Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Reviewing of project: Named Constant Generator (GenNC)

2013-08-16 Thread Ineiev
On 08/16/2013 10:23 PM, Karl Berry wrote: ineiev> I wonder whether it is really crucial for files like > README, AUTHORS, THANKS, ABOUT-NLS to carry copyright notices. They are files like any others that will need to be modified as time goes by. I personally see no reason why they shou

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Reviewing of project: Named Constant Generator (GenNC)

2013-08-16 Thread Karl Berry
ineiev> I wonder whether it is really crucial for files like > README, AUTHORS, THANKS, ABOUT-NLS to carry copyright notices. They are files like any others that will need to be modified as time goes by. I personally see no reason why they should be an exception to needing a license, pre

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Reviewing of project: Named Constant Generator (GenNC)

2013-08-16 Thread Joan Lledó
Well, for AUTHORS, THANKS, etc... I agree. But if a README file contains a user manual, I think it should be licensed. Because the fact is that if a file is not licensed, it has a closed copyright by default. And since adding a license header is so fast and easy, why not add it? Al 16/08/13 13

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Reviewing of project: Named Constant Generator (GenNC)

2013-08-16 Thread Ineiev
On 08/15/2013 08:19 PM, Joan Lledó wrote: README.txt I wonder whether it is really crucial for files like README, AUTHORS, THANKS, ABOUT-NLS to carry copyright notices.

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Reviewing of project: Named Constant Generator (GenNC)

2013-08-16 Thread Joan Lledó
Hi, yes, I've wrote that because that's what Rudra wrote to me, but you're right, that also confused me when I read it. I'll write my answer in the task including your suggestions. Thank you! Al 16/08/13 01:43, En/na Aljosha Papsch ha escrit: Am Donnerstag, den 15.08.2013, 18:19 +0200 schrie