Hi,
There are other projects on Savannah that contain the word Open in
them, granted some of those are derived from another project that has
the word open in its name but there are others that do not. Were those
mistakes?
In general, I expect so. Or perhaps they were
Hi Yavor,
I'm currently experimenting with Pootle [1] as part of my old Dink
Translation project [2].
[1] http://pootle.locamotion.org/
[2] http://dink-translation.beuc.net/pootle/
Is there any interest to install it at Savannah?
(or maybe another tool I don't know?)
--
Sylvain
The maintainer has dutifully resolved all reported issues
in a timely manner.
Therefore, I recommend his project for soon approval now.
https://savannah.gnu.org/task/?8890
(Except that there is a oversight with double manual files,
one of which missing the license. But this can be mentioned
Sylvain Beucler wrote:
Is there any interest to install it at Savannah?
For the time being -- no, at least as far as web-translators are
concerned. RMS promised a separate server for our stuff (mostly
because the FSF admins are always lagging, and this would require many
tweaks/interventions,
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Sylvain Beucler b...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi,
There are other projects on Savannah that contain the word Open in
them, granted some of those are derived from another project that has
the word open in its name but there are others that do not. Were those
I don't feel honest in turning down
a project just because of their name and the idea of open source when
previous projects were accepted. I could if an there was an
explanation.
I understand your reluctance, but the explanation is that the previous
acceptances are mistakes. The
