[sane-devel] Autotools generated files and CVS

2009-01-20 Thread Olaf Meeuwissen
Julien BLACHE jb at jblache.org writes: Olaf Meeuwissen olaf.meeuwissen at avasys.jp wrote: Hi, Not doing so will make for a lot of big commits. And? What's the point? As long as the build system updates are self-contained and not mixed with other changes in the tree, we couldn't care

[sane-devel] HP officejet: access scanner over the network

2009-01-20 Thread Wouter van Marle
Yes this works fine, thanks for the hint! So in the end the solution for me was to change the xsane icon on the desktop to include that extra parameter, and now can scan fine. Luckily I have only three workstations total! Regards, Wouter van Marle On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 13:30 -0600, gobo wrote:

[sane-devel] Autotools generated files and CVS

2009-01-20 Thread Kåre Särs
On Tuesday 20 January 2009, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote: autofoo one has to know. As for the amount of pain involved, I can only think of the time it takes. Julien mentions versioning issues and broken deployment but I have little experience with that. You obviously never had to work with

[sane-devel] [sane-commit] CVS update of sane-backends (4 files)

2009-01-20 Thread Gerhard Jaeger
On Tuesday 20 January 2009 02:41:14 m. allan noah wrote: Date: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 @ 01:41:14 Author: kitno-guest Path: /cvsroot/sane/sane-backends Modified: ChangeLog doc/descriptions-external/brother2.desc include/sane/sanei_thread.h sanei/sanei_thread.c add

[sane-devel] Autotools generated files and CVS

2009-01-20 Thread Julien BLACHE
Olaf Meeuwissen olaf.meeuwissen at avasys.jp wrote: Hi, Acknowledged. It may even be a better approach as several Linux distributions have a habit of running autoreconf --force before that build (and for a good reason). Putting the hack in configure makes at least sure they pick up on it.

[sane-devel] [sane-commit] CVS update of sane-backends (4 files)

2009-01-20 Thread m. allan noah
oh, a mistake. I will back them out now... Sorry. allan On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 3:19 AM, Gerhard Jaeger gerhard at gjaeger.de wrote: On Tuesday 20 January 2009 02:41:14 m. allan noah wrote: Date: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 @ 01:41:14 Author: kitno-guest Path:

[sane-devel] Autotools generated files and CVS

2009-01-20 Thread Chris Bagwell
Julien BLACHE wrote: autofoo one has to know. As for the amount of pain involved, I can only think of the time it takes. Julien mentions versioning issues and broken deployment but I have little experience with that. You obviously never had to work with broken libtool versions, which

[sane-devel] Autotools generated files and CVS

2009-01-20 Thread Julien BLACHE
Chris Bagwell chris at cnpbagwell.com wrote: Hi, So I think its safe to say that you've had some sort of bad experience with some part of the autofoo chain in the past and have settle on Not inside SANE. The most painful experience we've had here was switching to modern autofoo versions