Re: [SC-L] Fwd: [SEWORLD] SWEBOK Version 3 Call for Reviewers

2012-03-11 Thread Martin Gilje Jaatun
mailto:secse-ch...@sislab.no] *Sent:* 05 March 2012 07:02 *To:* Secure Coding *Subject:* [SC-L] Fwd: [SEWORLD] SWEBOK Version 3 Call for Reviewers Hi SC-L, I would have hoped that Software Security should have been a topic area in SWEBOK, right alongside Software Quality, but it doesn't look like

[SC-L] Fwd: [SEWORLD] SWEBOK Version 3 Call for Reviewers

2012-03-07 Thread Martin Gilje Jaatun
Hi SC-L, I would have hoped that Software Security should have been a topic area in SWEBOK, right alongside Software Quality, but it doesn't look like it... -Martin Opprinnelig melding Emne: [SEWORLD] SWEBOK Version 3 Call for Reviewers Dato: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 10:53:26

Re: [SC-L] Fwd: [SEWORLD] SWEBOK Version 3 Call for Reviewers

2012-03-07 Thread Goertzel, Karen [USA]
...@securecoding.org [sc-l-boun...@securecoding.org] on behalf of Martin Gilje Jaatun [secse-ch...@sislab.no] Sent: 05 March 2012 07:02 To: Secure Coding Subject: [SC-L] Fwd: [SEWORLD] SWEBOK Version 3 Call for Reviewers Hi SC-L, I would have hoped that Software Security should have been a topic area

Re: [SC-L] Fwd: [SEWORLD] SWEBOK Version 3 Call for Reviewers

2012-03-07 Thread Gary McGraw
@securecoding.orgmailto:SC-L@securecoding.org Subject: Re: [SC-L] Fwd: [SEWORLD] SWEBOK Version 3 Call for Reviewers Unfortunately, it seems like the SWEBOK folks still believe that if you have high-quality software, that will be sufficient to assure robustness against intentional threats. It also shows