On 9/14/12 1:35 AM, Pavel Kharitonov via RT wrote:
On 09/11/2012 08:46 AM, Ineiev wrote:
I think there may be another possibility: can you confirm that the new.py
call is *(successfully) done* after the cvs commit has successfully
completed?
For instance, this is what CVS has just said to
On 9/14/12 1:35 AM, Pavel Kharitonov via RT wrote:
On 09/11/2012 08:46 AM, Ineiev wrote:
I think there may be another possibility: can you confirm that the new.py
call is *(successfully) done* after the cvs commit has successfully
completed?
For instance, this is what CVS has just said to