mailto:secse-ch...@sislab.no]
*Sent:* 05 March 2012 07:02
*To:* Secure Coding
*Subject:* [SC-L] Fwd: [SEWORLD] SWEBOK Version 3 Call for Reviewers
Hi SC-L,
I would have hoped that Software Security should have been a topic
area in SWEBOK, right alongside Software Quality, but it doesn't
look like
Hi SC-L,
I would have hoped that Software Security should have been a topic
area in SWEBOK, right alongside Software Quality, but it doesn't look
like it...
-Martin
Opprinnelig melding
Emne: [SEWORLD] SWEBOK Version 3 Call for Reviewers
Dato: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 10:53:26
...@securecoding.org [sc-l-boun...@securecoding.org] on behalf
of Martin Gilje Jaatun [secse-ch...@sislab.no]
Sent: 05 March 2012 07:02
To: Secure Coding
Subject: [SC-L] Fwd: [SEWORLD] SWEBOK Version 3 Call for Reviewers
Hi SC-L,
I would have hoped that Software Security should have been a topic area
@securecoding.orgmailto:SC-L@securecoding.org
Subject: Re: [SC-L] Fwd: [SEWORLD] SWEBOK Version 3 Call for Reviewers
Unfortunately, it seems like the SWEBOK folks still believe that if you have
high-quality software, that will be sufficient to assure robustness against
intentional threats. It also shows