Hi Karl,
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Karl Berry k...@freefriends.org wrote:
Re the legal entity question that was raised on
http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?10297.
On this task the developer did not use the generic project name, but
the names of two departments inside institutions.
URL:
http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?10311
Summary: switching from GNU Arch to Git
Project: Savannah Administration
Submitted by: oneingray
Submitted on: Wed 31 Mar 2010 10:06:39 PM NOVST
Should Start On: Wed 31 Mar 2010 12:00:00
Update of task #10311 (project administration):
Category: Approved Projects to be Reviewed = System
___
Reply to this item at:
http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?10311
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 04:49:48PM -0400, Ward Vandewege via RT wrote:
[beuc - Tue Mar 30 15:36:51 2010]:
Hi,
Yes, it should call new.py on project creation, then on commit.
vcs-noshell:/usr/local/share/perl/5.10.0/Savane/Cvs.pm
Do you have logs? Our logs do not show a new.py
Follow-up Comment #2, task #10311 (project administration):
Can I? The page mentions “Git activation in the
web front-end,” however, I only see the “Use GNU
Arch” option below “Source Code” for Rawtools.
(And there is indeed a GNU Arch repository for
Rawtools, which I intend to deprecate by
Follow-up Comment #3, task #10311 (project administration):
Yes you can! ;) It's in the admin options:
Main Select Features
from your project page.
___
Reply to this item at:
http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?10311
Follow-up Comment #4, task #10311 (project administration):
Indeed. Thanks.
___
Reply to this item at:
http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?10311
___
Message sent via/by Savannah
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:33:17PM +, Karl Berry wrote:
Re the legal entity question that was raised on
http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?10297.
According to Brett's reply to Sylvain's question on licens...@fsf.org
(in respond to Eric Raymond's submission), it is ok to use the generic
