Hi,
On 2022-04-26 02:06, jitesh pandey wrote:
Ok, thanks for reply, now take a look at the following, maybe you
could find something into it
*scanimage --list-devices
device `kyocera_gdi_a3:libusb:001:029' is a Kyocera TASKalfa 1800
multi-functional device*
So scanimage list the device as
Hi Till,
On 4/26/22 22:22, Till Kamppeter wrote:
WSD (and also eSCL/AirScan) should also also work via USB. You simply
need to install the ipp-usb package, either from your distro or from the
Snap Store.
No, WSD doesn't work over USB. Only eSCL works.
--
Wishes, Alexander Pevzner
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 2:24 PM Povilas Kanapickas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-04-26 17:11, James Ring wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Would there be any objection if I did some work on tidying up the
> > scanimage frontend implementation? Currently, there are some deeply
> > nested parts of the
Hi,
On 2022-04-26 17:11, James Ring wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Would there be any objection if I did some work on tidying up the
> scanimage frontend implementation? Currently, there are some deeply
> nested parts of the scanning code interspersed with ifdefs that make
> it pretty hard to follow.
WSD (and also eSCL/AirScan) should also also work via USB. You simply
need to install the ipp-usb package, either from your distro or from the
Snap Store.
With this your printer/scanner gets available on localhost:6 (with
your browser you get the web admin interface there) and with
You say you are using "official driver" but if this scanner is WSD
compliant, then try installing SANE-AirScan. It will not hurt to try.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 2:06 AM jitesh pandey wrote:
> Ok, thanks for reply, now take a look at the following, maybe you could
> find something into it
>
>
>
oops sorry I did not notice that one is USB only, so WSD will not work.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 11:14 AM Mark Dm wrote:
> You say you are using "official driver" but if this scanner is WSD
> compliant, then try installing SANE-AirScan. It will not hurt to try.
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 2:06
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 7:12 AM James Ring wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Would there be any objection if I did some work on tidying up the
> scanimage frontend implementation? Currently, there are some deeply
> nested parts of the scanning code interspersed with ifdefs that make
> it pretty hard to
Hi all,
Would there be any objection if I did some work on tidying up the
scanimage frontend implementation? Currently, there are some deeply
nested parts of the scanning code interspersed with ifdefs that make
it pretty hard to follow.
More controversial question, what about writing some parts
Ok, thanks for reply, now take a look at the following, maybe you could
find something into it
*scanimage --list-devicesdevice `kyocera_gdi_a3:libusb:001:029' is a
Kyocera TASKalfa 1800 multi-functional device*
So scanimage list the device as *kyocera_gdi_a3 *but when I test it as
scanimage -d
10 matches
Mail list logo
