Hello,
Am 10.11.2010 10:02, schrieb Johannes Meixner:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Nov 9 18:39 Wilhelm wrote (shortened):
>> Am 09.11.2010 17:47, schrieb Johannes Meixner:
>>>
>>> If it really needs HAL, it is probably not very promising
>>> because HAL is meanwhile deprecated.
>>
>> yes, I know that!
>>
>
Hello,
On Nov 9 18:39 Wilhelm wrote (shortened):
> Am 09.11.2010 17:47, schrieb Johannes Meixner:
>>
>> If it really needs HAL, it is probably not very promising
>> because HAL is meanwhile deprecated.
>
> yes, I know that!
>
> But its not scanbd's fault
Of course it is not scanbd's fault!
> B
Hello,
Am 09.11.2010 17:47, schrieb Johannes Meixner:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Nov 9 09:02 m. allan noah wrote:
>> Wilhelm- This looks very promising!
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Wilhelm wrote:
>>> FYI:
>>>
>>> scanbd (scanner button daemon) can be used in such a case:
>>>
>>> 1) scanbd uses
Hello,
On Nov 9 09:02 m. allan noah wrote:
> Wilhelm- This looks very promising!
>
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Wilhelm wrote:
>> FYI:
>>
>> scanbd (scanner button daemon) can be used in such a case:
>>
>> 1) scanbd uses hal dbus-interface ...
If it really needs HAL, it is probably not ver
Am 09.11.2010 15:02, schrieb m. allan noah:
> Wilhelm- This looks very promising!
Thank you!
Well, I posted it 2 years ago with minimal feedback - sadly. But we use
it with our customers very frequently.
>
> allan
>
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Wilhelm wrote:
>> FYI:
>>
>> scanbd (scanne
Yes- Wilhelm and I have been discussing this off list. It appears that
we can get scanbd to be very useful, even without desktop integration
via hal.
allan
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Wilhelm wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am 09.11.2010 17:47, schrieb Johannes Meixner:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Nov 9 09:0
What is the license?
allan
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Wilhelm wrote:
> Am 09.11.2010 15:02, schrieb m. allan noah:
>> Wilhelm- This looks very promising!
>
> Thank you!
>
> Well, I posted it 2 years ago with minimal feedback - sadly. But we use
> it with our customers very frequently.
>
>>
Wilhelm- This looks very promising!
allan
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Wilhelm wrote:
> FYI:
>
> scanbd (scanner button daemon) can be used in such a case:
>
> 1) scanbd uses hal dbus-interface to detect new scanners or scanners
> that vanished (usb plugoff)
>
> 2) scanbd uses dbus to sendout
FYI:
scanbd (scanner button daemon) can be used in such a case:
1) scanbd uses hal dbus-interface to detect new scanners or scanners
that vanished (usb plugoff)
2) scanbd uses dbus to sendout signals if it performs an action (scans
and emails an image e.g). This can be used by desktop-applicat
Thanks for the prompt reply.
It was my error that it didn't respond correctly, and I got it working with
saned using the network protocol.
Works fine now and on my way to make my scanner more useful! :-)
/Mikael
> Is this model not supported when detecting buttons, or am I doing
> something
> >
No problem. Be aware that you have to call the value of the option at
least once every 3 seconds, because the scanner only reports the value
of the press for that long.
Also- all of the sensor values are pulled from the scanner at the same
time, and cached until you call for them. However, the cac
Hi list.
I've tried really hard to find information about how to detect if the button
on my scanner is pressed.
I've got a ScanSnap S1500, which is supported by the fujitsu backend, and
works as expected using for example scanimage.
The scanner itself only has one backlit button titled "scan". If
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Mikael Nordenberg wrote:
> Is this model not supported when detecting buttons, or am I doing something
> completely wrong?
Fortunately, it's the latter. Scanimage is not smart enough to monitor
the buttons exposed by the driver and perform an action when they are
p
13 matches
Mail list logo
