> From: Ian Kelling
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , sysad...@gnu.org,
> savannah-hackers-public@gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 10:19:56 -0400
>
> "Alfred M. Szmidt" writes:
>
> >But the gripe about the FSF Status page is real: lately I find it less
> >and less useful in such cases. Which is
"Alfred M. Szmidt" writes:
> Sometimes, some of us subscribed here, can also ping the FSF admins in
> other ways -- sysadmin@ is not a list that is easily subscribed to
> AFAIK.
That is right, there is no public fsf sysadmin mailing list, just the
sysad...@gnu.org and @fsf.org which both go
"Alfred M. Szmidt" writes:
>But the gripe about the FSF Status page is real: lately I find it less
>and less useful in such cases. Which is too bad.
>
> Just to give a small shout, I agree.
Sorry about that. I will try to be more diligent in updating it and
communicate this to the rest
Sometimes, some of us subscribed here, can also ping the FSF admins in
other ways -- sysadmin@ is not a list that is easily subscribed to
AFAIK.
> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 17:10:45 -0600
> From: Bob Proulx
>
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Since about half an hour ago, I cannot send email via fencepost port
> > 587: I get "connection refused".
> > Logging into fencepost via SSH does work.
> >
> > What is the problem with the SMTP service on
Hello Eli,
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Since about half an hour ago, I cannot send email via fencepost port
> 587: I get "connection refused".
> Logging into fencepost via SSH does work.
>
> What is the problem with the SMTP service on fencepost? Can this be
> fixed, please?
>
> P.S. And if this is
But the gripe about the FSF Status page is real: lately I find it less
and less useful in such cases. Which is too bad.
Just to give a small shout, I agree.
> From: Eli Zaretskii
> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 16:39:53 +0300
> Cc: sysad...@gnu.org
>
> Since about half an hour ago, I cannot send email via fencepost port
> 587: I get "connection refused".
> Logging into fencepost via SSH does work.
>
> What is the problem with the SMTP service on
