On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 17:52 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> I know, but I doubt it supports OS/2 or BeOS :)
Probably never... but never say never I guess :-)
> > I'll try writing the patch today but I just need a scanner where the
> > libsane driver supports buttons. Any recommendations for a cheap
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 13:58 -0400, Martin Owens wrote:
> > with HAL and I don't blame you for not being :-)
>
> Have you checked out some of the interesting comments made in the past?
>
> Will this patch provide a way for programs using HAL to call standard
> methods such as scan or will it be as
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 13:51 -0400, m. allan noah wrote:
> ok, i think i understand the distinction between 5 and 6, you cross
> the system to gui gap using dbus signals between two processes?
That's correct.
> 1. does udev signal HAL on every change to any device in the system,
> or only certain
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 13:03 -0400, m. allan noah wrote:
> > > > i would rather see a more general, non-linux specific method of
> > > > handling buttons. how about a daemon that runs, gets the sane device
> > > > list in the normal way, and then monitors each of the found devices
> > > > for button
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 12:17 -0400, m. allan noah wrote:
> of course, now that i think about it, this idea has the same problem
> of device ownership/locking. i suppose you could change every backend
> to lock open devices (plustek does this already?), and every front-end
> would have to send/accept
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 09:01 -0500, m. allan noah wrote:
> it would be nice if some of the linux gnome devels would engage in
> SANE discussions on the SANE lists. they might learn something about
> the hardware they are trying to support :) button handling comes up
> here quite a bit, you should se
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 12:18 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> David Zeuthen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > So I'm curious if a) you think this is a good idea; and b) whether such
> > a patch would be able to go into mainline SANE? Thanks for considering!
>
> Looks good
On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 10:31 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> David Zeuthen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Is it possible anyone can apply / comment on this? Thanks!
>
> It's in.
Great, thanks a lot! Another thing; one of the things we're looking at
in GNOME is makin
Hi again,
Is it possible anyone can apply / comment on this? Thanks!
David
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 20:27 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 20:22 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> And since my original message is being held for being too big, here&#x
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 20:22 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> Anyway, thanks for considering this patch!
Oops, sorry for including a bunch of noise in the patch. Better version
attached this time. You'll need to manually add the tools/hal dir I
think.
ChangeLog |6 +
10 matches
Mail list logo
