On the other hand, isn't it somewhat analagous to hiring 24/7 armed security 
guards and installing a state of the art physical security system in a museum, 
and passing and enforcing strict laws against grand larceny?

The "secure coding" alternative would be for museums to stop displaying 
priceless art works.

===
Karen Mercedes Goertzel, CISSP
Lead Associate
Booz Allen Hamilton
703.698.7454
goertzel_ka...@bah.com

"If you're not failing every now and again,
it's a sign you're not doing anything very innovative."
- Woody Allen
________________________________
From: sc-l-boun...@securecoding.org [sc-l-boun...@securecoding.org] on behalf 
of Bobby G. Miller [b.g.mil...@gmail.com]
Sent: 20 September 2013 19:47
To: sc-l@securecoding.org
Subject: [External] [SC-L] Sad state of affairs

I was just listening to a podcast interviewing a security executive from a 
prominent vendor.  The response to vulnerabilities was to raise the 
cost/complexity of exploiting bugs rather than actually employing secure coding 
practices.  What saddened me most was that the approach was apparently 
effective enough.

_______________________________________________
Secure Coding mailing list (SC-L) SC-L@securecoding.org
List information, subscriptions, etc - http://krvw.com/mailman/listinfo/sc-l
List charter available at - http://www.securecoding.org/list/charter.php
SC-L is hosted and moderated by KRvW Associates, LLC (http://www.KRvW.com)
as a free, non-commercial service to the software security community.
Follow KRvW Associates on Twitter at: http://twitter.com/KRvW_Associates
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to