[sane-devel] using scanners unable to USB_AUTOSUSPEND

2013-01-11 Thread Wilhelm
Am 10.01.2013 17:29, schrieb Johannes Meixner: Hello, On Jan 10 16:58 Wilhelm wrote (excerpt): recently I had problems with my old EPSON 1670 Scanner, because it doesn't support usb autosuspend that most distros enable by default in the linux kernel. That causes scanimage or other

[sane-devel] Response to systemd integration, sane-devel Digest, Vol 91, Issue 12

2013-01-11 Thread Michael Watson
Louis, Thank you. When I posted the integration tweaks the service complained on startup as simple with a dbus name. This was solved with changing the type to dbus. I have since settled on type simple and no dbus name, and it's working fine with no complaining. FYI startup and shutdown:

[sane-devel] Response to systemd integration, sane-devel Digest, Vol 91, Issue 12

2013-01-11 Thread Louis Lagendijk
On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 08:38 -0500, Michael Watson wrote: Louis, Thank you. When I posted the integration tweaks the service complained on startup as simple with a dbus name. This was solved with changing the type to dbus. I have since settled on type simple and no dbus name, and it's

[sane-devel] Support for Canon Pixma MG5100 Series

2013-01-11 Thread Rolf Bensch
Hi Patrick, I have no idea about your sine-find-scanner problem. Maybe somebody else on the ml has an idea? A complete pnm scan @ 1200 dpi should work without any problem. Please try to fetch a copy from git and install sane 1.0.24. The installation is described in README.linux. Cheers, Rolf

[sane-devel] Scanbd and /etc/sane.d

2013-01-11 Thread Louis Lagendijk
I am sorry for the long post, but I am afraid that I need to provide a lot of background. The issues As you may recall I am packaging scanbd for Fedora. There are a few issues that make this a bit challenging: 1) In order to create a good user experience, I want the package to

[sane-devel] systemd integration, sane-devel Digest, Vol 91, Issue 13

2013-01-11 Thread Michael Watson
Louis, Thank you. The summary looked at 2 cases, to see if there were any differences between utilizing scanbm.socket or xinetd. They both work. Which one is cleaner/more secure? FYI with version 1.2.1 both scanbd and xinetd were started by /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/99-local.rules: # Scan Button