Hugo Gayosso [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Rudy Gevaert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for your input :), somebody else want to give a third
opininion?
[...]
I would suggest to send it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rudy, if I were you, I would suggest user to submit with a more usual
license or
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 12:31:36PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
Rudy, if I were you, I would suggest user to submit with a more usual
license or to ask [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The user his program is under the GPL, but it uses a wordlist that
isn't under a GPL compatible license.
It takes time to get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rudy Gevaert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for your input :), somebody else want to give a third
opininion?
[...]
I would suggest to send it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greetings,
- --
Hugo Gayosso
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
Rudy Gevaert [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
A project that has been submitted uses a word list that is under the
following license. I think it is free software, but I would like to
have a second opininion. Also the project itself is released under
the GPL. Is this ok?
To me, there is problem
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 11:42:05AM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
To me, there is problem there.
This word-list is free software but GPL incompatible. The GPL does not
restrict financial return.
You can make money with GPLed software, not with this word-list.
Solution (IMHO):
- remove
