On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 09:20:47AM -0700, John Sullivan wrote:
> On March 11, 2019 9:03:32 AM PDT, Ineiev wrote:
> >
> >I checked the records for as a datapoint. that account
> >has never been used in any trackers, and there was a period
> >of 6 years when essentially no group status for that
On March 11, 2019 9:03:32 AM PDT, Ineiev wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 09:14:09AM -0800, John Sullivan wrote:
>>
>> Both make sense to me. Retaining old inactive data is a security risk
>--
>> magnifies the impact of any database breach.
>
>I checked the records for as a datapoint. that
On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 09:14:09AM -0800, John Sullivan wrote:
>
> Both make sense to me. Retaining old inactive data is a security risk --
> magnifies the impact of any database breach.
I checked the records for as a datapoint. that account
has never been used in any trackers, and there was a