Am 19.02.2013 00:06, schrieb Olaf Meeuwissen:
Stef mentioned:
Regarding SANE, Id' rather stick to
http://www3.sane-project.org/contrib.html
so I took a peek at the mirrors (didn't even realize there were any!)
and noticed their Latest News entries:
www3 2011-02-13
Stef mentioned:
Regarding SANE, Id' rather stick to
http://www3.sane-project.org/contrib.html
so I took a peek at the mirrors (didn't even realize there were any!)
and noticed their Latest News entries:
www3 2011-02-13 SANE-Backends-1.0.22
www2 2005-08-07 SANE-Backends-1.0.16
www1
Dear SANE folks,
Allan wrote in his reply to my message on the mailing list that he
considers downstream reports ?pointless? [1].
Here are my arguments why I consider downstream reports good in addition
to upstream reports. Comments are welcome.
1. Distributions have different issues to deal
On 18/02/2013 15:09, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear SANE folks,
Allan wrote in his reply to my message on the mailing list that he
considers downstream reports ?pointless? [1].
Here are my arguments why I consider downstream reports good in addition
to upstream reports. Comments are welcome.
1.
Dear Stef,
Am Montag, den 18.02.2013, 17:54 +0100 schrieb Stef:
On 18/02/2013 15:09, Paul Menzel wrote:
Allan wrote in his reply to my message on the mailing list that he
considers downstream reports ?pointless? [1].
Here are my arguments why I consider downstream reports good in
