Le Thursday 04 November 2010 20:05:00 stef, vous avez ?crit :
Le Thursday 04 November 2010 15:06:15 m. allan noah, vous avez ?crit :
This patch looks fine to me- Though I would say 'All options' instead
of 'All SANE options'.
allan
Hello,
ok, I'll change that. I think
Le Thursday 04 November 2010 15:06:15 m. allan noah, vous avez ?crit :
This patch looks fine to me- Though I would say 'All options' instead
of 'All SANE options'.
allan
Hello,
ok, I'll change that. I think I'll commit this by next monday with the
according man page
Le Tuesday 02 November 2010 03:57:40 Olaf Meeuwissen, vous avez ?crit :
On 2010?11?02? 09:58, m. allan noah wrote:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Olaf Meeuwissen
olaf.meeuwissen at avasys.jp wrote:
On 2010?11?01? 23:45, stef wrote:
Le Monday 01 November 2010 14:51:59 m. allan noah, vous
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2010?11?01? 23:45, stef wrote:
Le Monday 01 November 2010 14:51:59 m. allan noah, vous avez ?crit :
We need a way for authors of button handling programs to figure out
what sensors a scanner exposes. Yes, they can use libsane to query the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2010?11?02? 09:58, m. allan noah wrote:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Olaf Meeuwissen olaf.meeuwissen at
avasys.jp wrote:
On 2010?11?01? 23:45, stef wrote:
Le Monday 01 November 2010 14:51:59 m. allan noah, vous avez ?crit :
We need a way
I disagree with this commit. Perhaps we need to change what is
printed, but I don't think we should hide them.
allan
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:34 AM, St?phane Voltz stef.dev at free.fr wrote:
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit
Le Monday 01 November 2010 12:47:27 m. allan noah, vous avez ?crit :
I disagree with this commit. Perhaps we need to change what is
printed, but I don't think we should hide them.
allan
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:34 AM, St?phane Voltz stef.dev at free.fr wrote:
The following commit has
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:05 AM, stef stef.dev at free.fr wrote:
Le Monday 01 November 2010 12:47:27 m. allan noah, vous avez ?crit :
I disagree with this commit. Perhaps we need to change what is
printed, but I don't think we should hide them.
allan
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:34 AM, St?phane
Le Monday 01 November 2010 14:51:59 m. allan noah, vous avez ?crit :
We need a way for authors of button handling programs to figure out
what sensors a scanner exposes. Yes, they can use libsane to query the
options, but then a third user would have to install the button
daemon, just to find
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:45 AM, stef stef.dev at free.fr wrote:
Le Monday 01 November 2010 14:51:59 m. allan noah, vous avez ?crit :
We need a way for authors of button handling programs to figure out
what sensors a scanner exposes. Yes, they can use libsane to query the
options, but then a
Le Monday 01 November 2010 15:48:28 m. allan noah, vous avez ?crit :
...
allan
Hello,
I think there are different points to answer. First there is a bug
to fix: the --help argument (which is geared to scanimage command line
usage) shouldn't print command line options
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Olaf Meeuwissen
olaf.meeuwissen at avasys.jp wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2010?11?01? 23:45, stef wrote:
Le Monday 01 November 2010 14:51:59 m. allan noah, vous avez ?crit :
We need a way for authors of button handling programs to
?- Why would a button handling program need a button daemon to find out
if there are any sensors when using libsane if scanimage can do the same
thing using libsane without that button daemon?
It does not- but as I said above- the third party end user might like
to know if his scanner
13 matches
Mail list logo
