Re: [sane-devel] Canon LiDE 220 unexpected success

2015-03-15 Thread webmail4
On 15/03/15 07:43, Stef wrote: what is needed is a log recorded when doing a preview when running windows O/S. The log tool to use is usbpcap http://desowin.org/usbpcap/ . Would a Wireshark log help, while running Windows in VirtualBox? I have such a log, however, am not able to generate

Re: [sane-devel] Canon LiDE 220 unexpected success

2015-03-15 Thread Stef
On 14/03/2015 18:12, Jochen wrote: Hi Stef, I understand you're asking for a log from somebody with a LiDE 120 doing a preview. Me, I'd be happy to see my LiDE 120 supported by SANE. So if you tell me what to do and how to even make my LiDE 120 do anything loggable, I'll see if I can provide

Re: [sane-devel] Canon LiDE 220 unexpected success

2015-03-15 Thread Jochen
Hi Stef, I understand you're asking for a log from somebody with a LiDE 120 doing a preview. Me, I'd be happy to see my LiDE 120 supported by SANE. So if you tell me what to do and how to even make my LiDE 120 do anything loggable, I'll see if I can provide that. Unfortunately, I am not much of a

Re: [sane-devel] Canon LiDE 220 unexpected success

2015-02-28 Thread Rafe DiDomenico
That is amazing. You're awesome. So, since this is my first scanner with linux, I have to ask a stupid question: Is there a development repo or do I need to use git to get a sane version with these updates (when they're ready of course)? On 02/26/2015 09:35 PM, Stef wrote: Hello, while

Re: [sane-devel] Canon LiDE 220 unexpected success

2015-02-28 Thread Stef
On 28/02/2015 17:00, Rafe DiDomenico wrote: That is amazing. You're awesome. So, since this is my first scanner with linux, I have to ask a stupid question: Is there a development repo or do I need to use git to get a sane version with these updates (when they're ready of course)? On

Re: [sane-devel] Canon LiDE 220 unexpected success

2015-02-27 Thread Antonio Ladrón de Guevara
Great work Stef! Lot of thanks for your effort Regards. El 26/02/15 a las 21:35, Stef escribió: Hello, while comparing logs between LiDE 210 and LiDE 220, I noticed they were only differing by the ck1map value. After changing this value I had color scan mode working from 75 to 4800 dpi.