Hello,
I have committed a slightly modifed version of your patch in git
repository. I have checked with a GL841 CIS scanner that they are still
working. I'll rely on you to test that the Opticbook 3600 is working like
expected. I have left calibration cache disabled like you did
Hey stef,
I see things seem to be progressing well with the lide 110, good times!
I have recently had a problem with the account I set up the mailing list
with so I have added this account instead. I doubt there will have been
any progress on the plustek drivers, but as I've missed some of the
Cheers Allan, Stef said hes gonna give the code a thorough look through
in a week or so, should be plenty of time for the next release if it is
around your proposed time.
Thanks
Chris
On 06/12/10 15:08, m. allan noah wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Chris Berry wrote:
>
>>> Chris,
Thanks Stef, a week is no problem for me, i'm pretty busy at work at the
minute so a weeks time might work out best for all of us.
Chris
On 06/12/10 19:53, stef wrote:
> Le Monday 06 December 2010 15:54:44 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>
>>> Chris, please go ahead. I think you could remove
Le Monday 06 December 2010 15:54:44 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> > Chris, please go ahead. I think you could remove some of my "Chris
> > why" comments where you know. Should the scanner be added also to the
> > genesys.conf
>
> Definitely here
>
> > and libsane.rules files?
>
> I have never
> Chris, please go ahead. I think you could remove some of my "Chris
> why" comments where you know. Should the scanner be added also to the
> genesys.conf
Definitely here
> and libsane.rules files?
I have never entered in this file, what was the reason behind adding to
it? Or at least what do
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Chris Berry wrote:
>
>> Chris, please go ahead. I think you could remove some of my "Chris why"
>> comments where you know. Should the scanner be added also to the
>> genesys.conf
>
> Definitely here
>>
>> and libsane.rules files?
>
> I have never entered in this fi
Hello Chris,
Am 05.12.2010 19:57, schrieb Chris Berry:
> Hey guys,
>
> So I have looked at Michael's code and tested it with my scanner. Good
> news is this works and is nice and neat (you have saved me a shitty
> job there Michael).
>
> I think it is probably time we committed this to the SANE
Chris
--
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:41:00 +0100
From: Michael Rickmann
Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600
Cc:sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
Message-ID:<4CF3671C.5090607 at gwdg.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hello Chris, hell
Hello Chris, hello everybody else,
I am new here. Thanks to your work, Chris and your sources (
http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update120410 ) I can use
an Optibook 3600 under Sane for scanning in some pics for my lectures.
You can find my current diffs in
http://wwwuser.gwdg.de/~
Le Thursday 25 November 2010 19:57:19 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> Hey all,
>
> Sorry for my absence any of those who were waiting on the support for
> this scanner, I had a massive internet problem then started a new job so
> things got held back. A quick update to the project: I managed to g
On Thu, 2010-11-25 18:57:19 +, Chris Berry wrote:
> One big part of why I didnt merge straight off the original was that I
> was using an IDE to code and it went and screwed all the whitespace up,
> so now I have a diff on every line :(. If anyone has any suggestions
> about how I should
Hey all,
Sorry for my absence any of those who were waiting on the support for
this scanner, I had a massive internet problem then started a new job so
things got held back. A quick update to the project: I managed to get
most of the basic functionality together in my test bed, which still
wor
Le mardi 30 mars 2010 09:53:20 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> Hi Stef, I take it that you have now received my preliminary copy of my
> report. I will send you a completed copy when I am done.
>
> I have a question about the image scans at 1200+ dpi. When attempting
> scans at these resolutions
Hi Stef, I take it that you have now received my preliminary copy of my
report. I will send you a completed copy when I am done.
I have a question about the image scans at 1200+ dpi. When attempting
scans at these resolutions I only get half an image. A little
investigation has led me to find t
Le lundi 22 mars 2010 22:14:11 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> stef wrote:
> > Le lundi 22 mars 2010 07:26:23 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> >> Hi guys, I have included a patch for the plustek 3600. It isnt quite
> >> there yet but at least you can apply it to the current development
> >> versio
stef wrote:
> Le lundi 22 mars 2010 07:26:23 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> Hi guys, I have included a patch for the plustek 3600. It isnt quite
>> there yet but at least you can apply it to the current development
>> version and should be able to test (for those of you with the scanner)
>>
stef wrote:
> Hello,
>
> for the image quality, I think you could concentrate on on full sensor
> resolution and 'half ccd' resolution.
I'm not sure what you mean but I guess full resolution is the maximum
hardware resolution of the scanner? If so then what is 'half ccd'
resolution?
Le jeudi 18 mars 2010 22:14:26 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > in order to properly review the result of your hard work, we need the
> > changes you done as patches. Either against the version you started to
> > modify, or as a git patchset against latest version, which is
> Hello,
>
> in order to properly review the result of your hard work, we need the
> changes
> you done as patches. Either against the version you started to modify, or as a
> git patchset against latest version, which is the best solution. On your site,
> I only found the full source
Le mardi 16 mars 2010 20:02:33 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> On 03/09/2010 05:15 AM, stef wrote:
> > Le lundi 8 mars 2010 17:20:23 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> >> Ok Stef I have a bit more time to concentrate on this at the minute. I
> >> have updated the white_shading.pnm and included it at
On 03/09/2010 05:15 AM, stef wrote:
> Le lundi 8 mars 2010 17:20:23 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> Ok Stef I have a bit more time to concentrate on this at the minute. I
>> have updated the white_shading.pnm and included it at
>> http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update080310 t
Chris and others,
Just a quick thank you for working on this and an offer for taking up any
testing that needs doing (running various debian / Ubuntu machines and have
an Opticbook 3600 rigged up to either a windows xp laptop or a VM).
Where is the source at the moment?
Out of interest, is the
Le lundi 8 mars 2010 17:20:23 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> Ok Stef I have a bit more time to concentrate on this at the minute. I
> have updated the white_shading.pnm and included it at
> http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update080310 there is also
> a copy of the latest scan there
Ok Stef I have a bit more time to concentrate on this at the minute. I
have updated the white_shading.pnm and included it at
http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update080310 there is also
a copy of the latest scan there too. I only have 20 shading lines in the
shading area because the
Le jeudi 4 mars 2010 17:13:12 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> On 03/03/2010 06:03 AM, stef wrote:
...
> Ok thanks guys, this seems to have done the trick! There is now a black
> line down one side of the page (not sure if that is supposed to be there
> or not) and the colours seem to be a bit grai
On 03/03/2010 06:03 AM, stef wrote:
> Le mardi 2 mars 2010 16:40:21 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> Hey guys, I resolved the issue I was having with the dark_shading
>> calibration. The lamp was turning off fine but the | REG03_LAMPPWR in
>> gl842_begin_scan was turning the light back on fo
stef schrieb:
> Le mardi 2 mars 2010 16:40:21 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>> Hey guys, I resolved the issue I was having with the dark_shading
>> calibration. The lamp was turning off fine but the | REG03_LAMPPWR in
>> gl842_begin_scan was turning the light back on for the scan :/ . Having
>> re
Le mardi 2 mars 2010 16:40:21 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> Hey guys, I resolved the issue I was having with the dark_shading
> calibration. The lamp was turning off fine but the | REG03_LAMPPWR in
> gl842_begin_scan was turning the light back on for the scan :/ . Having
> resolved this there is
Hey guys, I resolved the issue I was having with the dark_shading
calibration. The lamp was turning off fine but the | REG03_LAMPPWR in
gl842_begin_scan was turning the light back on for the scan :/ . Having
resolved this there is still a black line down the center of the page.
The black_shadin
Chris Berry schrieb:
> On 02/24/2010 10:33 AM, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
>> stef schrieb:
>>
>>> Le mercredi 24 f?vrier 2010 03:00:16 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>>>
Hey Stef,
I think I have sorted out the white shading data but the black is still
a mystery. I have up
On 02/24/2010 10:33 AM, Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
> stef schrieb:
>
>> Le mercredi 24 f?vrier 2010 03:00:16 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>>
>>> Hey Stef,
>>>
>>> I think I have sorted out the white shading data but the black is still
>>> a mystery. I have uploaded some files to the proj
stef schrieb:
> Le mercredi 24 f?vrier 2010 03:00:16 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>> Hey Stef,
>>
>> I think I have sorted out the white shading data but the black is still
>> a mystery. I have uploaded some files to the project site (here
>> http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update24
Le mercredi 24 f?vrier 2010 03:00:16 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> Hey Stef,
>
> I think I have sorted out the white shading data but the black is still
> a mystery. I have uploaded some files to the project site (here
> http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update240210 ) these are
> a
Hey Stef,
I think I have sorted out the white shading data but the black is still
a mystery. I have uploaded some files to the project site (here
http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update240210 ) these are
at shading lines set to 400 but for the scan to work even a little bit I
need
Le mardi 23 f?vrier 2010 14:48:40 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> stef wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > The shading calibration area is 'under the roof', it is located inside
> > the scanner. You can have a picture of it by doing a scan after setting
> > physical y offset to 0. ie you scan f
stef wrote:
> Le lundi 22 f?vrier 2010 15:09:11, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> On 02/22/2010 06:43 AM, stef wrote:
>>
>>> Le lundi 22 f?vrier 2010 02:09:14 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>>>
> ...
>
>> Hey Stef,
>>
>> Thanks for the awk script, helped a lot. I put the values into a
>> sp
Le lundi 22 f?vrier 2010 15:09:11, vous avez ?crit :
> On 02/22/2010 06:43 AM, stef wrote:
> > Le lundi 22 f?vrier 2010 02:09:14 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
...
>
> Hey Stef,
>
> Thanks for the awk script, helped a lot. I put the values into a
> spreadsheet and got gamma values all around 1.0
On 02/22/2010 06:43 AM, stef wrote:
> Le lundi 22 f?vrier 2010 02:09:14 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> Hey Stef,
>>
>> I think I have isolated the gamma tables from the logs but there is a
>> significant difference; the gamma tables all seem to be sent at once to
>> the scanner. Regs 0x5b
Le lundi 22 f?vrier 2010 02:09:14 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> Hey Stef,
>
> I think I have isolated the gamma tables from the logs but there is a
> significant difference; the gamma tables all seem to be sent at once to
> the scanner. Regs 0x5b and 0x5c are both set to 0x00 and 1536 bytes are
Hey Stef,
I think I have isolated the gamma tables from the logs but there is a
significant difference; the gamma tables all seem to be sent at once to
the scanner. Regs 0x5b and 0x5c are both set to 0x00 and 1536 bytes are
sent to the scanner. I have attached the log file appearances of the
g
Le samedi 20 f?vrier 2010 16:14:02, vous avez ?crit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > regarding the gamma values you can extract the gamma tables sent to your
> > scanner by the windows driver from USB logs. Put them in a spreadsheet,
> > then you can insert the formula used by the genesys backend and c
> Hello,
>
> regarding the gamma values you can extract the gamma tables sent to your
> scanner by the windows driver from USB logs. Put them in a spreadsheet, then
> you can insert the formula used by the genesys backend and compare the
> reference and generated curves.
>
I am no
Le samedi 20 f?vrier 2010 05:06:40, vous avez ?crit :
> On 02/12/2010 08:47 AM, stef wrote:
...
> Hey Stef,
>
> Sorry I haven't been in touch in a while I have been busy. Ok i've
> looked at this and my understanding is that I have to do two things;
> sort the gain values out and the shading calib
On 02/12/2010 08:47 AM, stef wrote:
> Le jeudi 11 f?vrier 2010 19:50:25, vous avez ?crit :
>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am facing the same issues than you while adding support for the
>>> HP3670. I eventually found that one of my decoding script was buggy and
>>> hide most of AFE accesses. I
Le jeudi 11 f?vrier 2010 19:50:25, vous avez ?crit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am facing the same issues than you while adding support for the
> > HP3670. I eventually found that one of my decoding script was buggy and
> > hide most of AFE accesses. I have appended the fixed version. By decoding
> Hello,
>
> I am facing the same issues than you while adding support for the
> HP3670. I
> eventually found that one of my decoding script was buggy and hide most of AFE
> accesses. I have appended the fixed version. By decoding usbsnoop again, you
> may find more AFE writes to be c
Le mardi 9 f?vrier 2010 18:05:15 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> Ok so ive managed to fix the problem with the FLAG being set, the
> REG01_DVDSET part was screwing me up, so im not sure what that was
> about... More details are here
> http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update090210 with
On Tue, 2010-02-09 18:19:51 +, Chris Berry wrote:
> On 02/09/2010 05:24 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-02-09 17:05:15 +, Chris Berry
> > wrote:
> > > Ok so ive managed to fix the problem with the FLAG being set, the
> > > REG01_DVDSET part was screwing me up, so im not sur
On Tue, 2010-02-09 17:05:15 +, Chris Berry wrote:
> Ok so ive managed to fix the problem with the FLAG being set, the
> REG01_DVDSET part was screwing me up, so im not sure what that was
> about... More details are here
> http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update090210 with a
Yea thanks guys for all the support so far, if you are interested there
are scans available on the project website. As soon as the
brightness/red colour is sorted i should (hopefully) be in a position to
release to the development. From reading the lists I think we are
probably going to be look
Ok so ive managed to fix the problem with the FLAG being set, the
REG01_DVDSET part was screwing me up, so im not sure what that was
about... More details are here
http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update090210 with a new
attachment of the scanning image.
The scans now have a red t
Hey Stef, did you manage to have a look at the patch I sent you? I
havent had much time to look at the project over the last few days so
not much has happened, i'm still getting black scans from the scanner
when I remove the NO_CALIBRATION flag. Have you any idea which function
will be causing
Le mercredi 3 f?vrier 2010 01:48:11, vous avez ?crit :
> On 02/02/2010 05:29 AM, stef wrote:
...
> > Stef
>
> Cheers for the advice again stef, I just added the half ccd flag and it
> sorted out the image as it should look. The only issue now is that the
> scan seems a little dark, again ill u
On 02/02/2010 05:29 AM, stef wrote:
> Le lundi 1 f?vrier 2010 13:52:30 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> On 01/31/2010 09:21 PM, stef wrote:
>>
>>> Le dimanche 31 janvier 2010 20:30:58 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>>>
Ok Stef, ignore that last email, I just got a scan! it
Le lundi 1 f?vrier 2010 13:52:30 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> On 01/31/2010 09:21 PM, stef wrote:
> > Le dimanche 31 janvier 2010 20:30:58 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> >> Ok Stef, ignore that last email, I just got a scan! its far from perfect
> >> but im on the right road at least (mostly
On 01/31/2010 09:21 PM, stef wrote:
> Le dimanche 31 janvier 2010 20:30:58 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> Ok Stef, ignore that last email, I just got a scan! its far from perfect
>> but im on the right road at least (mostly your advice ;) ). One of my
>> GPIO wasnt set correctly and you we
Le dimanche 31 janvier 2010 20:30:58 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> Ok Stef, ignore that last email, I just got a scan! its far from perfect
> but im on the right road at least (mostly your advice ;) ). One of my
> GPIO wasnt set correctly and you were right about the bit 8 being set on
> the con
Ok Stef, ignore that last email, I just got a scan! its far from perfect
but im on the right road at least (mostly your advice ;) ). One of my
GPIO wasnt set correctly and you were right about the bit 8 being set on
the control reg of the AFE.
An upload of the image is at
http://sites.google.c
On 01/31/2010 01:11 PM, stef wrote:
> Le samedi 30 janvier 2010 15:29:50 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>
> Hello,
>
> the function you wrote is fine. What I wanted to share is that it is
> easier
> to do experiments from within a really simple test program than the full blown
> sc
Le samedi 30 janvier 2010 15:29:50 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> On 01/30/2010 01:40 PM, stef wrote:
> > Le jeudi 28 janvier 2010 11:26:56 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> >> No stef im almost certain this isnt a Wolfson, from an old project page
> >> I think it is an Analog Digital 9826
> >>
>
Le jeudi 28 janvier 2010 11:26:56 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> No stef im almost certain this isnt a Wolfson, from an old project page
> I think it is an Analog Digital 9826
>
> Link:
> http://www.analog.com/en/audiovideo-products/cameracamcorder-analog-front-e
> nds/ad9826/products/product.ht
On 01/30/2010 01:40 PM, stef wrote:
> Le jeudi 28 janvier 2010 11:26:56 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> No stef im almost certain this isnt a Wolfson, from an old project page
>> I think it is an Analog Digital 9826
>>
>> Link:
>> http://www.analog.com/en/audiovideo-products/cameracamcorder
No stef im almost certain this isnt a Wolfson, from an old project page
I think it is an Analog Digital 9826
Link:
http://www.analog.com/en/audiovideo-products/cameracamcorder-analog-front-ends/ad9826/products/product.html
I too am puzzled why there are so many writes to the frontend, the XP2
Le jeudi 28 janvier 2010 02:15:01 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> Hey stef, i'm really struggling to work out what all these frontend
> writes are for. Below is a grep of the frontends from a scan, I have
> done several scans and they all roughly follow this format. I'm not sure
> why the offset (
Hey stef, i'm really struggling to work out what all these frontend
writes are for. Below is a grep of the frontends from a scan, I have
done several scans and they all roughly follow this format. I'm not sure
why the offset (regs 05 - 07) have values 0x80 and 0xff and the values
for both offse
Le dimanche 24 janvier 2010 16:32:44, vous avez ?crit :
> --- On Sun, 1/24/10, Chris Berry wrote:
> > From: Chris Berry
> > Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600
> > To: "stef" , sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> > Date: Sunday, J
stef wrote:
> Le vendredi 22 janvier 2010 17:57:06 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
>
>> Hey Stef, I had to take a little time off the front end stuff to do some
>> documentation but Im looking at it again now. Like you im fairly certain
>> everything else is set, could you share with me a snoop o
--- On Sun, 1/24/10, Chris Berry wrote:
> From: Chris Berry
> Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opticbook 3600
> To: "stef" , sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> Date: Sunday, January 24, 2010, 6:01 AM
> stef wrote:
> > Le vendredi 22 janvier
Le vendredi 22 janvier 2010 17:57:06 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> Hey Stef, I had to take a little time off the front end stuff to do some
> documentation but Im looking at it again now. Like you im fairly certain
> everything else is set, could you share with me a snoop of the HP3670?
> I'm cu
Hey Stef, I had to take a little time off the front end stuff to do some
documentation but Im looking at it again now. Like you im fairly certain
everything else is set, could you share with me a snoop of the HP3670?
I'm curious to see the front end entries and whether they follow a
similar pat
Le vendredi 15 janvier 2010 14:19:15 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> Hi Stef, in the course of trying to get the lamp working I was playing
> with the settings and after I removed my changes the lamp functions as i
> expected too so that issue is resolved.
>
> If my understanding is correct the c
Le jeudi 14 janvier 2010 17:47:41 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> Ok quick update, I have managed to get the lamp on during scans! The
> reason it was failing is because reg[0x01] was hard coded to CIS type
> and this is a CCD scanner. Hopefully this means that all I have to do is
> polish up the
Hi Stef, in the course of trying to get the lamp working I was playing
with the settings and after I removed my changes the lamp functions as i
expected too so that issue is resolved.
If my understanding is correct the code should select whether to set cis
or not based on the variable in genesy
Ok quick update, I have managed to get the lamp on during scans! The
reason it was failing is because reg[0x01] was hard coded to CIS type
and this is a CCD scanner. Hopefully this means that all I have to do is
polish up the remaining register values at init time.
Currently the light is on whe
Ok I have set the values for the 0x6b and im still getting a completely
black scan but the lamp is being turned off at the start of a scan.
When the scanner is plugged in the light is ON and when i start a scan
the light is immediately turned off. The init reg is definitely sending
the correct
Le vendredi 8 janvier 2010 04:38:07 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> Thanks for the quick reply stef, hope you had a good christmas/new year :).
>
> I have made changes to the GPIO settings as appropriate (i.e. matched
> the settings to what I believe is correct from register writes) but I
> could
Thanks for the quick reply stef, hope you had a good christmas/new year :).
I have made changes to the GPIO settings as appropriate (i.e. matched
the settings to what I believe is correct from register writes) but I
could only find values for 0x6b, 0x6d, 0x6e and 0x6f. I couldn't find a
write t
Le jeudi 7 janvier 2010 15:14:20 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> Hi Stef,
>
> I have updates on this project at
> http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update070110 with some
> attachments. I am still struggling to work out why the scan lamp is off
> during scanning.
>
> My thoughts are
On Thu, 2010-01-07 17:34:53 +, Chris Berry wrote:
> On 01/07/2010 04:25 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > It's at least great to see someone working on a backend for the
> > '3600. That will be a nice scanner once it's somewhat supported.
> > So I'm having some hope that, at some time, I can u
lol no worries Jan, hopefully I can get the scanner working soon for you :)
Chris
On 01/07/2010 04:25 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-07 14:14:20 +, Chris Berry
> wrote:
>
>> I have updates on this project at
>> http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update070110 w
On Thu, 2010-01-07 14:14:20 +, Chris Berry wrote:
> I have updates on this project at
> http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update070110 with some
> attachments. I am still struggling to work out why the scan lamp is off
> during scanning.
>
> My thoughts are that maybe the gen
Hi Stef,
I have updates on this project at
http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update070110 with some
attachments. I am still struggling to work out why the scan lamp is off
during scanning.
My thoughts are that maybe the genesys backend is saying the lamp sleep
mode if on before th
Ok thanks stef, i've been experimenting a little with the logs, there
was a small error/issue with the parse1.awk script you sent me. I don't
know if you have encountered this but around line 113 there is an if
statement along the lines of:
if ($5 == "0x002]")
this fails because of what I
Le jeudi 24 d?cembre 2009 06:07:23 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> Just a quick update, I had to take a little time off from the project
> but I should be able to work on it more now. I have an update at
> http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update with new log files
> for smaller scan a
Just a quick update, I had to take a little time off from the project
but I should be able to work on it more now. I have an update at
http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/update with new log files
for smaller scan and preview snoops.
Stef is there any chance you could explain the layo
Hi guys,
i'm a little bit stuck with what to do next. I have set up as suggested
in previous mails and now I have an image coming it but it is very
garbled. For image reference please see the project webpage
http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/updates-1/firstattempts/run-genesys.pnm
. If someo
As an update I have added my progress to a weblisting with google. The
webpage can be found at
http://sites.google.com/site/bez625/home
Please see the first attempt post for recent logs, an example image from
the scanner and the code I added to genesys_devices.c. Any comments
would be welcome,
Chris,
You also should download the data sheet for the WM8199 AFE chip (analog front
end). This will help if you need to adjust your DAC_CANONLIDE35 settings.
Jack McGill
--- On Wed, 12/9/09, Chris Berry wrote:
> From: Chris Berry
> Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Backend for plustek Opt
ght be
a way to get those from the snoop logs as well.
So, try to get a few more good snoop logs. Then Stef may be able to suggest
some new CCD, GPO and DAC settings.
Jack McGill
--- On Wed, 12/9/09, Chris Berry wrote:
> From: Chris Berry
> Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Backend for plustek
Le mercredi 9 d?cembre 2009 02:48:52, vous avez ?crit :
> Hey Stef, the script you forwarded to me (decode-pl.sh) seems to be
> reliant on some .awk files (filtre.awk, swap.awk and refait.awk). I had
> a quick look online but could not find them, is there any chance you
> could send them to me :)
>
Hey Stef, the script you forwarded to me (decode-pl.sh) seems to be
reliant on some .awk files (filtre.awk, swap.awk and refait.awk). I had
a quick look online but could not find them, is there any chance you
could send them to me :)
Chris
On 12/07/2009 08:24 PM, stef wrote:
> Le lundi 7 d?cem
Le lundi 7 d?cembre 2009 19:30:15 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> Ok I have managed to use SniffUSB to extract some data during the
> calibration and preview stages, there is too much to post here but im
> not sure how to interpret it. I have tried usb-robot but am struggling
> to get it working (
Ok I have managed to use SniffUSB to extract some data during the
calibration and preview stages, there is too much to post here but im
not sure how to interpret it. I have tried usb-robot but am struggling
to get it working (it tells me there is a problem finding libusb header
which is install
o adding a scanner to the genesys backend, but
it is not complete.
http://sites.google.com/site/roadwarriorscanner/sheetfed-scanner/adding-scanner-genesys-backend.
Good luck.
Jack McGill
--- On Mon, 12/7/09, Chris Berry wrote:
> From: Chris Berry
> Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Bac
Le dimanche 6 d?cembre 2009 20:18:17 Chris Berry, vous avez ?crit :
> Thanks for the info Stef, I have run sane-find-scanner on the scanner
> and it confirms that the chipset is indeed GL482. I was under the
> impression the Genesys backend was for GL481, does it support GL482 as
> well?
>
> Thank
Thanks for the info Stef, I have run sane-find-scanner on the scanner
and it confirms that the chipset is indeed GL482. I was under the
impression the Genesys backend was for GL481, does it support GL482 as
well?
Thanks
Chris
--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Le samedi 5 d?cembre 2009 15:58:42 Janusz S. Bie?, vous avez ?crit :
> On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 Chris Berry wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > As part of a project I am currently undertaking I am creating support
> > for the opticbook 3600 under linux.
>
> [...]
>
> > I am assuming there are no other people
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 Chris Berry wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As part of a project I am currently undertaking I am creating support
> for the opticbook 3600 under linux.
[...]
> I am assuming there are no other people working on this project so far
> (if so please let me know!)
There was an attempt
On Fri, 2009-12-04 11:54:02 +, Chris Berry wrote:
> As part of a project I am currently undertaking I am creating support
> for the opticbook 3600 under linux. It seems the best approach to this
> is to create a SANE backend for the scanner. After reading the available
> documentation I
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
