your address match names.  I've 
had issues where they didn't match up before. 

Follow me here...  a machine running dhcp registered itself in dns with 
a particular address.  That user then was given a static address with a 
different name.  The user didn't change his computer name to match dns 
when he went to static, and his machine didn't change its dns 
registration, so it was reporting itself as a name which matched a black 
hole IP address (because it wasn't sitting there any more).  You could 
see in the logs where the samba spooler service would time out trying to 
access the dead address/name combo, and eventually windows would just 
time out and give you the printer box.

Brian Merrell wrote:
Thanks for your response Jerry.
Yes.  These are all windows XP machines.  We have about four printers here
in the office (all HP hehe).  Only two computers have McAfee Firewalls
installed, the rest do not have firewalls.  We are on a 100 mbps ethernet
with a 16 port hub.  Nothing too fancy.
AutoCad is a strange beast.  No matter what printer you have set up as your
default printer, when you click the print icon or give the print command,
AutoCad comes up with no printer selected in the print dialog, and the user
selects the plotter each time (although you can save your print selections
for each drawing).  I have even tried setting the default printer to the
PDF distiller and it still takes the same ammount of time for the print
dialog to come up.
However, I was just tinkering with the print settings and noticed that the
print dialog comes up normally some times.  i.e. If you click cancel on the
print dialog and then hit the print icon again quickly, it seems to come up
normally.
The other mysterious problem is the time it takes to save.  I just saw a guy
behind me try to save a drawing and it took about 20 seconds.  Something
that never happened before when the files were hosted on an older windows XP
machine with a heavier load.
I'm all out of ideas and really don't want to go back to windows.
brian.


- Original Message - 
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brian Merrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 8:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?

 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Merrell wrote:
| No good.  It's still amazingly slow.  It seems to perform
| just fine until the user tries to print.  There is a huge
| delay before the print dialog comes up, and when the user
| tries to save there is another huge delay.  The
| problem seems to be only with AutoCad.
Sorry I'm late on this thread.
Are these XP clients?  Do the clients have a
active firewall installed.  If the delay is only
when printing, it is probabl either
(a) a very chatty printer driver, or
(b) timeouts when the client tries to
~open a print change notify handle.

cheers, jerry
- --
Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com
SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org
GnuPG Key   http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home. --- Sting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFAxcznIR7qMdg1EfYRAicSAKDPzwf0vrIpsTgrln1hFnUlZ/VVOgCfXjs8
XYq6cwr7pC7oqkM0DHab0eU=
=I89Z
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
   

 

--
Paul Gienger Office:701-281-1884
Applied Engineering Inc. Cell:  701-306-6254
Information Systems Consultant   Fax:   701-281-1322
URL: www.ae-solutions.commailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?

2004-06-08 Thread Brian Merrell
I am not using Samba's print service.  All of the individual workstations
have shared printers.  We simply use those.


- Original Message - 
From: Paul Gienger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brian Merrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?


 Do you have any dns service running?  Even if you're running some files
 based stuff (/etc/hosts) make sure that your address match names.  I've
 had issues where they didn't match up before.

 Follow me here...  a machine running dhcp registered itself in dns with
 a particular address.  That user then was given a static address with a
 different name.  The user didn't change his computer name to match dns
 when he went to static, and his machine didn't change its dns
 registration, so it was reporting itself as a name which matched a black
 hole IP address (because it wasn't sitting there any more).  You could
 see in the logs where the samba spooler service would time out trying to
 access the dead address/name combo, and eventually windows would just
 time out and give you the printer box.

 Brian Merrell wrote:

 Thanks for your response Jerry.
 
 Yes.  These are all windows XP machines.  We have about four printers
here
 in the office (all HP hehe).  Only two computers have McAfee Firewalls
 installed, the rest do not have firewalls.  We are on a 100 mbps ethernet
 with a 16 port hub.  Nothing too fancy.
 
 AutoCad is a strange beast.  No matter what printer you have set up as
your
 default printer, when you click the print icon or give the print command,
 AutoCad comes up with no printer selected in the print dialog, and the
user
 selects the plotter each time (although you can save your print
selections
 for each drawing).  I have even tried setting the default printer to the
 PDF distiller and it still takes the same ammount of time for the print
 dialog to come up.
 
 However, I was just tinkering with the print settings and noticed that
the
 print dialog comes up normally some times.  i.e. If you click cancel on
the
 print dialog and then hit the print icon again quickly, it seems to come
up
 normally.
 
 The other mysterious problem is the time it takes to save.  I just saw a
guy
 behind me try to save a drawing and it took about 20 seconds.  Something
 that never happened before when the files were hosted on an older windows
XP
 machine with a heavier load.
 
 I'm all out of ideas and really don't want to go back to windows.
 
 brian.
 
 
 
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Brian Merrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 8:27 AM
 Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?
 
 
 
 
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Brian Merrell wrote:
 | No good.  It's still amazingly slow.  It seems to perform
 | just fine until the user tries to print.  There is a huge
 | delay before the print dialog comes up, and when the user
 | tries to save there is another huge delay.  The
 | problem seems to be only with AutoCad.
 
 Sorry I'm late on this thread.
 
 Are these XP clients?  Do the clients have a
 active firewall installed.  If the delay is only
 when printing, it is probabl either
 
 (a) a very chatty printer driver, or
 (b) timeouts when the client tries to
 ~open a print change notify handle.
 
 
 
 
 cheers, jerry
 - --
 Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key   http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 ...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home. --- Sting
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
 iD8DBQFAxcznIR7qMdg1EfYRAicSAKDPzwf0vrIpsTgrln1hFnUlZ/VVOgCfXjs8
 XYq6cwr7pC7oqkM0DHab0eU=
 =I89Z
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 
 
 
 
 

 -- 
 Paul Gienger Office: 701-281-1884
 Applied Engineering Inc. Cell: 701-306-6254
 Information Systems Consultant   Fax: 701-281-1322
 URL: www.ae-solutions.commailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?

2004-06-08 Thread Bob Turner
Brian

I might suggest a couple of setting changes on your XP machines:

1) Open services and stop/disable Web Client
2) Open windows explorer, go to toolsfolder options, click the View tab,
and uncheck the Automatically search for network folders and printers

(I'm assuming Windows XP Professional on these settings)

Restart and try your printers again.

Bob



-Original Message-
From: Brian Merrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 9:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?

Thanks for your response Jerry.

Yes.  These are all windows XP machines.  We have about four printers here
in the office (all HP hehe).  Only two computers have McAfee Firewalls
installed, the rest do not have firewalls.  We are on a 100 mbps ethernet
with a 16 port hub.  Nothing too fancy.

AutoCad is a strange beast.  No matter what printer you have set up as your
default printer, when you click the print icon or give the print command,
AutoCad comes up with no printer selected in the print dialog, and the user
selects the plotter each time (although you can save your print selections
for each drawing).  I have even tried setting the default printer to the
PDF distiller and it still takes the same ammount of time for the print
dialog to come up.

However, I was just tinkering with the print settings and noticed that the
print dialog comes up normally some times.  i.e. If you click cancel on the
print dialog and then hit the print icon again quickly, it seems to come up
normally.

The other mysterious problem is the time it takes to save.  I just saw a guy
behind me try to save a drawing and it took about 20 seconds.  Something
that never happened before when the files were hosted on an older windows XP
machine with a heavier load.

I'm all out of ideas and really don't want to go back to windows.

brian.





- Original Message - 
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brian Merrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 8:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?


 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Brian Merrell wrote:
 | No good.  It's still amazingly slow.  It seems to perform
 | just fine until the user tries to print.  There is a huge
 | delay before the print dialog comes up, and when the user
 | tries to save there is another huge delay.  The
 | problem seems to be only with AutoCad.

 Sorry I'm late on this thread.

 Are these XP clients?  Do the clients have a
 active firewall installed.  If the delay is only
 when printing, it is probabl either

 (a) a very chatty printer driver, or
 (b) timeouts when the client tries to
 ~open a print change notify handle.




 cheers, jerry
 - --
 Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key   http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 ...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home. --- Sting
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

 iD8DBQFAxcznIR7qMdg1EfYRAicSAKDPzwf0vrIpsTgrln1hFnUlZ/VVOgCfXjs8
 XYq6cwr7pC7oqkM0DHab0eU=
 =I89Z
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?

2004-06-08 Thread Terry L. Eleiott
Brian,


1.   Which release of AutoCAD are you using?

2.   Are the support files for AutoCAD on the client or the server?

3.   Are you using cups?

4.   Is it true that your plotter settings are not being saved with the
drawing?  Was this true when you were using a windows server?

5.   Normally when AutoCAD is opening the print dialog box in an existing
drawing, it is trying to find the printer that was used by the last session
of Autocad. If it can't find that printer, it produces the printer none.
Are you loading your printers from the server such that each client has the
identical printer name?

6.   Are the network directories being used by AutoCAD the same as being
used by the other programs that don't exhibit the long save times?

We use AutoCAD 2000, 2002,  2004 with RH E3.0 and Samba 3.0.2-6.3E with no
delays in saving or printing and have achieved better performance than the
previous W2k server.  With a little more information we might be able to
assist in finding the bottleneck.

Terry

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Bob Turner
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 10:45 AM
To: 'Brian Merrell'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?

Brian

I might suggest a couple of setting changes on your XP machines:

1) Open services and stop/disable Web Client
2) Open windows explorer, go to toolsfolder options, click the View tab,
and uncheck the Automatically search for network folders and printers

(I'm assuming Windows XP Professional on these settings)

Restart and try your printers again.

Bob



-Original Message-
From: Brian Merrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 9:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?

Thanks for your response Jerry.

Yes.  These are all windows XP machines.  We have about four printers here
in the office (all HP hehe).  Only two computers have McAfee Firewalls
installed, the rest do not have firewalls.  We are on a 100 mbps ethernet
with a 16 port hub.  Nothing too fancy.

AutoCad is a strange beast.  No matter what printer you have set up as your
default printer, when you click the print icon or give the print command,
AutoCad comes up with no printer selected in the print dialog, and the user
selects the plotter each time (although you can save your print selections
for each drawing).  I have even tried setting the default printer to the
PDF distiller and it still takes the same ammount of time for the print
dialog to come up.

However, I was just tinkering with the print settings and noticed that the
print dialog comes up normally some times.  i.e. If you click cancel on the
print dialog and then hit the print icon again quickly, it seems to come up
normally.

The other mysterious problem is the time it takes to save.  I just saw a guy
behind me try to save a drawing and it took about 20 seconds.  Something
that never happened before when the files were hosted on an older windows XP
machine with a heavier load.

I'm all out of ideas and really don't want to go back to windows.

brian.





- Original Message - 
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brian Merrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 8:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?


 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Brian Merrell wrote:
 | No good.  It's still amazingly slow.  It seems to perform
 | just fine until the user tries to print.  There is a huge
 | delay before the print dialog comes up, and when the user
 | tries to save there is another huge delay.  The
 | problem seems to be only with AutoCad.

 Sorry I'm late on this thread.

 Are these XP clients?  Do the clients have a
 active firewall installed.  If the delay is only
 when printing, it is probabl either

 (a) a very chatty printer driver, or
 (b) timeouts when the client tries to
 ~open a print change notify handle.




 cheers, jerry
 - --
 Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key   http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 ...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home. --- Sting
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

 iD8DBQFAxcznIR7qMdg1EfYRAicSAKDPzwf0vrIpsTgrln1hFnUlZ/VVOgCfXjs8
 XYq6cwr7pC7oqkM0DHab0eU=
 =I89Z
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http

Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?

2004-06-08 Thread Brian Merrell
Terry, Thanks a lot for your reply.  We're really trying to solve this
problem.


 Brian,


 1.   Which release of AutoCAD are you using?

Autodesk Land Desktop 2004
2004.0.0
Service Pack 1


 2.   Are the support files for AutoCAD on the client or the server?


On the clients.

 3.   Are you using cups?


No.

 4.   Is it true that your plotter settings are not being saved with the
 drawing?  Was this true when you were using a windows server?


They are being saved with the drawings.  They were also being saved with
the drawings on the windows server.  (the windows server was actually just
another client that shared it's HD).

 5.   Normally when AutoCAD is opening the print dialog box in an existing
 drawing, it is trying to find the printer that was used by the last
session
 of Autocad. If it can't find that printer, it produces the printer none.
 Are you loading your printers from the server such that each client has
the
 identical printer name?


First of all, you're right.  The print dialog only produces the printer
none when it's a new drawing.
Otherwise, it saves the print settings.  But we still experience a delay
independant of whether we
are printing from a new drawing or an existing one.  The printers aren't on
the server, and we do
not have identical printer name.

 6.   Are the network directories being used by AutoCAD the same as being
 used by the other programs that don't exhibit the long save times?


No.  AutoCad drawings are stored on a seperate harddrive and a different
directory.  However,
after reading this e-mail I moved a TIF image to the autocad directory and
opened them from
Adobe Photoshop.  I then modified and saved the drawing and there was no
delay.  There was also no
delay for opening a print dialog.  The problem continues to be only with
AutoCad.


 We use AutoCAD 2000, 2002,  2004 with RH E3.0 and Samba 3.0.2-6.3E with
no
 delays in saving or printing and have achieved better performance than the
 previous W2k server.  With a little more information we might be able to
 assist in finding the bottleneck.

 Terry

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
 Of Bob Turner
 Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 10:45 AM
 To: 'Brian Merrell'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?

 Brian

 I might suggest a couple of setting changes on your XP machines:

 1) Open services and stop/disable Web Client
 2) Open windows explorer, go to toolsfolder options, click the View tab,
 and uncheck the Automatically search for network folders and printers

 (I'm assuming Windows XP Professional on these settings)

 Restart and try your printers again.

 Bob



 -Original Message-
 From: Brian Merrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 9:50 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?

 Thanks for your response Jerry.

 Yes.  These are all windows XP machines.  We have about four printers here
 in the office (all HP hehe).  Only two computers have McAfee Firewalls
 installed, the rest do not have firewalls.  We are on a 100 mbps ethernet
 with a 16 port hub.  Nothing too fancy.

 AutoCad is a strange beast.  No matter what printer you have set up as
your
 default printer, when you click the print icon or give the print command,
 AutoCad comes up with no printer selected in the print dialog, and the
user
 selects the plotter each time (although you can save your print selections
 for each drawing).  I have even tried setting the default printer to the
 PDF distiller and it still takes the same ammount of time for the print
 dialog to come up.

 However, I was just tinkering with the print settings and noticed that the
 print dialog comes up normally some times.  i.e. If you click cancel on
the
 print dialog and then hit the print icon again quickly, it seems to come
up
 normally.

 The other mysterious problem is the time it takes to save.  I just saw a
guy
 behind me try to save a drawing and it took about 20 seconds.  Something
 that never happened before when the files were hosted on an older windows
XP
 machine with a heavier load.

 I'm all out of ideas and really don't want to go back to windows.

 brian.





 - Original Message - 
 From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Brian Merrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 8:27 AM
 Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?


  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  Hash: SHA1
 
  Brian Merrell wrote:
  | No good.  It's still amazingly slow.  It seems to perform
  | just fine until the user tries to print.  There is a huge
  | delay before the print dialog comes up, and when the user
  | tries to save there is another huge delay.  The
  | problem seems to be only with AutoCad.
 
  Sorry I'm late on this thread.
 
  Are these XP clients?  Do the clients have a
  active firewall installed.  If the delay is only
  when printing, it is probabl either

RE: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?

2004-06-08 Thread David Brodbeck
Make sure your network doesn't have any problems with mismatched duplex
settings, excessive collisions, etc.  I had this problem once and it
crippled anything that tried to copy a large file to the server.  It showed
up worst with AutoCAD because it generated the most network traffic.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?

2004-06-07 Thread John Mazza
I would try turning off the Strict sync option.  I would also test it with the 
oplock 
options disabled as well.


On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:59:34 -0600, Brian Merrell wrote:

This is from 1998:

We've had serious performance problems loading AutoCAD R14 .dwg files from
a
VAResearch VArServer 3000 (dual 400MHz PII, Red Hat 5.0, SAMBA 1.9.17p4,
256MB RAM, 36GB RAID5). The problem is that on first access, trying to read
the .dwg file is very, very slow

This is from 1999:

A friend of mine just had a big problem with Samba, which we eventually
solved. The problem was that NT clients did well on a copy in a command
prompt, but were terribly slow when opening the same file in Autocad.

(Compared to serving the file from an NT server).

The solution was well hidden in dejanews and the Samba documentation
somewhere; we had to set
socket options = SO_SNDBUF=4096 SO_RCVBUF=4096

I have found a couple of other people complaining about performance with
AutoCad.  I have tried the above fix, and I did not notice any difference
whatsoever.  I have also tried generic speed fixes like this:
http://www.dd.iij4u.or.jp/~okuyamak/Documents/tuning.english.html to no
avail.

This is very important to our company, and I may be forced to use a windows
server if I cannot resolve this problem.  We had our files on a Windows XP
machine (with worse hardware than we are using now) and it was running quite
a bit faster than the Samba server we have now.  The speed problem, however,
only seems to be with AutoCad.

Here are some smb.conf's I have tried:
(I have tried SO_SNDBUF=8192, and 4096)

[global]

workgroup = TRISTATE
security = USER
netbios name = SERVER
encrypt passwords = Yes
smb passwd file = /etc/samba/private/smbpasswd


oplocks = true
ole locking compatibility = no
read prediction = true
strict sync = yes

socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=2920

hosts allow = 127.0.0.1 10.0.0.0/24
hosts deny = 0.0.0.0/0



[Drawings]

path = /fileservice/drawings
writeable = Yes
browseable = Yes
read only = No
guest ok = No
comment = autocad related files and misc files
valid users = drafter

[Topowork]

path = /fileservice/topowork
writeable = Yes
browseable = Yes
read only = No
guest ok = No
comment = adobe related files
valid users = drafter

AND:

[global]

workgroup = TRISTATE
security = USER
netbios name = SERVER
encrypt passwords = Yes
smb passwd file = /etc/samba/private/smbpasswd

[Drawings]

path = /fileservice/drawings
writeable = Yes
browseable = Yes
read only = No
guest ok = No
comment = autocad related files and misc files
valid users = drafter

[Topowork]

path = /fileservice/topowork
writeable = Yes
browseable = Yes
read only = No
guest ok = No
comment = adobe related files
valid users = drafter



Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Brian Merrell

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?

2004-06-07 Thread Brian Merrell
Thanks for the response, John.  I had two smb.confs listed.  The first (the
one you're refering too had some fixes that I had found through google).
But my original smb.conf was listed below.  I will also post it here:

[global]

workgroup = TRISTATE
security = USER
netbios name = SERVER
encrypt passwords = Yes
smb passwd file = /etc/samba/private/smbpasswd

[Drawings]

path = /fileservice/drawings
writeable = Yes
browseable = Yes
read only = No
guest ok = No
comment = autocad related files and misc files
valid users = drafter

[Topowork]

path = /fileservice/topowork
writeable = Yes
browseable = Yes
read only = No
guest ok = No
comment = adobe related files
valid users = drafter


- Original Message - 
From: John Mazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 9:05 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?


 I would try turning off the Strict sync option.  I would also test it
with the oplock
 options disabled as well.


 On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:59:34 -0600, Brian Merrell wrote:

 This is from 1998:
 
 We've had serious performance problems loading AutoCAD R14 .dwg files
from
 a
 VAResearch VArServer 3000 (dual 400MHz PII, Red Hat 5.0, SAMBA 1.9.17p4,
 256MB RAM, 36GB RAID5). The problem is that on first access, trying to
read
 the .dwg file is very, very slow
 
 This is from 1999:
 
 A friend of mine just had a big problem with Samba, which we eventually
 solved. The problem was that NT clients did well on a copy in a command
 prompt, but were terribly slow when opening the same file in Autocad.
 
 (Compared to serving the file from an NT server).
 
 The solution was well hidden in dejanews and the Samba documentation
 somewhere; we had to set
 socket options = SO_SNDBUF=4096 SO_RCVBUF=4096
 
 I have found a couple of other people complaining about performance with
 AutoCad.  I have tried the above fix, and I did not notice any difference
 whatsoever.  I have also tried generic speed fixes like this:
 http://www.dd.iij4u.or.jp/~okuyamak/Documents/tuning.english.html to no
 avail.
 
 This is very important to our company, and I may be forced to use a
windows
 server if I cannot resolve this problem.  We had our files on a Windows
XP
 machine (with worse hardware than we are using now) and it was running
quite
 a bit faster than the Samba server we have now.  The speed problem,
however,
 only seems to be with AutoCad.
 
 Here are some smb.conf's I have tried:
 (I have tried SO_SNDBUF=8192, and 4096)
 
 [global]
 
 workgroup = TRISTATE
 security = USER
 netbios name = SERVER
 encrypt passwords = Yes
 smb passwd file = /etc/samba/private/smbpasswd
 
 
 oplocks = true
 ole locking compatibility = no
 read prediction = true
 strict sync = yes
 
 socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=2920
 
 hosts allow = 127.0.0.1 10.0.0.0/24
 hosts deny = 0.0.0.0/0
 
 
 
 [Drawings]
 
 path = /fileservice/drawings
 writeable = Yes
 browseable = Yes
 read only = No
 guest ok = No
 comment = autocad related files and misc files
 valid users = drafter
 
 [Topowork]
 
 path = /fileservice/topowork
 writeable = Yes
 browseable = Yes
 read only = No
 guest ok = No
 comment = adobe related files
 valid users = drafter
 
 AND:
 
 [global]
 
 workgroup = TRISTATE
 security = USER
 netbios name = SERVER
 encrypt passwords = Yes
 smb passwd file = /etc/samba/private/smbpasswd
 
 [Drawings]
 
 path = /fileservice/drawings
 writeable = Yes
 browseable = Yes
 read only = No
 guest ok = No
 comment = autocad related files and misc files
 valid users = drafter
 
 [Topowork]
 
 path = /fileservice/topowork
 writeable = Yes
 browseable = Yes
 read only = No
 guest ok = No
 comment = adobe related files
 valid users = drafter
 
 
 
 Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
 Brian Merrell
 
 -- 
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


 -- 
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?

2004-06-07 Thread Brian Merrell
John, (Sorry for the duplicate, but I wanted to send this to the list also)

I'm running version  3.0.2a

and just for the record,

[EMAIL PROTECTED] bean # uname -a
Linux fileserv 2.6.5-gentoo-r1 #3 Sat May 29 13:32:03 MDT 2004 x86_64 5
GNU/Linux

Thanks,
Brian.


- Original Message - 
From: John Mazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 9:05 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?


 I would try turning off the Strict sync option.  I would also test it
with the oplock
 options disabled as well.


 On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 08:59:34 -0600, Brian Merrell wrote:

 This is from 1998:
 
 We've had serious performance problems loading AutoCAD R14 .dwg files
from
 a
 VAResearch VArServer 3000 (dual 400MHz PII, Red Hat 5.0, SAMBA 1.9.17p4,
 256MB RAM, 36GB RAID5). The problem is that on first access, trying to
read
 the .dwg file is very, very slow
 
 This is from 1999:
 
 A friend of mine just had a big problem with Samba, which we eventually
 solved. The problem was that NT clients did well on a copy in a command
 prompt, but were terribly slow when opening the same file in Autocad.
 
 (Compared to serving the file from an NT server).
 
 The solution was well hidden in dejanews and the Samba documentation
 somewhere; we had to set
 socket options = SO_SNDBUF=4096 SO_RCVBUF=4096
 
 I have found a couple of other people complaining about performance with
 AutoCad.  I have tried the above fix, and I did not notice any difference
 whatsoever.  I have also tried generic speed fixes like this:
 http://www.dd.iij4u.or.jp/~okuyamak/Documents/tuning.english.html to no
 avail.
 
 This is very important to our company, and I may be forced to use a
windows
 server if I cannot resolve this problem.  We had our files on a Windows
XP
 machine (with worse hardware than we are using now) and it was running
quite
 a bit faster than the Samba server we have now.  The speed problem,
however,
 only seems to be with AutoCad.
 
 Here are some smb.conf's I have tried:
 (I have tried SO_SNDBUF=8192, and 4096)
 
 [global]
 
 workgroup = TRISTATE
 security = USER
 netbios name = SERVER
 encrypt passwords = Yes
 smb passwd file = /etc/samba/private/smbpasswd
 
 
 oplocks = true
 ole locking compatibility = no
 read prediction = true
 strict sync = yes
 
 socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=2920
 
 hosts allow = 127.0.0.1 10.0.0.0/24
 hosts deny = 0.0.0.0/0
 
 
 
 [Drawings]
 
 path = /fileservice/drawings
 writeable = Yes
 browseable = Yes
 read only = No
 guest ok = No
 comment = autocad related files and misc files
 valid users = drafter
 
 [Topowork]
 
 path = /fileservice/topowork
 writeable = Yes
 browseable = Yes
 read only = No
 guest ok = No
 comment = adobe related files
 valid users = drafter
 
 AND:
 
 [global]
 
 workgroup = TRISTATE
 security = USER
 netbios name = SERVER
 encrypt passwords = Yes
 smb passwd file = /etc/samba/private/smbpasswd
 
 [Drawings]
 
 path = /fileservice/drawings
 writeable = Yes
 browseable = Yes
 read only = No
 guest ok = No
 comment = autocad related files and misc files
 valid users = drafter
 
 [Topowork]
 
 path = /fileservice/topowork
 writeable = Yes
 browseable = Yes
 read only = No
 guest ok = No
 comment = adobe related files
 valid users = drafter
 
 
 
 Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
 Brian Merrell
 
 -- 
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


 -- 
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba just Slow with AutoCad?

2004-06-07 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 08:59:34AM -0600, Brian Merrell wrote:
 
 Here are some smb.conf's I have tried:
 (I have tried SO_SNDBUF=8192, and 4096)

Remove these two parameters.

 read prediction = true
 strict sync = yes

Hope this helps,

Jeremy.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba