[self-follow-up]
I had some proofreading failures here. I'll fix a few of them inline.
At 2024-03-02T05:36:43-0600, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> What percentage of non-cancellation would lead you to believe that
> Savannah's non-GNU hosting service was serving its function well?
>
> And indeed
Dear something,
I wanted to see how group registrations were handled. I was speechless
when I saw these comments from the tasks.
==
> I did explain the misunderstanding on the last time, but had no
follow up.
I'm sorry, I think I had no time.
> What are you saying?
At 2024-03-02T19:36:29+0900, Jing Luo via Discussions among Savannah Hackers,
open subscription wrote:
> I wanted to see how group registrations were handled. I was speechless
> when I saw these comments from the tasks.
I decided to read over all of these too.
>
The problem is not Savannah having a strict screening process. The
problem is not how people fail to submit packages that satisfy the
hosting requirements. The problem is not the percentage of submissions
that were cancelled.
The problem is how the replies to the submitters were written,
Hi Jing Luo,
(I'm afraid I'm too ignorant of Chinese names to make an informed guess
as to which is your surname. I'm sorry about that.)
At 2024-03-02T22:31:04+0900, Jing Luo via Discussions among Savannah Hackers,
open subscription wrote:
> The problem is not Savannah having a strict
On 2024-03-02 23:35, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
Hi Jing Luo,
(I'm afraid I'm too ignorant of Chinese names to make an informed guess
as to which is your surname. I'm sorry about that.)
That was thoughtful :) I write my last name last and go by "Jing".
At 2024-03-02T22:31:04+0900, Jing Luo
