Hello;
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 05:26:13PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > +if ($project->CanUse("homepage") && $project->CanUse("git")) {
>
> That's an insufficient combination. Many current projects already use
> git for their source code and many of them won't want to change their
> web page
drwxrws--- 6 root gnueval 253 Nov 9 11:34 /srv/svn/gnueval/db
FWIW, I have a vague recollection from my time as gnueval (~15-20 years
ago) that, as a super special case, we explicitly made the repository
private because it contained possibly-nonfree and/or private information
that
I don't have my old checkout any more, but wouldn't we use, e.g.,
svn+ssh://k...@svn.savannah.gnu.org/gnueval
to access?
(As shown on https://savannah.gnu.org/svn/?group=gnueval)
Sorry if that's what you're already saying ...
Karl Berry wrote:
>drwxrws--- 6 root gnueval 253 Nov 9 11:34 /srv/svn/gnueval/db
>
> FWIW, I have a vague recollection from my time as gnueval (~15-20 years
> ago) that, as a super special case, we explicitly made the repository
> private because it contained possibly-nonfree and/or
Karl Berry wrote:
>drwxrws--- 6 root gnueval 253 Nov 9 11:34 /srv/svn/gnueval/db
>
> FWIW, I have a vague recollection from my time as gnueval (~15-20 years
> ago) that, as a super special case, we explicitly made the repository
> private because it contained possibly-nonfree and/or
Karl Berry wrote:
> I don't have my old checkout any more, but wouldn't we use, e.g.,
> svn+ssh://k...@svn.savannah.gnu.org/gnueval
> to access?
> (As shown on https://savannah.gnu.org/svn/?group=gnueval)
>
> Sorry if that's what you're already saying ...
Yes. Ignoring the mystery of how this
On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 04:35:07PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> I have set permissions aback to the above. But now there is the
> question of how this previously worked.
I have a hypothesis. I may have changed the permissions when
I modified sv_groups to create repositories of private groups
