Re: [Savonet-users] Liquidsoap - http ... Buffer overrun: Dropping 0.03s.

2013-06-21 Thread David Baelde
Hi Alexander, On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Alexander Schremmer a...@alexanderweb.de wrote: The process itself only needs 40% CPU of 400% (dual core, dual threaded). There's one more thing to say: liquidsoap essentially only uses one core at a time. There are two reasons for this: in the

Re: [Savonet-users] Liquidsoap - http ... Buffer overrun: Dropping 0.03s.

2013-06-20 Thread Alexander Schremmer
On 19.06.2013 05:17, David Baelde wrote: The catchup thing is when liquidsoap did not manage to compute its stream fast enough for sending on time. In my experience this is caused by lack of CPU, so I'd advise to look this way. It could be that a latency on the filesystem or network is making

Re: [Savonet-users] Liquidsoap - http ... Buffer overrun: Dropping 0.03s.

2013-06-19 Thread Romain Beauxis
Hi, 2013/6/18 liquids...@aolohr.com: Hi all, Just a little addendum on 'catchups' that we were experiencing (and finally solved): Our IP uses FreeBSD servers, and our particular server has massive resources, lots of CPU power, 2.5 GB RAM, and abundant Bandwidth - 5 TB. So, tracking down

Re: [Savonet-users] Liquidsoap - http ... Buffer overrun: Dropping 0.03s.

2013-06-18 Thread David Baelde
Hi guys, These issues are hard to fix, as they depend on a lot of factors. We should keep watching out for what liquidsoap could do better, but so far I don't see how the tool itself could help here. Instead, I thought I would do a quick recap on what overruns/underruns and we need to catchup

Re: [Savonet-users] Liquidsoap - http ... Buffer overrun: Dropping 0.03s.

2013-06-18 Thread liquidsoap
Hi all, Just a little addendum on 'catchups' that we were experiencing (and finally solved): Our IP uses FreeBSD servers, and our particular server has massive resources, lots of CPU power, 2.5 GB RAM, and abundant Bandwidth - 5 TB. So, tracking down these devils was a real nightmare.

Re: [Savonet-users] Liquidsoap - http ... Buffer overrun: Dropping 0.03s.

2013-06-14 Thread Alexander Schremmer
On 12.06.2013 10:20, Alexander Schremmer wrote: Are the times when this problem happens consistent? Try setting the the CPU priority of Liquidsoap to the max and see if that helps: No, but the other processes might demand resources irregularly. I will give it a boost to -5 (-19 sounds a

Re: [Savonet-users] Liquidsoap - http ... Buffer overrun: Dropping 0.03s.

2013-06-12 Thread Roger Bell_West
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:20:51AM +0200, Alexander Schremmer wrote: Now I have another issue left: after I set a metadata item via telnet, I get spurious skips that look like this in the logs: 2013/06/12 10:16:24 [server:3] New client: localhost. 2013/06/12 10:16:24 [server:3] Client localhost

Re: [Savonet-users] Liquidsoap - http ... Buffer overrun: Dropping 0.03s.

2013-06-10 Thread Martin Konečný
I wonder if your system experiences CPU usage spikes from cron jobs or something similar that causes Liquidsoap to fall behind. Are the times when this problem happens consistent? Try setting the the CPU priority of Liquidsoap to the max and see if that helps: to find pid: ps aux | grep liq: to