Hi,
I see from the SANE supported devices page that Canoscan scanner models in
the range 3000 - 8400F are unsupported.
Is that still true?
I'm looking for an unsupported model to try some driver dev work as a side
project and I have the opportunity to get my hands on a Canoscan 3000F.
Cheers,
Hi Ralph,
On 10/31/19 8:29 PM, Ralph Little wrote:
> Hi,
> I see from the SANE supported devices page that Canoscan scanner models
> in the range 3000 - 8400F are unsupported.
> Is that still true?
There's some code for 4400F and 5600F, at least some of their features
worked in the past. Most of
So close! Thanks to Kip and Rolf for updating the package.
Still wondering if anyone else has hit this problem on LinuxMint or
elsewhere.
I'm still stuck here with a non-functional scanimage / simplescan.
Anyone have any thoughts/pointers/ideas?
$ SANE_DEBUG_BJNP=5 scanimage -L 2>&1
Hi David,
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 2:45 PM David McMahon wrote:
> ...
> [bjnp] 0050:45 53 3a 43 61 6e 6f 6e 20 4d 46 36 34 32 43 2f
> [bjnp] 0060:36 34 33 43 2f 36 34 34 43 3b
> [bjnp] get_scanner_id: Scanner identity string =
> MFG:CANON;CMD:MFNP1,MultiPASS
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 12:09 PM Povilas Kanapickas
wrote:
>
> There's some code for 4400F and 5600F, at least some of their features
> worked in the past. Most of the features of 8400F and 8600F are
> currently supported as a result of my recent work.
>
>
It looks like I can get a free
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 4:12 PM David McMahon wrote:
>
> Thanks for the clue! Looking on that on the settings page of the printer,
> the hostname is the default of "Canoncbcab3" which seems harmless enough.
> I changed it to "Can" to see if that changed anything, but still getting
> the
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 12:09 PM Povilas Kanapickas
wrote:
>
> Supporting CanoScan 3000F would be a great idea! There's a lot of code
> that currently supports scanners with GL646 chipset. If there's not much
> non-standard behaviour, adding support for this scanner may probably
> take
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 2:56 PM Ralph Little wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 2:45 PM David McMahon wrote:
>
>> ...
>> [bjnp] 0050:45 53 3a 43 61 6e 6f 6e 20 4d 46 36 34 32 43 2f
>> [bjnp] 0060:36 34 33 43 2f 36 34 34 43 3b
>> [bjnp] get_scanner_id: Scanner identity
