> In sum, this private playground is something webmasters want and need,
> and search engines should have no business indexing it. Is it possible?
robots.txt will not stop ill-behaved robots from indexing. Although
Google and Duck Duck Go, to the best of my knowledge, do respect it, it
Thérèse Godefroy writes:
> Hello,
>
> I was searching for an article with DuckDuckGo, and guess what appeared
> on top of the results...
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/www-commits/2023-05/msg00082.html
> and
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/www-commits/2023-05/msg00062.html !!
>
> I
ine...@gnu.org wrote:
> - Unfortunately nothing has been implemented to allow the group
> - administrator to do this from the web interface. Fortunately this
> - doesn't need to change very often. Please submit a
> - [support
>
Thérèse Godefroy wrote:
> I understand it wouldn't be practical to make this list private, but it
> could at least be off-limits for crawlers.
I am not a member of the www team so I just don't know the answer to
this question but why not? If the www team doesn't need the public
web archive then
Ineiev wrote:
> On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 04:40:01PM +, Ineiev wrote:
> > On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 02:28:30PM +0200, Alex Baranowski via Discussions
> > among Savannah Hackers, open subscription wrote:
> > >
> > > I tried to clone https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/which.git and set it up
> > >
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 07:52:41PM +0200, Thérèse Godefroy wrote:
> Le 12/05/2023 à 19:24, Alfred M. Szmidt a écrit :
> > Might be worth noting that www.gnu.org is mostly usable locally from
> > the CVS checkout as well, if one needs to look things over.
> >
>
> It would work if the checked out
Le 12/05/2023 à 19:24, Alfred M. Szmidt a écrit :
Might be worth noting that www.gnu.org is mostly usable locally from
the CVS checkout as well, if one needs to look things over.
It would work if the checked out files were complete HTML pages. Our
problem is that they are not. The banner,
That sounds reasonable to me. I would assume that if webmasters don't
have access to change robots.txt, it would just be the fsf tech team.
They do. It is in www.
I'm still sorta opposing this .. we have always been transparant.
That search engines "have no business" is as saying that
Might be worth noting that www.gnu.org is mostly usable locally from
the CVS checkout as well, if one needs to look things over.
So a patch to www-discuss@ or whatever for a unpublished article would
be sufficient in postponing any publishing. It would just be a matter
of applying the patch, and
Dora Scilipoti writes:
> Hi,
>
> the gnu/server/staging directory was created years ago because GNU
> webmasters expressed the wish to have a private space where they could
> play around, test and see how different styles would look in the
> website. Things like where to put the nav bar, which
Hi,
the gnu/server/staging directory was created years ago because GNU
webmasters expressed the wish to have a private space where they could
play around, test and see how different styles would look in the
website. Things like where to put the nav bar, which colors to use,
where to use h3s or
11 matches
Mail list logo
