bob rjerr...@math.concordia.ab.ca writes:
Hello, I am new to the list. Scanning with gimp 2.2, xsane 0.97 GT-9300,
and the Epson 2400 Photo scanner, regular scanning works fine. But when
the transparency unit is selected the geometry is not automatically set
to the center portion of the bed
Rayudu Addagarla rayud...@gmail.com writes:
Hai
Seems this problem was there in epson backend years back,
see this list from november 2001.
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2001-November/000875.html
I have no other suggestions now, but if i find will post.
The mail
Gerhard Grygiel gryg...@sun52a.desy.de writes:
I tried VueScan but it dosen't work.
The VueScan Linux Release Notes:
If you're using the Epson Perfection 4490 (GT-X750), make sure you
have /usr/lib/libesint54.so from the Epson AVASYS SANE distribution.
You also need to set up the
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 08:54:41AM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
Rayudu Addagarla rayud...@gmail.com writes:
Hai
Seems this problem was there in epson backend years back,
see this list from november 2001.
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2001-November/000875.html
I
Wolfram Heider schrieb:
for the use under Wine the .vxds don't have to be ported to linux. The point
is you should have the original windows scanning-frontend that was shipped
together with the scanner. Do you? Did you run it on the commandline with
'wine /path/to/frontend.exe'? Maybe some
Hi,
I read the mails telling taht the driver is broken now,
but a few months ago someone told here on this list that we had to
upgrade to v. 1.0.15 while SuSE 9.0 provides 1.0.13, (who was exactly
running as mentionned in another mail here: scanning once, then you had
to reboot or so).
My
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 12:03:38PM +0200, Aldo wrote:
My question is: if it is a free time problem, why not working /
investigating on more coworkers? the problem with de LiDE series is,
that they are very very popular, probably because they are cheap and
VERY compact (n.b. that was
There has been an unanswered request about the level of support for
the legendary SF-200/210 before; do they work automatically with the
batch scan option? Or is the way to talk to them another one of the
NDA-guarded secrets of Nikon's? What about LS-1000/SF-100 which can
occasionally be found at
