[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Update of task #14968 (project administration): Status: In Progress => Done Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #28:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #27, task #14968 (project administration): Hi! any news? cheers, Joa ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via Savannah

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #26, task #14968 (project administration): Hi Ineiev! fixed! the license header was wrong so it had to be corrected in ALL files. > All are many. (comment #6) No they aren't. And this makes communication more difficult http://www.wordreference.com/enru/many

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #25, task #14968 (project administration): Hello, Joa! Many files in your tarball say, You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with Foobar. What has Foobar to do with GSResolver? ___

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #24, task #14968 (project administration): Hi Ineiev! - ok, remade the copyright notice - I didn't know the README should have a full license notice! I thought it had only to show the program license. Added a full license notice. (also it was bad redirecting to COPYING for

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #23, task #14968 (project administration): Hello, Joa; Your README.md file still lacks a valid copyright notice; the "license notice" is also too vague, it confusingly says that COPYING contains the license notice rather than a copy of the license. Then, your package refers to

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #22, task #14968 (project administration): Hello Ineiev! As I already asked: So what lacks this project to be registered? thanks! happy Hacking Joa ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #21, task #14968 (project administration): Hello, Joaquín! I have read the CoC; why do you point at it? ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #20, task #14968 (project administration): Hi! well I don't know if you have ever read this: http://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/CodeOfConduct/ I don't think the submission of this project depends of a issue you've just created in other. I think is a strange coercing way

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #19, task #14968 (project administration): This task depends on sr #109527. ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via Savannah

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #18, task #14968 (project administration): Cool, Perfect! And I'll listen them carefully but in another task as I already said. Could we focus in the submission this task was opened for? Happy Hacking ___ Reply to this

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #17, task #14968 (project administration): Dear Joaquín, I could submit patches, but I don't think you'd really like them; besides that, the objective is to teach the maintainers (that is, you) how to follow Savannah hosting requirements, and no patches from occasional

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #16, task #14968 (project administration): > So, let me be didactic. (...) Hi! thanks for your interest in the project! Feel free to open a task in it's proper place or provide a patch to improve the project, it's free-libre software so my work is yours, and of the whole

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #15, task #14968 (project administration): So, let me be didactic. This is a homework for you: Carefully read Savannah hosting requirements . Visit your first Savannah project and evaluate it against them. Summarize the work

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #14, task #14968 (project administration): I forgot the file! sorry > No, you won't. The maintainers have to keep the things right within their project themselves, they can't rely on Savannah admins to do that. I prefer more than rely, share knowledge, ask for advice, receive

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Additional Item Attachment, task #14968 (project administration): File name: GSResolver.tar.gz Size:20 KB ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #13, task #14968 (project administration): Hello, Please attach the new file. > If I'm not capable I won't be able to register my project? No, you won't. The maintainers have to keep the things right within their project themselves, they can't rely on Savannah admins to do

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #12, task #14968 (project administration): Hi so... #1- In **README.md** I have redirected the user to see the full license in **COPYING** #2- I have removed **ROADMAP** as it seems the only file without license header #3- well after more than 5 revisions I think there

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #11, task #14968 (project administration): > What I don't understand is why the license notice should be longer... but I see noting more. The full notice contains additionally * the disclaimer; and * the instructions on where to get the text of the license. It's important

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #10, task #14968 (project administration): Hi Ineiev! Added copyright statement in readme file. What I don't understand is why the license notice should be longer, in (https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html) only say that if readme file contains “This program is released

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #9, task #14968 (project administration): Hello, Joa! README.md still lacks any copyright notice, please check https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Copyright-Notices.html The recommended form of the license notice is longer: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #8, task #14968 (project administration): ok, small license notice added at the end of the readme file, is it correct? (authors added too by the way) cheers Joa (file #44466) ___ Additional Item Attachment: File name:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #7, task #14968 (project administration): I don't think a readme file has to have a copyright notice :-/ or at least, please, be a little more pedagogic (and nice happy life lover) and tell me exactly what you think it lacks? a copyright notice as a source file? it's gonna

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #6, task #14968 (project administration): > some files in my tarball lacking copyright notices are? > because I see no one README.md, for example. > many files have a wrong form of copyright notice are..? > because they all have the same copyright notices All are many.

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #5, task #14968 (project administration): some files in my tarball lacking copyright notices are? because I see no one many files have a wrong form of copyright notice are..? because they all have the same copyright notices :-S I've remade them with, what I think is, the

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Additional Item Attachment, task #14968 (project administration): File name: GSResolver.tar.gz Size:20 KB ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #4, task #14968 (project administration): Some files in your tarball lack copyright notices; many files have a wrong form of copyright notice; please check our documentation on how they should look like. ___ Reply to this

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Additional Item Attachment, task #14968 (project administration): File name: GSResolver.tar.gz Size:20 KB ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #3, task #14968 (project administration): Please remove backup files created by your editor from your tarball, this looks impolite. ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Follow-up Comment #2, task #14968 (project administration): I've remade headers and changed them also in makefiles Please, could you be more specific if it's already something wrong? thanks! Joa ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

Additional Item Attachment, task #14968 (project administration): File name: GSResolver.tar.gz Size:26 KB ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14968] Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver

URL: Summary: Submission of Gentooza's Sudokus Resolver Project: Savannah Administration Submitted by: gentooza Submitted on: Tue 19 Jun 2018 08:44:41 AM UTC Should Start On: Tue 19 Jun 2018