On 02/05/2016 01:50 PM, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>
> It is the most common free software license being used, it can't be
> much more common than that.
Do you have stats for that? I am (was) a Ruby developer and I think I
never came across a library licensed under the GPL.
Hello Assaf,
I won't address most points you made because I actually agree with some
of your factual considerations, so the only thing I will address is what
I perceive as a recurring theme (with which I disagree, but I respect
your point of view): "If it ain't broke, don't fix it".
On
On 02/05/2016 01:18 PM, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>
> It seems that http://notabug.org also accepts non-free programs, for
> example:
>
> https://notabug.org/nelis/hg-shopp-theme
>
> This has no license information what so ever. If this is in error or
> not, I don't know.
This should have not
Savane is old. The interface looks straight from the early 2000s at
best, it is cluttered, the default color scheme scares users away.
Not to mention the fact that on the homepage, there are just few "news"
and some are as old as 2011, which make the site look poorly maintained,
and most of the
CC'in the new Savannah mirrors
[ni...@acc.umu.se - Sun May 10 05:31:18 2015]:
URLs, Non-GNU / Savannah:
http://ftp.acc.umu.se/mirror/gnu.org/savannah/
rsync://ftp.acc.umu.se/mirror/gnu.org/savannah/
