Send sanog mailing list submissions to
        sanog@sanog.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.sanog.org/mailman/listinfo/sanog
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        sanog-requ...@sanog.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        sanog-ow...@sanog.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of sanog digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Soliciting suggestions and experiences from the community
      for RPKI-invalid filtering deployment (Lancheng Qin)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 14:14:07 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
From: "Lancheng Qin" <ql...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
To: SANOG <sanog@sanog.org>
Subject: Re: [SANOG] Soliciting suggestions and experiences from the
        community for RPKI-invalid filtering deployment
Message-ID:
        <4cc5ea50.fb67.18a262dc07f.coremail.ql...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi,


Although we strictly guarantee the anonymity of participants in this survey and 
do not disclose their specific information, we also allow participants to 
withdraw their answers.


If you have filled out this questionnaire and do not want your answers to be 
disclosed, please send an email to ql...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn. If not, please 
ignore this email.


Best,
Lancheng


-----????-----
???:"Lancheng Qin" <ql...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
????:2023-05-23 14:40:05 (???)
???: SANOG <sanog@sanog.org>
??:
??: Soliciting suggestions and experiences from the community for RPKI-invalid 
filtering deployment


Hello, we have done a worldwide measurement to identify which ASes have 
propagated RPKI-invalid prefixes. We find an interesting phenomenon that some 
ASes may perform RPKI-invalid filtering only at partial interfaces (e.g., 
provider interfaces, customer interfaces, and peer interfaces). Although there 
are other studies [1, 2] noting the same phenomenon, little is known about why 
some network operators perform different filtering policies at different 
interfaces.


We are trying to figure out the reasons and summarize the optimal deployment 
policy for RPKI-invalid filtering. To this end, we create an anonymous 
questionnaire and hope you can help fill out it.


Questionnaire link: 
https://qfreeaccountssjc1.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe/preview/previewId/70bbaf01-b4a6-4f7d-aac4-33cff5b135a3/SV_dj62hVBXcEy5ryC?Q_CHL=preview&Q_SurveyVersionID=current


Reference:
[1] Help Validate ROV Adoption Measurements from RoVista. 
https://labs.ripe.net/author/tijay-chung/help-validate-rov-adoption-measurements-from-rovista/
[2] 85% of MANRS Members Conformant to Actions 1 and 4. 
https://www.manrs.org/2023/01/85-of-manrs-members-conformant/


If you have any questions, concerns, issues, or comments, please send an email 
to ql...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn


Best,
Lancheng

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://lists.sanog.org/pipermail/sanog/attachments/20230824/d57bf97f/attachment-0001.htm>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
sanog mailing list
sanog@sanog.org
https://lists.sanog.org/mailman/listinfo/sanog


------------------------------

End of sanog Digest, Vol 137, Issue 7
*************************************

Reply via email to