[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> I'm sorry but I bring along previous discussion baggage. Let me
> explain.
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 04:30:18PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> HTTP is one unencrypted
> protocol. But so is anonymous FTP access. And so on with every other
> unencrypted protocol such as cvs pserver. Every argument that HTTP
> must be blocked is also the exact same argument that all other
>
Richard Stallman wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > And also for example would the FSF shutdown anonymous ftp access for
> > ftp.gnu.org too? Anonymous ftp, the anonymous cvs pserver, git
> > server, others, all will be on the chopping block. I fear the pursuit
> > of perfect will injure those not
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> And also for example would the FSF shutdown anonymous ftp access for
>
Richard Stallman wrote:
> Some people are arguing that we should turn off HTTP on Savannah,
> so it should support ONLY HTTPS. I included some of what
> they said.
>
> That seems like a radical demand, and I am skeptical. What do you
> think about the issue? Should we actually make Savannah
Some people are arguing that we should turn off HTTP on Savannah,
so it should support ONLY HTTPS. I included some of what
they said.
That seems like a radical demand, and I am skeptical. What do you
think about the issue? Should we actually make Savannah reject HTTP
connections outright?
