Send sanskrit mailing list submissions to
sanskrit@cs.utah.edu
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/sanskrit
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
sanskrit-requ...@cs.utah.edu
You can reach the person managing the list at
sanskrit-ow...@cs.utah.edu
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of sanskrit digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: tantra texts for download in sanskrit only? (Ganesan)
2. 'The Wonder that is Sanskrit' (Mohan K.V)
3. Re: Jayati or Jayate (Shreyas P. Munshi)
4. Re: Jayati or Jayate (Vidya R)
5. Re: Jayati or Jayate (Vidya R)
6. mayaaptam raamatvam (P.K.Ramakrishnan)
7. Re: Jayati or Jayate (Shreyas P. Munshi)
8. Satyameva Jayate (Anand)
9. Re: sanskrit Digest, Vol 55, Issue 2 jayate or jayati?
(Phillip Ernest)
10. Re: FW: satyameva ..... (Shreyas P. Munshi)
11. Re: FW: satyameva ..... (Phillip Hill)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 20:55:58 +0530
From: "Ganesan" <gane...@ifpindia.org>
Subject: Re: [Sanskrit] tantra texts for download in sanskrit only?
To: "Sanskrit Mailing List" <sanskrit@cs.utah.edu>
Message-ID: <367975e2121a40ee999c83774afac...@ifpindia.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
My dear Kamaleshji,
I do not think these tantra-s have been entered in e-text format. You seem to
be so ambitious !
Anyway you may try this link:
http://www.muktabodha.org/digital_library.htm
With the best wishes,
Ganesan
Dr.T.Ganesan
Charg? de Recherches
French Institute
11, St. Louis Street
PONDICHERRY-605001
INDIA
Tel: +91 - 413 - 233 4168 ext. 123
E mail: gane...@ifpindia.org
Web: www.ifpindia.org
----- Original Message -----
From: kamalesh pathak
To: sanskrit@cs.utah.edu
Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 3:28 PM
Subject: [Sanskrit] tantra texts for download in sanskrit only?
hello everybody,
namaste and jay somanath.
i want to download all tantra texts only in sanskrit ( no translation
required ) viz.
Uddisha Tantra .or Kaatyaayana Tantra . meru tantra . Kali tantra.
or Rudrayamal or Brahma yamal
or Ravan samhitA etc.
can any one please give me relevant link or
if anyone members have in their own collection -
will please oblige me with copies sending me at -->
kamleshsomn...@gmail.com.
waiting response from the forum.
jay somanath.
kamalesh pathak
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
To UNSUBSCRIBE or customize your subscription or topics of interest, visit
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/mailman/options/sanskrit
and follow instructions.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/pipermail/sanskrit/attachments/20091107/ac78f4d8/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 09:11:33 -0800
From: "Mohan K.V" <kvm.1...@gmail.com>
Subject: [Sanskrit] 'The Wonder that is Sanskrit'
To: sanskrit@cs.utah.edu
Message-ID:
<aebf00a30911070911k4fecbf4bm643410ddae826...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi all,
My Sanskrit teacher found this book, 'The Wonder that is Sanskrit' and gave
us some copies of a chapter today. I thought it would be of use to the
group. Here's a section that is particularly interesting:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/14339015/The-wonder-that-is-Sanskrit
(The Amazon page of the full book: http://www.amazon.com/Wonder-that-
Sanskrit-Sampad-Vijay/dp/1890206504)
The whole section is worth a read, but if you're in a hurry, the last para
in page 46 to page 47 is the most amazing part of it all. It is an example
from the Padukasahasram that has been spoken about here before (the one
with the ya.ya.ya.ya..(ya^32) verse), and solves the Knight's
tour<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knight%27s_tour>problem very nicely,
and makes another verse out of it to boot!
Mohan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/pipermail/sanskrit/attachments/20091107/5ff54a4c/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: 7 Nov 2009 18:18:09 -0000
From: "Shreyas P. Munshi" <shreyasmun...@rediffmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Sanskrit] Jayati or Jayate
To: <jamb...@uwosh.edu>
Cc: sanskrit@cs.utah.edu
Message-ID:
<1257602150.s.10101.34138.f5mail-237-141.rediffmail.com.1257617889.53...@webmail.rediffmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Respected Shri Jambunath-ji Sir,
Thank you very much for your reply. I am happy because you
have actually reproduced the line printed in Devanaagari: ????????????? ?.?.?
??????? ???? ??????? ?????? ????? ????? ???????
People with whom I had discssed this verb, did say that they believed 'jayate'
is of the vedic origin but no one could show it to me in print. The editions
we, all said 'jayati'.
The two editions of the ????????????? which I have seen are some ten years
apart(between 1950 and 1960)and were both published by Geeta Press Gorakhpur
and they both say 'jayati'.
Last year I had spoken to Geeta Press people on phone from Mumbai but they did
not come back; I had then sent an email, followed by a reminder after some two
months but as it has happened, I have not received their response.
Would you, therefore, kindly favour me with the edition year and who the
publisher is from where you have extracted the line ??????? ???? ??????? ??????
????? ????? ???????
Sorry for the trouble I am giving you.
Regards...Shreyas
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:25:50 +0530 wrote
>Dear sri Munshi,It occurs in mudakopanihad.munDakopaniShad.h 3.1.6
satyameva jayate nAnR^itam.h satyena
panthA vivato devayAnaH ????????????? ?.?.?
??????? ???? ??????? ??????
????? ????? ??????? Regards,?????????On Nov 6, 2009, at 9:11 AM, Shreyas P.
Munshi wrote:Shri Jambunath-ji and Shri Naresh Cuntoorji Could you help out
with the Veda referenc where jayate is used and oblige...Shreyas On Fri, 06
Nov 2009 03:00:18 +0530 wrote >> Dear members, > > Sri Naresh cuntoor is
correct. "Satyameva jayate" is allowed because > it > occurs in veda. I
understand that sri panini when such a thing > occurs, says" > iti chandasi"
and allows the usage. > > Regards, > Jambunathan
_______________________________________________ To UNSUBSCRIBE or customize
your subscription or topics of interest, visit
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/mailman/options/sanskrit and follow instructions.
____________________________ Shreyas Munshi shreyasmun...@rediffmail.com C202,
Mandar Apartments, 120 Ft D P Road, Seven Bungalows, Versova, Mumbai 400 061
Tel Res: (22) 26364290 Mob: 981 981 8197
____________________________
Shreyas Munshi
shreyasmun...@rediffmail.com
C202, Mandar Apartments, 120 Ft D P Road,
Seven Bungalows, Versova, Mumbai 400 061
Tel Res: (22) 26364290 Mob: 981 981 8197
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/pipermail/sanskrit/attachments/20091107/150c0201/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 11:27:07 -0800 (PST)
From: Vidya R <imarch...@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Sanskrit] Jayati or Jayate
To: Sanskrit Mailing List <sanskrit@cs.utah.edu>, jamb...@uwosh.edu
Cc: sanskrit@cs.utah.edu
Message-ID: <205489.79174...@web36706.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
namaste!
In Samata Books' 'Sri shaankaragrathaavaliH - upaniShadbhAShyANi' (Volume 8,
Shankara's complete works - Commentaries on the Upanishads), the verse is
provided as:
??????? ???? ???????
?????? ????? ????? ??????? ?
????????????????? ???????????
???? ?????????? ????? ??????? ? ?.?.? ?
??????? -> ?????????
???? -> ????
??????? -> ????????????????
satyameva jayate nAnRutam
satyena panthA vitato devayAnaH |
yenAkramantyRuShayo hyAptakAmA
yatra tatsatyasya paramam nidhAnam || 3.1.6 ||
satyameva -> satyavAneva
jayate -> jayati
nAnRutam -> nAnRutavAdItyarthaH
vidyA
________________________________
From: Shreyas P. Munshi <shreyasmun...@rediffmail.com>
To: jamb...@uwosh.edu
Cc: sanskrit@cs.utah.edu
Sent: Sat, November 7, 2009 1:18:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Sanskrit] Jayati or Jayate
Respected Shri Jambunath-ji Sir,
Thank you very much for your reply. I am happy because you
have actually reproduced the line printed in Devanaagari: ????????????? ?.?.?
??????? ???? ??????? ?????? ????? ????? ???????
People with whom I had discssed this verb, did say that they believed 'jayate'
is of the vedic origin but no one could show it to me in print. The editions
we, all said 'jayati'.
The two editions of the ????????????? which I have seen are some ten years
apart(between 1950 and 1960)and were both published by Geeta Press Gorakhpur
and they both say 'jayati'.
Last year I had spoken to Geeta Press people on phone from Mumbai but they did
not come back; I had then sent an email, followed by a reminder after some two
months but as it has happened, I have not received their response.
Would you, therefore, kindly favour me with the edition year and who the
publisher is from where you have extracted the line ??????? ???? ??????? ??????
????? ????? ???????
Sorry for the trouble I am giving you.
Regards...Shreyas
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:25:50 +0530 wrote
>Dear sri Munshi,It occurs in mudakopanihad.munDakopaniShad.h 3.1.6
satyameva jayate nAnR^itam.h satyena
panthA vivato devayAnaH ????????????? ?.?.?
??????? ???? ??????? ??????
????? ????? ??????? Regards,?????????On Nov 6, 2009, at 9:11 AM, Shreyas P.
Munshi wrote:Shri Jambunath-ji and Shri Naresh Cuntoorji Could you help out
with the Veda referenc where jayate is used and oblige...Shreyas On Fri, 06
Nov 2009 03:00:18 +0530 wrote >> Dear members, > > Sri Naresh cuntoor is
correct. "Satyameva jayate" is allowed because > it > occurs in veda. I
understand that sri panini when such a thing > occurs, says" > iti chandasi"
and allows the usage. > > Regards, > Jambunathan
_______________________________________________ To UNSUBSCRIBE or customize
your subscription or topics of interest, visit
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/mailman/options/sanskrit and follow instructions.
____________________________ Shreyas Munshi shreyasmun...@rediffmail.com C202,
Mandar Apartments, 120 Ft D P Road, Seven Bungalows, Versova, Mumbai 400 061
Tel Res: (22) 26364290 Mob: 981 981 8197
____________________________
Shreyas Munshi
shreyasmun...@rediffmail.com
C202, Mandar Apartments, 120 Ft D P Road,
Seven Bungalows, Versova, Mumbai 400 061
Tel Res: (22) 26364290 Mob: 981 981 8197
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/pipermail/sanskrit/attachments/20091107/8c39511f/attachment-0002.html
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 11:27:07 -0800 (PST)
From: Vidya R <imarch...@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Sanskrit] Jayati or Jayate
To: Sanskrit Mailing List <sanskrit@cs.utah.edu>, jamb...@uwosh.edu
Cc: sanskrit@cs.utah.edu
Message-ID: <205489.79174...@web36706.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
namaste!
In Samata Books' 'Sri shaankaragrathaavaliH - upaniShadbhAShyANi' (Volume 8,
Shankara's complete works - Commentaries on the Upanishads), the verse is
provided as:
??????? ???? ???????
?????? ????? ????? ??????? ?
????????????????? ???????????
???? ?????????? ????? ??????? ? ?.?.? ?
??????? -> ?????????
???? -> ????
??????? -> ????????????????
satyameva jayate nAnRutam
satyena panthA vitato devayAnaH |
yenAkramantyRuShayo hyAptakAmA
yatra tatsatyasya paramam nidhAnam || 3.1.6 ||
satyameva -> satyavAneva
jayate -> jayati
nAnRutam -> nAnRutavAdItyarthaH
vidyA
________________________________
From: Shreyas P. Munshi <shreyasmun...@rediffmail.com>
To: jamb...@uwosh.edu
Cc: sanskrit@cs.utah.edu
Sent: Sat, November 7, 2009 1:18:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Sanskrit] Jayati or Jayate
Respected Shri Jambunath-ji Sir,
Thank you very much for your reply. I am happy because you
have actually reproduced the line printed in Devanaagari: ????????????? ?.?.?
??????? ???? ??????? ?????? ????? ????? ???????
People with whom I had discssed this verb, did say that they believed 'jayate'
is of the vedic origin but no one could show it to me in print. The editions
we, all said 'jayati'.
The two editions of the ????????????? which I have seen are some ten years
apart(between 1950 and 1960)and were both published by Geeta Press Gorakhpur
and they both say 'jayati'.
Last year I had spoken to Geeta Press people on phone from Mumbai but they did
not come back; I had then sent an email, followed by a reminder after some two
months but as it has happened, I have not received their response.
Would you, therefore, kindly favour me with the edition year and who the
publisher is from where you have extracted the line ??????? ???? ??????? ??????
????? ????? ???????
Sorry for the trouble I am giving you.
Regards...Shreyas
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:25:50 +0530 wrote
>Dear sri Munshi,It occurs in mudakopanihad.munDakopaniShad.h 3.1.6
satyameva jayate nAnR^itam.h satyena
panthA vivato devayAnaH ????????????? ?.?.?
??????? ???? ??????? ??????
????? ????? ??????? Regards,?????????On Nov 6, 2009, at 9:11 AM, Shreyas P.
Munshi wrote:Shri Jambunath-ji and Shri Naresh Cuntoorji Could you help out
with the Veda referenc where jayate is used and oblige...Shreyas On Fri, 06
Nov 2009 03:00:18 +0530 wrote >> Dear members, > > Sri Naresh cuntoor is
correct. "Satyameva jayate" is allowed because > it > occurs in veda. I
understand that sri panini when such a thing > occurs, says" > iti chandasi"
and allows the usage. > > Regards, > Jambunathan
_______________________________________________ To UNSUBSCRIBE or customize
your subscription or topics of interest, visit
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/mailman/options/sanskrit and follow instructions.
____________________________ Shreyas Munshi shreyasmun...@rediffmail.com C202,
Mandar Apartments, 120 Ft D P Road, Seven Bungalows, Versova, Mumbai 400 061
Tel Res: (22) 26364290 Mob: 981 981 8197
____________________________
Shreyas Munshi
shreyasmun...@rediffmail.com
C202, Mandar Apartments, 120 Ft D P Road,
Seven Bungalows, Versova, Mumbai 400 061
Tel Res: (22) 26364290 Mob: 981 981 8197
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/pipermail/sanskrit/attachments/20091107/8c39511f/attachment-0003.html
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 09:25:42 +0530 (IST)
From: "P.K.Ramakrishnan" <peeka...@yahoo.com>
Subject: [Sanskrit] mayaaptam raamatvam
To: sanskrit digest <sanskrit@cs.utah.edu>
Message-ID: <974337.60359...@web95312.mail.in2.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
???????? ??????? ???-?????????????????
??? ?? ?????? ??????????????????????? /
?????? ????????????????????? ????
??????? ??????? ????????? ?????????? //
Sri HNBhat has almost cracked the riddle.
Here is my version.
I became like Rama like these.
janasthaana means a town.Also the area of Dandaka where Rama wandered.
I wandered in towns because of my blurred intellect to get the mirage of gold.
Rama also had a blurred intellect to get the golden deer.
I was saying in every step with tears ?give?. Rama also was similarly crying
in every step ?vaidehii? with tears in his eyes.
I met enough of unworthy persons.
Rama sent arrows in the row of faces of the lord of Lanka i.e.Ravana.
But I did not get kushala and vasutaa - happiness and wealth - unlike Rama who
got Sita.(Kusha-lava-sutaa).
The words having two meanings here are these.
1. janasthaana meaning town and the area of Dandakaranya.
2. kanaka mrigathrishnaa and kanakamriga thrishnaa
3. vai dehi and vaidehi.
4. kritaalam kaabhartuH and kritaa lamkaabhartuH
5. paripaaTiishu ghaTanaa and paripaaTi ishughatanaa
6. kushalavasutaa(meaning sita) and kusala vasutaa
Finally
???? ??????? ???????? ??? ??????? ??????:
-----------------------------------
P.K. Ramakrishnan
http://peekayar.blogspot.com
The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage.
http://in.yahoo.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/pipermail/sanskrit/attachments/20091108/cb331b06/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: 8 Nov 2009 07:32:58 -0000
From: "Shreyas P. Munshi" <shreyasmun...@rediffmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Sanskrit] Jayati or Jayate
To: <imarch...@yahoo.com>
Cc: jamb...@uwosh.edu, sanskrit@cs.utah.edu
Message-ID:
<1257621900.s.18813.12994.f5mail-237-217.rediffmail.com.1257665578.38...@webmail.rediffmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Respected Vidya-ji,
Thank you very much for your today's mail which reads as follows:
Quote
(In Samata Books' 'Sri shaankaragrathaavaliH - upaniShadbhAShyANi'; Volume 8,
Shankara's complete works - Commentaries on the Upanishads), the verse is
provided as:
??????? ???? ???????
?????? ????? ????? ??????? ?
????????????????? ???????????
???? ?????????? ????? ??????? ? ?.?.? ?
Unquote
As a favour, will you kindly advise the date of publication of the book you
have quoted.
Regards...Shreyas
On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:55:00 +0530 wrote
>namaste!In Samata Books' 'Sri shaankaragrathaavaliH - upaniShadbhAShyANi'
>(Volume 8, Shankara's complete works - Commentaries on the Upanishads), the
>verse is provided as:??????? ???? ??????? ?????? ????? ????? ???????
>?????????????????? ??????????? ???? ?????????? ????? ??????? ? ?.?.? ????????
>-> ????????????? -> ??????????? ->
????????????????satyameva jayate nAnRutam satyena panthA vitato devayAnaH
|yenAkramantyRuShayo hyAptakAmA yatra tatsatyasya paramam nidhAnam || 3.1.6
||satyameva -> satyavAnevajayate -> jayatinAnRutam ->
nAnRutavAdItyarthaHvidyAFrom: Shreyas P. Munshi To: jamb...@uwosh.educc:
sansk...@cs.utah.edusent:
Sat, November 7, 2009 1:18:09 PMSubject: Re: [Sanskrit] Jayati or Jayate
Respected Shri Jambunath-ji Sir,
Thank you very much for your reply. I am happy because you
have actually reproduced the line printed in Devanaagari: ????????????? ?.?.?
??????? ???? ??????? ?????? ????? ????? ???????
People with whom I had discssed this verb, did say that they believed 'jayate'
is of the vedic origin but no one could show it to me in print. The editions
we, all said 'jayati'.
The two editions of the ????????????? which I have seen are some ten years
apart(between 1950 and 1960)and were both published by Geeta Press Gorakhpur
and they both say 'jayati'.
Last year I had spoken to Geeta Press people on phone from Mumbai but they did
not come back; I had then sent an email, followed by a reminder after some two
months but as it has happened, I have not received their response.
Would you, therefore, kindly favour me with the edition year and who the
publisher is from where you have extracted the line ??????? ???? ??????? ??????
????? ????? ???????
Sorry for the trouble I am giving you.
Regards...Shreyas
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:25:50 +0530 wrote
>Dear sri Munshi,It occurs in mudakopanihad.munDakopaniShad.h 3.1.6
satyameva jayate nAnR^itam.h satyena
panthA vivato devayAnaH ????????????? ?.?.?
??????? ???? ??????? ??????
????? ????? ??????? Regards,?????????On Nov 6, 2009, at 9:11 AM, Shreyas P.
Munshi wrote:Shri Jambunath-ji and Shri Naresh Cuntoorji Could you help out
with the Veda referenc where jayate is used and oblige...Shreyas On Fri, 06
Nov 2009 03:00:18 +0530 wrote >> Dear members, > > Sri Naresh cuntoor is
correct. "Satyameva jayate" is allowed because > it > occurs in veda. I
understand that sri panini when such a thing > occurs, says" > iti chandasi"
and allows the usage. > > Regards, > Jambunathan
_______________________________________________ To UNSUBSCRIBE or customize
your subscription or topics of interest, visit
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/mailman/options/sanskrit and follow instructions.
____________________________ Shreyas Munshi shreyasmun...@rediffmail.com C202,
Mandar
Apartments, 120 Ft D P Road, Seven Bungalows, Versova, Mumbai 400 061 Tel Res:
(22) 26364290 Mob: 981 981 8197
____________________________
Shreyas Munshi
shreyasmun...@rediffmail.com
C202, Mandar Apartments, 120 Ft D P Road,
Seven Bungalows, Versova, Mumbai 400 061
Tel Res: (22) 26364290 Mob: 981 981 8197
_______________________________________________
To UNSUBSCRIBE or customize your subscription or topics of interest, visit
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/mailman/options/sanskrit
and follow instructions.
____________________________
Shreyas Munshi
shreyasmun...@rediffmail.com
C202, Mandar Apartments, 120 Ft D P Road,
Seven Bungalows, Versova, Mumbai 400 061
Tel Res: (22) 26364290 Mob: 981 981 8197
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/pipermail/sanskrit/attachments/20091108/bde98297/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:45:45 +0530
From: Anand <synet...@mtnl.net.in>
Subject: [Sanskrit] Satyameva Jayate
To: sanskrit@cs.utah.edu
Message-ID: <000601ca609f$7e159290$0201a...@anand>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1;
reply-type=original
Dear Friends ,
Does the word Satya mean truth here or something more like permanent ? What
is the Nirukta of Satya ?
If you take it to mean permanent , then a worldly advise is evident as that
the one which is more permanent prevails .
Thanks in advance.
Regards ,
Anand
A. K. Ghurye
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:54:05 +0900
From: Phillip Ernest <phillip.ern...@utoronto.ca>
Subject: Re: [Sanskrit] sanskrit Digest, Vol 55, Issue 2 jayate or
jayati?
To: sanskrit@cs.utah.edu
Message-ID: <20091109225405.f4qqwqes4c008...@webmail.utoronto.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes";
format="flowed"
Quoting Chandra Sekhar <shekhar4sansk...@gmail.com>:
> i have seen some instances where P is used as A.
There are a lot of verbs that can go either way in the Mahabharata,
according to metrical need, but I'm sure the option is not there for
just any verbs, even though I could not tell you which ones show this
variation.
Phillip
back in Pune
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: 9 Nov 2009 18:09:10 -0000
From: "Shreyas P. Munshi" <shreyasmun...@rediffmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Sanskrit] FW: satyameva .....
To: <divyastra2002...@hotmail.com>
Cc: sanskrit@cs.utah.edu
Message-ID:
<1257775204.s.5525.9144.f5mail-147-112.rediffmail.com.1257790150.25...@webmail.rediffmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Phillip Sir,
Thanks for your information via:
Quote
AnandatIrtha explains the word satyam in the muNDakopanishhad mantra in
question as a name of Lord vishhNu. His reading also for the verb is jayati:
> ??????? ???? ?????? ?????? ????? ????? ???????
> Comment:
> ????? ?? ?????? ??????? ???????????? ???????????? ?
> ?????? ???????????????????? ????????????
Unquote
But Philip Sir,I am now confused once again. Which is correct: jayati or
jayate? Is there a linguistic innovation involved?
Regards...Shreyas
PS: I am trying to collect instances of linguistic innovations in Sanskrit.
jayati/jayate attracted my attention from that angle and hence I raised the
query. Yesterday Vidya-ji found jayate published in a 1910 edition, although I
request her (by this mail) and all you scholars to favour me with instance or
instances of jayate used at places other than Mundakopnishad 3.1.6. I have not
found any other instance.
I have some questions fo certain usages in BhagwadGeeta as well but will deal
with them separately. Regards to all..Shreyas
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:30:04 +0530 wrote
>
>
>
.ExternalClass .ecxhmmessage P
{padding:0px;}
.ExternalClass body.ecxhmmessage
{font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana;}
Sir,
> AnandatIrtha explains the word satyam in the muNDakopanishhad mantra in
> question as a name of Lord vishhNu. His reading also for the verb is jayati:
> ??????? ???? ?????? ?????? ????? ????? ???????
> Comment:
> ????? ?? ?????? ??????? ???????????? ???????????? ?
> ?????? ???????????????????? ????????????
>
>
Bing brings you maps, menus, and reviews organized in one place. Try it now.
>
>Windows 7: Unclutter your desktop. Learn more.
____________________________
Shreyas Munshi
shreyasmun...@rediffmail.com
C202, Mandar Apartments, 120 Ft D P Road,
Seven Bungalows, Versova, Mumbai 400 061
Tel Res: (22) 26364290 Mob: 981 981 8197
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/pipermail/sanskrit/attachments/20091109/a74072f4/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:40:03 -0500
From: Phillip Hill <divyastra2002...@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Sanskrit] FW: satyameva .....
To: <sanskrit@cs.utah.edu>
Message-ID: <snt110-w36454078e2ab997c9161aed9...@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Priya Shreyas,
I would say first, that Shankara and Madhva have a
different reading for the upanishhad mantra in question. This is certainly not
the only example of differing texts between these two Acharyas. Second, I
believe we have to allow anomalous word forms to occur at several strata of
Sanskrit writings, from the Vedic to the Medieval Kavyas. Vasu's Siddhanta -
Kaumudi, vol. 2, p.157 has this to say about ji - dhAtu:
?? ??? ???? ?????????? ?????? ?????? ? ?? ???????????????? ?
??????????? ? ????
?? ??? ' to surpass, excel. ' This root ends in a vowel, and
appropriately ought to been classed with vowel - ending roots, and not here
among consonant ending roots. jaya means to get excellence. This is
Intransitive. The root ?? ' tp obtain victory ' is Transitive. Present form
???? ?
That is all I can say
on the issue. bhavadIya,
Bryan Hill
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 18:09:10 +0000
To: divyastra2002...@hotmail.com
From: shreyasmun...@rediffmail.com
CC: sanskrit@cs.utah.edu
Subject: Re: [Sanskrit] FW: satyameva .....
Phillip Sir,
Thanks for your information via:
Quote
AnandatIrtha explains the word satyam in the muNDakopanishhad mantra in
question as a name of Lord vishhNu. His reading also for the verb is jayati:
> ??????? ???? ?????? ?????? ????? ????? ???????
> Comment:
> ????? ?? ?????? ??????? ???????????? ???????????? ?
> ?????? ???????????????????? ????????????
Unquote
But Philip Sir,I am now confused once again. Which is correct: jayati or
jayate? Is there a linguistic innovation involved?
Regards...Shreyas
PS: I am trying to collect instances of linguistic innovations in Sanskrit.
jayati/jayate attracted my attention from that angle and hence I raised the
query. Yesterday Vidya-ji found jayate published in a 1910 edition, although I
request her (by this mail) and all you scholars to favour me with instance or
instances of jayate used at places other than Mundakopnishad 3.1.6. I have not
found any other instance.
I have some questions fo certain usages in BhagwadGeeta as well but will deal
with them separately. Regards to all..Shreyas
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:30:04 +0530 wrote
>
>
>
.ExternalClass .ecxhmmessage P
{padding:0px;}
.ExternalClass body.ecxhmmessage
{font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana;}
Sir,
> AnandatIrtha explains the word satyam in the muNDakopanishhad mantra in
> question as a name of Lord vishhNu. His reading also for the verb is jayati:
> ??????? ???? ?????? ?????? ????? ????? ???????
> Comment:
> ????? ?? ?????? ??????? ???????????? ???????????? ?
> ?????? ???????????????????? ????????????
>
>
Bing brings you maps, menus, and reviews organized in one place. Try it now.
>
>Windows 7: Unclutter your desktop. Learn more.
____________________________
Shreyas Munshi
shreyasmun...@rediffmail.com
C202, Mandar Apartments, 120 Ft D P Road,
Seven Bungalows, Versova, Mumbai 400 061
Tel Res: (22) 26364290 Mob: 981 981 8197
_________________________________________________________________
Bing brings you maps, menus, and reviews organized in one place.
http://www.bing.com/search?q=restaurants&form=MFESRP&publ=WLHMTAG&crea=TEXT_MFESRP_Local_MapsMenu_Resturants_1x1
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/pipermail/sanskrit/attachments/20091109/0bcf9297/attachment.html
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
To UNSUBSCRIBE or customize your subscription and email delivery, visit
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/mailman/options/sanskrit
and follow instructions.
End of sanskrit Digest, Vol 55, Issue 5
***************************************
