Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you already know by which mean it would be preferable to restrict
> [write] access [to a git repository] ?
Hi Sylvain,
Thanks for working on this.
Since I expect the list of people with write access to be very small,
simply listing their user names
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 10:18:22AM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 08:39:09AM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> >> Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Meanwhile I manually replaced refs/heads/master to
> >> > e24ce7c58d
Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 08:39:09AM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Meanwhile I manually replaced refs/heads/master to
>> > e24ce7c58d2355b720b523f0bde6e0d2c47cbe68 (you just mentioned it) and I
>> > also rep
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 08:39:09AM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Meanwhile I manually replaced refs/heads/master to
> > e24ce7c58d2355b720b523f0bde6e0d2c47cbe68 (you just mentioned it) and I
> > also repacked the repository to a 45MB pack file :)
>
> T
Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Meanwhile I manually replaced refs/heads/master to
> e24ce7c58d2355b720b523f0bde6e0d2c47cbe68 (you just mentioned it) and I
> also repacked the repository to a 45MB pack file :)
Thanks!
Looks good. Does anyone else have write (push) access to that tree
Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
>> I'm pushing coreutils now (127k objects).
>> Will take a look at the result this evening.
>
> Woah - 1.1GB!
Yep. Back before git-cvsimport did an auto-repack/prune,
it was really bad.
> I guess we need to seriously consider auto-packing :)
Yes :
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 06:38:12PM +0100, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 06:18:51PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> > Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I installed gitweb, to browse the repositories:
> > > http://cvs.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/
> >
> > Sylvain,
> >
> > I firs
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 06:18:51PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I installed gitweb, to browse the repositories:
> > http://cvs.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/
>
> Sylvain,
>
> I first pushed your little example (dir containing only README),
> and that worked. Th
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 05:52:05PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> >> I see that it uses a nifty naming convention:
> >> /git/project.git
> >> /git/project/other_repos.git
>
> Sounds like we'll be able to use shorter URLs.
> That'd be good.
>
> It'd
Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I installed gitweb, to browse the repositories:
> http://cvs.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/
Sylvain,
I first pushed your little example (dir containing only README),
and that worked. Then I went to my "master" coreutils git tree
and pushed it. (I had to use --for
Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
>> I see that it uses a nifty naming convention:
>> /git/project.git
>> /git/project/other_repos.git
Sounds like we'll be able to use shorter URLs.
That'd be good.
It'd be nice if the host name does not start with "cvs.".
How about this?
git
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 02:08:49AM +0100, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 05:02:15PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> > Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> rsync write access is good, at least initially.
> > >> Unless there's some other way for me to transfer the original
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 05:02:15PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> rsync write access is good, at least initially.
> >> Unless there's some other way for me to transfer the original
> >> .git repository, and potentially, to overwrite it with a new
> >> o
Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> rsync write access is good, at least initially.
>> Unless there's some other way for me to transfer the original
>> .git repository, and potentially, to overwrite it with a new
>> one as I experiment and (likely, as I learn) want to start fresh.
>
> Aft
14 matches
Mail list logo
