Re: [SC-L] Compilers

2006-12-22 Thread mikeiscool
On 12/22/06, Gary McGraw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a better idead. Stop using C++. Jeeze. Even better then that; stop programming insecurely. gem *rolleyes* -- mic ___ Secure Coding mailing list (SC-L) SC-L@securecoding.org List

Re: [SC-L] Compilers

2006-12-22 Thread James Walden
On 12/21/06, Gary McGraw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a better idead. Stop using C++. Jeeze. I'll second that recommendation. Given the abundance of better languages, there are few good reasons to use dangerous languages like C++ on new projects. It's easier and less time consuming to

Re: [SC-L] Compilers

2006-12-22 Thread James Walden
On 12/21/06, Stephen de Vries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can achieve very similar goals by using unit tests. Although the tests are not integrated into the code as tightly as something like Spark (or enforcing rules in the compiler), they are considered part of the source. IMO unit and