That's good clue indeed.
Also might be better to change the NDEBUG flag in the pixma code to
something more restrictive, like NDEBUGPIXMA
Or ... simply to reconsider this conditional code here and there, as it
was helpful at the time the pixma driver was standalone and not included
into Sane as b
you do same debug logs but while doing an actual
>> scan? Does that work now with the patched libusb from twain-sane (does it
>> generate a good pnm file)?
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http
n/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 2272 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20100628/f72d0d06/attachment.bin>
th the patched libusb from twain-sane (does it
>>> generate a good pnm file)?
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20100628/faf328b4/attachment.htm>
scanner working correctly while
in test mode. Can you do same debug logs but while doing an actual scan?
Does that work now with the patched libusb from twain-sane (does it generate
a good pnm file)?
Chris
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20100628/e5be85f9/attachment.htm>
Mattias- would you characterize these patches as being fixes for
missing features of libusb, or fixes for something sane does wrong?
allan
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Mattias Ellert
wrote:
> ons 2010-06-16 klockan 10:16 -0500 skrev Chris Bagwell:
>> Probably binary blob from twain-sane link
Mattias- would you characterize these patches as being fixes for
missing features of libusb, or fixes for something sane does wrong?
allan
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Mattias Ellert
wrote:
> ons 2010-06-16 klockan 10:16 -0500 skrev Chris Bagwell:
>> Probably binary blob from twain-sane link
