Re: [sane-devel] Thank you !

2016-09-16 Thread Roger Sewell

Olaf,

> > > A compressed debug log, preferably over USB, would be helpful.
> > > 
> > >   SANE_DEBUG_EPSON2=128 scanimage [options] 2> debug.log
> > >   xz debug.log
> > > 
> > > should do the trick.

> > Is this still of interest now I've got it working ?

> ...Anyway, why don't you create a log and post it to the list.
> Everyone will be better off with Free-as-in-Freedom support for their
> scanner.  Your log might just be the little bit of info the community
> needs.

Well, I've tried to. But guess what - I cannot make the thing misbehave
at all now !

I have:

   Restored (all sets of) factory defaults on the printer;

   Uninstalled all the things in the following list (i.e. the total list
   of what I had installed), working up from the bottom (and
   reinstalling sane-backends-drivers-scanners and sane-backends-libs
   after taking out sane-backends-devel - but I checked the version was
   the same as it always has been); 

   (This is the list of what I had installed since it wouldn't work:

  libtool-ltdl-2.4.2-20.el7.x86_64 (was already there)
  (updated to) 2.4.2-21.el7_2.x86_64
  
  libtool-ltdl-devel-2.4.2-21.el7_2.x86_64
  atkmm-devel-2.22.7-3.el7.x86_64
  cairomm-devel-1.10.0-8.el7.x86_64
  glibmm24-devel-2.42.0-1.el7.x86_64
  gtkmm24-devel-2.24.2-8.el7.x86_64
  libsigc++20-devel-2.3.1-4.el7.x86_64
  pangomm-devel-2.34.0-3.el7.x86_64   
  sane-backends-1.0.24-9.el7.x86_64
  sane-backends-devel-1.0.24-9.el7.x86_64
  sane-backends-drivers-cameras-1.0.24-9.el7.x86_64
  sane-backends-drivers-scanners-1.0.24-9.el7.x86_64
  imagescan-3.20.0-1epson4centos7.x86_64.rpm
  imagescan-plugin-ocr-engine-1.0.0-1epson4centos7.x86_64.rpm
  imagescan-plugin-networkscan-1.1.0-1epson4centos7.x86_64.rpm )

   Removed the net line from epson2.conf, and added a usb line in its
   place with the same numbers as before;

   Simultaneously powered down both computer and printer/scanner;

   Unplugged the network cable from the printer and plugged in a USB
   cable instead.

And it just will not misbehave !

Alternatively, it may be because the good software has made some change
in settings to the scanner which aren't reverted by "restore factory
defaults". 

Any ideas on what's going on ?

Roger.

-- 
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
 to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org


Re: [sane-devel] Thank you !

2016-09-16 Thread Olaf Meeuwissen

Roger Sewell writes:

> Andrea,
>
>> I also had the same problem with the scanner part of an Epson
>> multifunction printer. I solved it by installing the drivers from the
>> Epson web site, which are indeed almost impossible to find. Here a
>> link: http://download.ebz.epson.net/dsc/search/01/search/searchModule,
>
> Thank you - the package I found there seems to work fine - very grateful.
>
>> Basically I switched the backend form epson2 to epkowa, which comes
>> with the package form the Epson download site. It now works fine at
>> least with Image Scan for Linux (also from the Epson package, although
>> you can install it separate if you want). 
>
> However, I can't find any evidence that a new SANE backend called epkowa
> is being used

The site you downloaded from is a bit confusing.  It provides downloads
for:

 - Image Scan! for Linux (provides epkowa backend)
 - Image Scan v3 (provides imagescan backend)

These aren't the same thing and both cater to different sets of
scanners.  I would assume that Andrea's scanner is supported via Image
Scan! for Linux which includes a SANE epkowa backend.  The Image Scan v3
bundle includes a SANE imagescan backend.

# BTW, Image Scan v3 is a "corporate" rebrand of the Utsushi software
# that I mentioned in an earlier post.  Utsushi provides an utsushi
# backend which, to all intents and purposes, is the same.

> instead it seems to use something at
> /usr/lib64/sane/libsane-imagescan.so.1, despite the fact that
> /etc/sane.d/dll.conf doesn't contain any line enabling that backend.

Quite a few distributions also implicitly include the snippets below
/etc/sane.d/dll.d/ as if they were part of /etc/sane.d/dll.conf.  Both
Image Scan v3 and Utsushi install the configuration file snippets there,
IIRC.  Not sure anymore about Image Scan! for Linux.

# I've been intimately involved in the development and maintenance of
# all three for a long time.  However, as of April 2016 I am no longer
# involved any only keep Utsushi somewhat in sync with Image Scan v3.

> So I don't entirely understand why it works, but I'm glad that it
> does!
>
>> I didn't try it with xsane, but you should be good to go.
>
> Thank you - it works fine with xsane also.

Please note that support for network attached devices with the imagescan
(or utsushi) backends relies on a non-free plugin.  This is despite the
fact that Epsons's Software License Agreement makes you believe the
whole package/bundle is GPLv3.

# I'm off complaining about that now ...

Hope this helps,
-- 
Olaf Meeuwissen, LPIC-2FSF Associate Member since 2004-01-27
 GnuPG key: F84A2DD9/B3C0 2F47 EA19 64F4 9F13  F43E B8A4 A88A F84A 2DD9
 Support Free Softwarehttps://my.fsf.org/donate
 Join the Free Software Foundation  https://my.fsf.org/join


-- 
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
 to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org


[sane-devel] Thank you for help driver CanoScan N656U

2003-01-12 Thread Maurizio Tiecher
I compiled Sane 1.09 on my Linux Red Hat 8.0 live machine and
it worked perfectly with my CanoScan N656U scanner.

I didn't expect it to be so easy, especially on a platform that
doesn't get a whole lot of attention sometimes.

Thank you SANE developers!

Maurizio Tiecher






[sane-devel] Thank you!

2003-01-07 Thread Drew Lane
I compiled Sane 1.09 on my Linux PPC (YDL) machine and
it worked perfectly with my old Relisys Scorpio scanner.

I didn't expect it to be so easy, especially on a platform that
doesn't get a whole lot of attention sometimes.

Thank you SANE developers!

Drew