Interesting article out on ZDNet today:
http://www.zdnetasia.com/news/security/0,39044215,39315781,00.htm
The article refers to the US government sponsored study being done by Stanford
University,
Symantec, and Coverity. It says, The so-called LAMP stack of open-source
software has a
lower
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kenneth R. van Wyk
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 10:56 AM
To: Secure Coding Mailing List
Subject: [SC-L] ZDNET: LAMP lights the way in open-source security
Interesting article out on ZDNet today:
http://www.zdnetasia.com/news
07, 2006 12:17 PM
To: Gavin, Michael; Kenneth R. van Wyk; Secure Coding Mailing List
Subject: RE: [SC-L] ZDNET: LAMP lights the way in open-source security
All of which proves that there are lies, damn lies, and statistics (the
statistic being the lower bug density, which ignores the most
. van Wyk; Secure Coding Mailing List
Subject: RE: [SC-L] ZDNET: LAMP lights the way in open-source security
Yeah, statistics can allow you to say and prove just about anything.
OK, showing my ignorance here, since I haven't checked out any of the
LAMP source trees and reviewed the code: how
-Original Message-
From: Crispin Cowan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gavin, Michael wrote:
Yeah, statistics can allow you to say and prove just about
anything.
OK, showing my ignorance here, since I haven't checked out any of the
LAMP source trees and reviewed the code: how much of the
/~gem
-Original Message-
From: Gavin, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue Mar 07 16:40:00 2006
To: Crispin Cowan
Cc: Jeremy Epstein; Secure Coding Mailing List
Subject:RE: [SC-L] ZDNET: LAMP lights the way in open-source security
-Original Message-
From
