Re: [SC-L] Genotypes and Phenotypes (Gunnar Peterson)

2009-10-14 Thread Andreas Saurwein Franci Gonçalves
2009/10/14 SC-L Reader Dave Aronson securecoding2d...@davearonson.com Andreas Saurwein Franci Gonçalves saurw...@gmail.com wrote (rearranged into correct order): 2009/10/13 Bobby Miller b.g.mil...@gmail.com The obvious difference is parts. In manufacturing, things are assembled from

Re: [SC-L] Genotypes and Phenotypes (Gunnar Peterson)

2009-10-13 Thread Andreas Saurwein Franci Gonçalves
Thats the idea of libraries. Well known, well specified, well tested parts. Well, whatever. 2009/10/13 Bobby Miller b.g.mil...@gmail.com The obvious difference is parts. In manufacturing, things are assembled from well-known, well-specified, tested parts. Hmmm ... If you look at other

Re: [SC-L] Interesting article on the adoption of Software Security

2004-06-12 Thread Andreas Saurwein
Crispin Cowan wrote: However, where ever C made an arbitrary decision (either way is just as good) PL/M went the opposite direction from C, making it very annoying for a C programmer to use. Does that mean it did not make any decision at all? What was the outcome? Michael S Hines wrote: When

[SC-L] User Education Tool?

2004-03-04 Thread Andreas Saurwein
On a somewhat abstract line of thinking, in regards to the latest virus outbreaks, one idea came up which might be even useful: I think that we all agree that the current outbreak of Netsky, Bagle and others is mainly because users still try to open everything they receive, no matter how weird