On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 06:11:08PM +0100, Nicodemo Alvaro wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:40:34 +0100
Sylvain Beucler b...@gnu.org wrote:
The checkboxes are intended to be a _fast_ thing to read, which people
cannot miss. If you make a checkbox I agree with the requirements,
pointing to a
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:07:56 +0100
Sylvain Beucler b...@gnu.org wrote:
I don't think a hacker can understand your suggestion unless he's
already familiar with the issue.
Anyway that's just one example taken from the full list.
I don't care how many examples there are. I am trying to fix it
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 03:35:31PM +0100, Nicodemo Alvaro wrote:
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:07:56 +0100
Sylvain Beucler b...@gnu.org wrote:
I don't think a hacker can understand your suggestion unless he's
already familiar with the issue.
Anyway that's just one example taken from the full
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 10:21 +0100, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
What I am hoping for is something that the reviewer can more easily
refer to. In order to fix it in my strategy, that page needs to be
precise, restructured, and simplified. So the document I sent was
intended to help fix it.
The
