On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 12:59 -0400, Billy Tallis wrote:
> I recently opened up my scanner to find out what chips it uses. I had
> previously submitted it as an unsupported scanner. Is there a form I
> can use to submit the info about the chips in it, or should I just
> post them here? My scanner is
--=-r1thsS9qDMhQIDgT6/Re
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
The Realtek website for the Visioneer 4800 docs seems to be one of those
terminal "will be up soon" sites.
Does anyone know where I can get the instruction set from so I can start
writing a backend
I recently opened up my scanner to find out what chips it uses. I had
previously submitted it as an unsupported scanner. Is there a form I
can use to submit the info about the chips in it, or should I just
post them here? My scanner is a Visioneer onetouch parport scanner
that I now know has an avi
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 03:59, Jon Niehof wrote:
> First off, I apologize for my impatience. Caching the
> calibration certainly makes a difference.
Good to hear ;)
> 300 dpi 230x150mm grey scans, with the lamp left on and thus
> warmup time set to zero:
>
> no caching, full calibration:
> 1m12
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 00:30 +0100, Paul wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting conflicting noises here. The sane website says that the
> Visioneer 4800 isn't supported, yet when I start xsane it is reporting
> the scanner as a Primax Colorado 300 flatbed scanner. Which is correct?
>
> I have a feeling that
--=-jGtIXGmPUoNp6+FFyZ4y
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
I'm getting conflicting noises here. The sane website says that the
Visioneer 4800 isn't supported, yet when I start xsane it is reporting
the scanner as a Primax Colorado 300 flatbed scanner. Which
