En un mensaje anterior, der Mouse escribió:
I think over the past 40 years or so, as a discipline, we've failed
rather miserably at teaching programming, period.
Right. But on the other hand, that's not surprising - [because
we've mostly not even _tried_ to teach programming, as opposed
Hi All,
FYI... This topic has come up here a few times, so I thought that I'd send a
pointer to my July eSecurityPlanet column
(http://www.esecurityplanet.com/views/article.php/3377201 - free, no registration
required). In the column, I take the seemingly unpopular view --at least in
this
You are not nuts. Your course outline is a very substantial step in the
right direction.
- Original Message -
From: Dana Epp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Fernando Schapachnik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 16:42
Subject: Re: [SC-L] Education and security
In Ken van Wyk's cited article at
http://www.esecurityplanet.com/views/article.php/3377201
he writes...
As I said above, user awareness training is a fine practice
that shouldn't be abandoned. Users are our first defense
against security problems, and they should certainly be
educated
der Mouse wrote:
Care to explain what do you think a 'programming course' should have
that is not covered in SE or CS courses (or curricula)?
A computer scientist is a theoretician. A software engineer is a
designer. A programmer is an implementer.
A computer scientist can prove you can't,
