On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 20:41:11 +0100
Stef wrote:
> for me most common frontends are the ones that pop up in the
> mailing list:
> - scanimage
> - xsane
> - scanadf
> - simplescan
>
> I think that checking default frontend installed by various linux
> distributions wi
On 14/03/2014 15:11, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 08:30:39 -0400
> "m. allan noah" wrote:
>
>> There has been little improvement of this situation. There are some
>> commented out frame types for jpeg and ir in the source, and some
>> backends will use them if they are uncommented
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 08:30:39 -0400
"m. allan noah" wrote:
> There has been little improvement of this situation. There are some
> commented out frame types for jpeg and ir in the source, and some
> backends will use them if they are uncommented. But, since they are
> not part of the sane standard
There has been little improvement of this situation. There are some
commented out frame types for jpeg and ir in the source, and some
backends will use them if they are uncommented. But, since they are
not part of the sane standard, most front programs will not handle
them.
allan
On Fri, Mar 14,
Hi All,
Do you have any update on this thread?
This is way back 2006, perhaps it is now supported.
It's about adding frame type for JPEG or other compressed format.
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2006-August/017606.html
Best Regards,
Ariel
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
This e-mail and
Skipped content of type multipart/alternativeFrom yann.morin.1998 at
anciens.enib.fr Sat Aug 26 20:42:11 2006
From: yann.morin.1...@anciens.enib.fr (Yann E. MORIN)
Date: Thu Sep 7 16:04:44 2006
Subject: [sane-devel] [TRANSLATION] French translation update.
Message-ID: <200608262242.11677.yann.mo
e of the options.
agreed. zlib ok?
allan
--
"so don't tell us it can't be done, putting down what you don't know.
money isn't our god, integrity will free our souls" - Max Cavalera
From henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu Wed Aug 23 19:20:50 2006
From: henne...@web.cs.nd
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, m. allan noah wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Ren? Rebe wrote:
>
> > Well that stinks as you lose a lot of detail with the lossy jpeg
> > decompression.
>
> even worse, if you are running the thing over the net backend, you convert
> to huge bitmap just before you transfer it ov
On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 13:35 -0400, m. allan noah wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Ren? Rebe wrote:
>
> >
> > On Aug 22, 2006, at 2:51 PM, m. allan noah wrote:
> >
> >> now that many low-end scanners support jpeg natively (some ONLY do jpeg!)
> >> i
> >> expect we will see more need for this.
> >
>
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Ren? Rebe wrote:
>
> On Aug 22, 2006, at 2:51 PM, m. allan noah wrote:
>
>> now that many low-end scanners support jpeg natively (some ONLY do jpeg!) i
>> expect we will see more need for this.
>
> Oh!
>
>> as a short term fix, rather than adding a new sane_frame type, the ba
- Original Message -
From: "Ren? Rebe"
To: "zf"
Cc: "OrgSane-Devel@Lists. Alioth. Debian."
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 5:19 PM
Subject: (????-????????????)Re: [sane-devel] Image Compression
doesn't support in SANE protocal
> On Aug 22, 200
60822/074cc0df/attachment.htm
From r...@exactcode.de Tue Aug 22 09:19:43 2006
From: r...@exactcode.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Rebe?=)
Date: Tue Aug 22 09:20:44 2006
Subject: [sane-devel] Image Compression doesn't support in SANE protocal
In-Reply-To: <00df01c6c5b1$a6d22130$4300a...@vp.co
12 matches
Mail list logo
