Update of sr #107671 (project administration):
Category:None = Savannah website
Status:None = Done
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
Follow-up Comment #25, sr #107671 (project administration):
What I did yesterday included an updated version of that patch.
___
Reply to this item at:
http://savannah.gnu.org/support/?107671
Follow-up Comment #24, sr #107671 (project administration):
I think those are great improvements. Thanks for doing the work. (I wonder
what the Sav! (sav.git) repository is.)
So, going back a step, how about your patch switching things to point to
/p/administration now?
Thanks,
k
Follow-up Comment #20, sr #107671 (project administration):
how about changing the links to /p/administration?
Then /p/administration should clearly say how to clone
administration/savane.git.
Since the natural way to get current source code for a Savannah group is to
follow the links under
Follow-up Comment #21, sr #107671 (project administration):
Then /p/administration should clearly say how to clone
administration/savane.git.
I totally agree (regardless of anything else).
And for every package with multiple git repositories, it should show all the
available repositories.
Follow-up Comment #18, sr #107671 (project administration):
Wouldn't it be better to just replace the links to
.../projects/savane-cleanup with .../projects/savane,
https://savannah.nongnu.org/p/savane is a rewrite, it is not
used on Savannah yet; https://gna.org/p/savane is not what
Savannah
Follow-up Comment #19, sr #107671 (project administration):
To be precise, there are at least two repositories,
administration.git and administration/savane.git
Oh! It finally begins to become clear. And how is one supposed to know that,
when https://savannah.gnu.org/git/?group=administration
Follow-up Comment #17, sr #107671 (project administration):
Ineiev: Wouldn't it be better to just replace the links to
.../projects/savane-cleanup with .../projects/savane, instead of specifically
the git repository? More information, and there's no reason to suppose git
will be the last or only
Follow-up Comment #16, sr #107671 (project administration):
re the git push: what is the error you got?
I must apologize; in fact it works. I think I just was used to look at
project's pages and find the instructions for CVS, and I didn't realized that
it may be more complicated for Git.
To be
Follow-up Comment #14, sr #107671 (project administration):
hi ineiev,
yes, so (under my theory) we would change the savannah source pointer (you
mean just in the project?), not savane-cleanup. this wouldn't be migrating
to anything new, just recognizing reality. does it make sense?
re the
Follow-up Comment #15, sr #107671 (project administration):
To be clear, the currently we're using
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/administration/savane.git/ as the
authoritative sources for savannah.
Certain features, like comments in news articles, are disabled in that
repository.
The
Follow-up Comment #12, sr #107671 (project administration):
i have not investigated the differences between the savane and savane-cleanup
repos, but i have the impression they are substantial. as part of Sylvain's
historical effort to merge gna and savannah sources, long since abandoned on
both
Follow-up Comment #13, sr #107671 (project administration):
Will anything bad come of pushing that?
There are two problems: first, few people know how to push it (I don't, what I
tried didn't work), second, Savannah points to savane-cleanup as her source
code.
therefore there's no point in
Follow-up Comment #8, sr #107671 (project administration):
Is this still an issue? Can we close this?
___
Reply to this item at:
http://savannah.gnu.org/support/?107671
___
Message sent
Follow-up Comment #9, sr #107671 (project administration):
the original request is done, thanks to Ineiev.
(https://savannah.gnu.org/people/ now allows selecting of multiple categories,
etc.)
I left it open because of Ineiev's comment that:
git push still doesn't work
[on frontend.sv.gnu.org,
Follow-up Comment #10, sr #107671 (project administration):
git push still doesn't work
I meant that I couldn't push the changes to origin in
/usr/src/savane on frontend.gnu.org.
BTW, https://savannah.gnu.org says that its Source Code is [0],
whereas the code in /usr/src/savane/ on
Follow-up Comment #11, sr #107671 (project administration):
To further clarify it: in June I actually committed
index.txt in /etc/savane/content/gnu-content/people,
it is a working copy of web pages of the `administration'
group.
___
Reply
Follow-up Comment #5, sr #107671 (project administration):
Next revision is online.
...if category name and project type were a link that brings up the jobs
that are listed
Done.
Any category which just brings up all jobs in the selected project types
Done (I think --- it shows all jobs
Follow-up Comment #6, sr #107671 (project administration):
looks just fine to me now, except there is a trivial typo: missing period
after visit the support manager. Which text actually should be a link (to
https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?group=administration I guess).
Can you fix that and
Follow-up Comment #7, sr #107671 (project administration):
I've replaced it with the new version; I also git committed the changes on
frontend.sv.gnu.org (git push still doesn't work there).
___
Reply to this item at:
Follow-up Comment #3, sr #107671 (project administration):
I've just written a draft, https://savannah.gnu.org/people/1index.php.
___
Reply to this item at:
http://savannah.gnu.org/support/?107671
Follow-up Comment #4, sr #107671 (project administration):
Hi Ineiev - wow, great. It's an excellent improvement. Here are the things
that come to mind:
- it would be convenient if category name and project type were a link that
brings up the jobs that are listed (the links that are on the
Follow-up Comment #2, sr #107671 (project administration):
Yes, this functionality would be need to be implemented via a code change.
I'll add that to my to-do list.
___
Reply to this item at:
http://savannah.gnu.org/support/?107671
URL:
http://savannah.gnu.org/support/?107671
Summary: Viewing Job list of multiple project types.
Project: Savannah Administration
Submitted by: shailesh_ghadge
Submitted on: Sun 17 Apr 2011 11:03:52 AM GMT
Category: None
Follow-up Comment #1, sr #107671 (project administration):
Shailesh, sorry for the delay ... this was still on my list to ask Michael
about. As for your direct question here, I think the answer is no; at least,
I've never heard of any such aggregation query.
Michael, what we want to do is have
25 matches
Mail list logo
