Hi Karl,
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 02:01:07PM -0600, Karl Berry wrote:
Looking at http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?8900, I find myself wondering
about hosting typical php projects on savannah since the php license is
regrettably incompatible with the GPL. This particular project says
it's
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 01:27:58PM -0600, Karl Berry wrote:
For example, what would be the decision on runs on version 6 of Java?
The general criteria is the same as always: it needs to run using only
free software.
In practice, what that means for Java is that it should run (and
Hi Sebastian,
Given your involvement in reviewing project submissions we added you
to the 'administration' group. Welcome :)
Incidentally you now can assign tasks to you in the tracker.
--
Sylvain
Sylvain Beucler wrote:
http://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/PhpIssues
The main issue was not the PHP license itself, it was the fact PEAR
was using it for some of their own independant PHP libraries.
So, the incompatibility with the GPL is just one of the problems
(which alone is enough for
beuc I don't understand why you make a distinction between command
line applications and web-based applications.
I was thinking that the license of a project written in PHP had to be
compatible with PHPL.
http://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/PhpIssues
Ah. The crucial thing I was
Category: Project Approval = Approved Projects to be Reviewed
Sebastian --
I think it's better to change the status to need admin than to change
the category. I think the above category is for projects which need to
be reviewed after approval? And those should be left open, I guess.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Karl Berry k...@freefriends.org wrote:
Category: Project Approval = Approved Projects to be Reviewed
Sebastian --
I think it's better to change the status to need admin than to change
the category. I think the above category is for projects which need
