[sane-devel] saned refuses to reply

2004-11-19 Thread Olaf Meeuwissen
I was wondering if someone could help me out. Setup: sane-backends-1.0.13 net backend enabled localhost uncommented in net.conf and saned.conf inetd.conf as per saned(8) manual page Problem: saned does not seem to reply (except when in debug mode). What I would expect is

[sane-devel] Tamarack testers wanted (obsoleting the tamarack backend?)

2004-11-19 Thread René Rebe
Hi all, I'm currently doing quite a lot Avision work and noticed that the Tamarack sanners seem to be Avision OEM scanners (as so many others), too. Are here people with these scanners around, who could give a modified avision backend a try?: Artiscan 6000C

[sane-devel] Fujitsu 620c and SANE/Avision

2004-11-19 Thread René Rebe
Hi Garrick, do you still use the Fujitsu 620c with SANE? Can you describe the ADF problem you once had and is it still present with the latest SANE release? Have fun, -- René Rebe - Rubensstr. 64 - 12157 Berlin (Europe / Germany) http://www.exactcode.de |

[sane-devel] Re: Tevion/Medion MD 6190

2004-11-19 Thread Michael Harig
i'm working on it. but my time is limited, so it may need some more weeks... michael

[sane-devel] HP 82xx not unsupported!

2004-11-19 Thread René Rebe
Hi all, I just commited a changeset that adds the IDs for the HP 82xx devices to my Avision backend, as well as removing them from the unsupported.desc. The devices do not yet work well over USB (I guess they work perfectly over SCSI). I'm right now debugging the USB code-path so I hope to fix

[sane-devel] saned refuses to reply

2004-11-19 Thread Jochen Eisinger
Hi, have you tried the troubleshooting section at http://penguin-breeder.org/sane/saned/ ? I'm pretty sure that should solve your problem kind regards -- jochen

[sane-devel] Re: Fujitsu 620c and SANE/Avision

2004-11-19 Thread Garrick Sitongia
Ren=E9, I use the Fujitsu 620c with SANE sp15c driver almost daily. The original ADF problem was: it would eject the page just scanned, then feed the next through without scanning and eject it, then scan the third, etc. So there where two page ejects for each scanned page. It scanned every other