-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kenneth R. van Wyk wrote:
>FYI, there's a white paper out by Dan O'Dowd of Green Hills Software (see
>http://www.ghs.com/linux/manyeyes.html) that "It is trivial to infiltrate the
>loose association of Linux organizations which have developers all o
Paco Hope wrote:
> Somebody's gotta come up with a reasonable definition of "remotely
> exploitable."
Agreed; this lack of an agreed-upon vocabulary is the cause of all sorts
of misunderstandings that don't make the news.
These days, with everything networked, I'm not sure proximity is a
usuall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Margus Freudenthal wrote:
Consider the bridge example brought up earlier. If your bridge builder
finished the job but said: "ohh, the bridge isn't secure though. If
someone tries to push it at a certain angle, it will fall".
Ultimately it is a matter of
