On 08/16/2013 10:23 PM, Karl Berry wrote:
ineiev> I wonder whether it is really crucial for files like
> README, AUTHORS, THANKS, ABOUT-NLS to carry copyright notices.
They are files like any others that will need to be modified as time
goes by. I personally see no reason why they shou
ineiev> I wonder whether it is really crucial for files like
> README, AUTHORS, THANKS, ABOUT-NLS to carry copyright notices.
They are files like any others that will need to be modified as time
goes by. I personally see no reason why they should be an exception to
needing a license, pre
Well, for AUTHORS, THANKS, etc... I agree. But if a README file contains
a user manual, I think it should be licensed. Because the fact is that
if a file is not licensed, it has a closed copyright by default. And
since adding a license header is so fast and easy, why not add it?
Al 16/08/13 13
On 08/15/2013 08:19 PM, Joan Lledó wrote:
README.txt
I wonder whether it is really crucial for files like
README, AUTHORS, THANKS, ABOUT-NLS to carry copyright
notices.
Hi,
yes, I've wrote that because that's what Rudra wrote to me, but you're
right, that also confused me when I read it.
I'll write my answer in the task including your suggestions. Thank you!
Al 16/08/13 01:43, En/na Aljosha Papsch ha escrit:
Am Donnerstag, den 15.08.2013, 18:19 +0200 schrie