Hi,
On Wednesday 28 August 2013 20:29:41 coxster dillon wrote:
[...]
Most of time when I get noise
from my LIDE30 is when the head moves back for some alignment to the
sensor. It seems to recover better or rather more often at higher dpi.
I'm a bit confused here (honestly I didn't follow
Hi, thank you for the reply. With the essential help from Gerhard we
seem to have found the issue. See below.
Il giorno mer, 28/08/2013 alle 20.29 +, coxster dillon ha scritto:
The only thing I can think of, that maybe different between Sane on
Linux and Twain on Windoze is simply perhaps
Hi, just for completeness:
Il giorno gio, 29/08/2013 alle 08.11 +0200, Gerhard J?ger ha scritto:
I was concerned more about power since I
noticed when connected into a cable powered hub it actually makes the
noise nearly all the time and other times read errors are produced.
Well, here
Hi Ilya,
is there a special reason using the (old) scanbuttond-backends and not
sane-backends?
If you plugin / poweron the scanner for the first time, who does the
firmware get loaded in this case?
Am 29.08.2013 03:42, schrieb Ilya Ivanchenko:
On Wed, 2013-08-28, Wilhelm wrote:
Am
On Thursday 29 August 2013 08:14:53 Andrea Vai wrote:
Hi, thank you for the reply. With the essential help from Gerhard we
seem to have found the issue. See below.
Il giorno mer, 28/08/2013 alle 20.29 +, coxster dillon ha scritto:
The only thing I can think of, that maybe different
Il giorno gio, 29/08/2013 alle 08.27 +0200, Gerhard J?ger ha scritto:
STOP!
Coxter is talking about a LiDE30! That's why I pointed to another
code section.
ok, sorry, that's clear, but I was following the conversation about the
N650U
While writing the support for LiDE20 and 30 I already
-leak.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 1405 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20130829/ced8ce7e/attachment-0001.patch
Olaf Meeuwissen writes:
Hi all,
I've been chasing a bug where the epson2 backend prevented another
backend from recognizing that backend's supported network scanners.
Turns out that the epson2 backend holds on to file descriptors (and
associated network connections) even if it decides that
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:42:13 +0900
Olaf Meeuwissen olaf.meeuwissen at avasys.jp wrote:
Hi all,
I've been chasing a bug where the epson2 backend prevented another
backend from recognizing that backend's supported network scanners.
Turns out that the epson2 backend holds on to file
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:53:56 +0900
Olaf Meeuwissen olaf.meeuwissen at avasys.jp wrote:
In my particular scenario not closing the file descriptor would prevent
an alternative backend from recognizing the device as supported if its
sane_get_devices() is run after the epson2 one. If their
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Olaf Meeuwissen
olaf.meeuwissen at avasys.jp wrote:
Olaf Meeuwissen writes:
So my question really boils down to whether backends must/should close
any file descriptors opened as a result of calling sane_get_devices().
Thoughts, anyone?
My backends closes
was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20130829/9f156b96/attachment.html
.
Please correct me if I'm wrong here.
--
Wilhelm
w.meier at unix.net
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20130829/c1035439/attachment.html
Hi Ilja,
Am 29.08.2013 15:25, schrieb Ilya V. Ivanchenko:
Hi Wilhelm,
**is there a special reason using the (old) scanbuttond-backends and not
sane-backends?
I first tried sane-backends, and apparently it does not read the buttons
for Epson GT-1500.
did you use the epkowa backend? The
--
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20130829/780263cb/attachment.html
Am 29.08.2013 15:33, schrieb Wilhelm:
Hi Ilja,
Am 29.08.2013 15:25, schrieb Ilya V. Ivanchenko:
Hi Wilhelm,
**is there a special reason using the (old) scanbuttond-backends and not
sane-backends?
I first tried sane-backends, and apparently it does not read the buttons
for Epson GT-1500.
Am 29.08.2013 15:52, schrieb Ilya V. Ivanchenko:
Hi Wilhelm,
is there a special reason using the (old) scanbuttond-backends and not
sane-backends?
I first tried sane-backends, and apparently it does not read the buttons
for Epson GT-1500.
did you use the epkowa backend? The
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20130829/fbb4a285/attachment.html
I have been happily using scanadf with the -S script --script-wait
parameters for a couple of years.
My script converts the image data to pdf, via a call to pnmtops, piped
through ps2pdf.
However recently (I suspect since I updated from Fedora 17 to 19), the
called script hangs, and therefore
Am 29.08.2013 16:03, schrieb Ilya V. Ivanchenko:
2. When using scanbuttond-backends, fix loading firmware on USB insert.
what I could imagine is to fix this problem with a special
shell-callback, when scanbd detects a device inserion / removal.
Forgot to say: would you like to write a patch
the Ubuntu release. It was fantastic to find the exfat driver that came
out for flash drives.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20130829/e1a41a93/attachment.html
21 matches
Mail list logo
