Hi,
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 01:49:28PM +0100, Joerg Kohne wrote:
Hi Sylvain,
after you've committedthe German language files I sentyou via email,
I'vecommitted, too (because of extended ASCII characters have been
replaced by ???). Unfortunately, the changes are stillnot visible
in the demo
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 06:00:37PM +, Karl Berry wrote:
Is there a direct url for users to view all jobs associated with a
package? Poking around at https://savannah.gnu.org/people/ I didn't see
it, yet it seems like it would be a very useful thing to link to from
package web pages,
Hi,
I just upgraded sv.gnu.org (the frontend VM) to Debian Squeeze 6.0.
I see that Zope2 is not supported anymore, and ZWiki (which runs the
http://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/ wiki) depends on it.
I think it's a good opportunity to convert the maintenance wiki to a
decentralized wiki, which
Hi Sylvain,
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Sylvain Beucler b...@gnu.org wrote:
I think it's a good opportunity to convert the maintenance wiki to a
decentralized wiki, which would better fit our philosophy.
Questions:
- what wiki to use?
suggestion: ikiwiki
- how to convert
Apparently there isn't a page that filters jobs per-project.
Well, shouldn't there be? The point of having a jobs feature is to find
volunteers. If a package can't put a useful link on its home page for
its open jobs, it seems to me the likelihood of finding volunteers is
greatly reduced.
- what wiki to use?
suggestion: ikiwiki
Sounds good to me.
- how to convert
suggestion: raw export+import (aka history is lost)
Fine with me.
Thanks,
k
we like to suggest GPLv3 *or later*
To be sure we're all on the same page about this: the GPLv3 part is a
suggestion, could be GPLv2. But the or later part is not a
suggestion, it's a requirement.
Put another way, SV-hosted projects should never be GPLvN-only, always
GPLvN-or-later (or
Hi Karl,
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Karl Berry k...@freefriends.org wrote:
we like to suggest GPLv3 *or later*
To be sure we're all on the same page about this: the GPLv3 part is a
suggestion, could be GPLv2. But the or later part is not a
suggestion, it's a requirement.
Hmmm,
