Send sanskrit mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/sanskrit
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of sanskrit digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Sanskrit Quiz # 13 (Vis Tekumalla)
2. Re: Sisupalavadha 13:36 (peekayar)
3. Re: Sisupalavadha 13:36 (peekayar)
4. Re: Sisupalavadha 13:36 (Phillip Ernest)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 13:22:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: Vis Tekumalla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Sanskrit] Sanskrit Quiz # 13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Please send me your responses by April 25. I will post the consolidated answers on the
26th.
Translate 1-2 into Sanskrit:
1. What time is it my dearest, you seem exhausted?
2. Well! Maadhava, are you in love with Maalati?
3. Make up a third line for the following verse:
kokilAnA.m svaro rUpa.m
strINA.m rUpa.m pativratA.m.
...........................
xamA rUpa.m tapasvinA.m..
Meanings for 4-10:
4. yadiha tadanyatra yannehAsti na tat kvAchit.
5. putrIti jAtA mahatIha chi.ntA
kasmai pradeyeti mahAn vitarkaH.
dattvA sukha.m prApsyati vA na veti
kanyApitR^itva.m khalu nAma kaShTam..
6. pinAkaphaNibAlendubhasmamandAkinIyutA.
pavaragarachitA mUrtiH apavarga pradAstu me..
7. Arambha gurvI xayiNI krameNa
laghvI purA vR^iddhimatI cha pashchAt.
dinasya pUrvArdha parArdha bhinnA
ChAyeva maitrI khala sajjanAnAm..
8. yasmAch cha yena cha yadA cha yathA cha yach cha
yAvach cha yatra cha shubhAshubhamAtmakarma.
tasmAch cha tena cha tadA cha tathA cha tat cha
tAvach cha tatra cha kR^itantavashAdupaiti..
9. subhAShitena gItena yuvatInA.m cha lIlayA .
mano na bhidyate yasya sa vaimukto.athavA pashuH..
10. yadi vA yAti govindaH mathurAtaH punaH sakhi.
rAdhAyAH nayana dvandve rAdhA nAma viparyayaH..
...Vis Tekumalla
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/mailman/private/sanskrit/attachments/20040415/fb4c018e/attachment-0001.htm
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 04:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: peekayar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Sanskrit] Sisupalavadha 13:36
To: Phillip Ernest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, sanskrit digest
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
uapayati madhave is a from of use in sanskrit called
sati saptami. It should then become madhave
upayati sati meaning when madhava was approaching the nagaraM etc.
P.K.Ramakrishnan
Phillip Ernest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi guys.
Sisupalavadha 13:36:
adhiruuDhayaa nijaniketamuccakaiH pavanaavadhuutavasanaantayaikayaa|
vihitopazobhamupayaati maadhave nagaraM vyarocata pataakayeva tat||
seems to me to mean something like this:
'As Madhava approached, the city was adorned, as if by a pennon, by a certain
girl who had mounted her own tall house, where the wind made the edges of her
dress tremble.'
I found Mallinatha's commentary a bit hard to understand at first, and
originally took the verb to be impersonal, because of where Mallinatha
positions the phrase upayaati maadhave in the commentary. I thought that he
must mean that nagaraM is the object of upayaati. But I think that nagaraM is
actually the subject of the verb. I hope I am not wrong.
Phillip
_______________________________________________
sanskrit mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/sanskrit
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/mailman/private/sanskrit/attachments/20040416/3f0c2204/attachment-0001.htm
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 07:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: peekayar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Sanskrit] Sisupalavadha 13:36
To: Phillip Ernest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, sanskrit digest
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
After reading the sloka again, I find that nagaram
may well go with vyarochata as - tat nagaram vyarochata. Since Mr. Phillip Ernest has
Mallinatha's
commentary with him I would suggest that he may
reproduce his entire commentary of this shloka for further discussion.
Phillip Ernest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting peekayar
:
> uapayati madhave is a from of use in sanskrit called
> sati saptami. It should then become madhave
> upayati sati meaning when madhava was approaching the nagaraM etc.
So I took it to mean, but I was confused because if nagaraM is taken with the
saptami phrase, the finite verb of the verse is apparently without a subject,
unless the subject is impersonal and therefore unexpressed, or unless nagaraM
actually goes with both the saptami phrase and the finite verb, in which case I
guess it would be an example of the operation of the simhavalokitanyaya or
dipaka recently discussed on Indology Liverpool, perhaps, although I don't
remember the distinction between those two, nor whether either would fit this
verse's circumstances.
I see that I was not clear in my original post. I was wondering whether
nagaraM goes with the present participle upayaati or the finite verb vyarocata.
Phillip
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/mailman/private/sanskrit/attachments/20040416/71723129/attachment-0001.htm
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 12:52:24 -0400
From: Phillip Ernest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Sanskrit] Sisupalavadha 13:36
To: peekayar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, sanskrit digest
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Quoting peekayar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> After reading the sloka again, I find that nagaram
> may well go with vyarochata as - tat nagaram vyarochata. Since Mr. Phillip
> Ernest has Mallinatha's
> commentary with him I would suggest that he may
> reproduce his entire commentary of this shloka for further discussion.
OK:
--begin Mallinatha--
uccakairnijaniketaM svasaudhamadhiruuDhayaa aaruuDhavatyaa pavanenaavadhuutaH
kampito vasanaanto vastraaJcalo yasyaastayaa ekayaakadaacidaGganayaa hetunaa
tannagaramindraprasthaM maadhave upayaatyaagacchati| yaaterlaTaH ZatraadezaH|
pataakayaa vaijayantyaa vihitopazobhaM kRtazobhamivaalaMkRtamivetyutprekSaa|
vyarocata vyaraajata| kRtsnasyaapi nagarasya svayaM pataakeva
babhaavityutprekSaa| tasyaaH sakalapauraaGganaatizaayi laavaNyaM vyajyata
ityalaMkaareNa vastudhvaniH| atraapi praasaadaarohaNaM puurvavatkutuuhalameva
||36||
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
sanskrit mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/sanskrit
End of sanskrit Digest, Vol 13, Issue 12
****************************************
